Including the perspectives of scientists about the nature and process of science is important for an authentic and nuanced portrayal of science in science education. The small number of studies that have explored scientists’ worldviews about science has thus far generated contradictory findings, with recent studies claiming that scientists simultaneously hold contradictory sophisticated and naïve views. This article reports on an exploratory study that uses the framework of Bhaskar’s critical realism to elicit and separately analyse academic scientists’ ontological and epistemological views about science in semi-structured interviews. When the views of scientists are analysed through the lens of critical realism, it is clear that it is possible to hold a realist ontological commitment about what knowledge is of, simultaneously with a fallibilist epistemological commitment about knowledge itself. The apparent incongruence of scientists’ so-called naïve and sophisticated views about science is resolved when analysed using a critical realist framework. Critical realism offers a simple and coherent framework for science educators that avoids many of the problems of positivism and social constructivism by finding a middle ground between them. The three pillars of critical realism: ontological realism, epistemological fallibilism and judgmental rationality help to make sense of how socially constructed scientific knowledge can be anchored in an independent reality.
...More
Chapter
Alberto Giovanni Biuso;
(2016)
Filosofia teoretica come filosofia del tempo
(/isis/citation/CBB812907389/)
Chapter
Bruno Maiorca;
(2016)
Otto stelloncini filosofici sul "nuovo realismo"
(/isis/citation/CBB673763198/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Harker, David;
(2010)
Two Arguments for Scientific Realism Unified
(/isis/citation/CBB001021670/)
Article
Quale, Andreas;
(2011)
On the Role of Mathematics in Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB001032754/)
Book
Evandro Agazzi;
(2014)
Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB896368292/)
Article
van Heur, Bas;
Leydesdorff, Loet;
Wyatt, Sally;
(June 2013)
Turning to ontology in STS? Turning to STS through ‘ontology’
(/isis/citation/CBB199076323/)
Book
Musgrave, Alan;
Cheyne, Colin;
Worrall, John;
(2006)
Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave
(/isis/citation/CBB000701304/)
Article
Matthias Neuber;
(2020)
Two Forms of American Critical Realism: Perception and Reality in Santayana/Strong and Sellars
(/isis/citation/CBB019756706/)
Book
Salmon, Wesley C.;
Dowe, Phil;
Salmon, Merrilee H.;
(2005)
Reality and Rationality
(/isis/citation/CBB000600034/)
Essay Review
Brysse, Keynyn;
(2010)
Cryptozoology, Archaeology and Palaeontology: Histories Near the High Table
(/isis/citation/CBB001566356/)
Book
Turner, Derek D.;
(2007)
Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB000830147/)
Article
French, Steven;
(2011)
Shifting to Structures in Physics and Biology: A Prophylactic for Promiscuous Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB001024001/)
Article
Karitzis, A.;
(2005)
Sellars on Science and Ontological Committment
(/isis/citation/CBB000931341/)
Article
David Merritt;
(2021)
Cosmological Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB244895079/)
Thesis
Heberlig, Nathan;
(2007)
On the Ontological Status of Space-Time: Scientific Realism and GeometricalExplanation
(/isis/citation/CBB001561278/)
Article
Adrien Vila Valls;
(2015)
Entre causalisme et positivisme : La réception épistémologique de la mécanique quantique par les théoriciens français de la génération de l’entre-deux-guerres
(/isis/citation/CBB691093830/)
Book
Dascal, Marcelo;
(2008)
Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?
(/isis/citation/CBB001023818/)
Book
Mario Dal Pra;
Fabio Minazzi;
(1992)
Ragione e storia. Mezzo secolo di filosofia italiana
(/isis/citation/CBB794097993/)
Book
Fabio Minazzi;
(2021)
Epistemologia storico-evolutiva e neorealismo logico
(/isis/citation/CBB163381119/)
Be the first to comment!