This article explains how regulators use categorization, quantification, and labeling to change how corporations manufacture commercial products. The Food and Drug Administration wanted to create an incentive for manufacturers to replace trans fats by requiring food labels to disclose trans fat content. The Food and Drug Administration initially proposed categorizing trans fats as saturated fats and quantifying both substances with one number on labels, but industry actors largely favored quantifying trans fats separately from saturated fats. Industry actors argued that such an approach would show consumers which products had been reformulated to contain 0 g of trans fats, thus allowing manufacturers to market reformulated products as ‘healthier’ and rewarding investments in alternative technologies. The Food and Drug Administration ultimately decided to categorize and quantify the two fats separately, specifically designing the disclosure of quantitative information in order to encourage technological change. Thus, I argue that quantifying information on commercial product labels was not only intended to govern individual consumption but was also intended to govern production in anticipation of individuals governing their consumption. Regulators used their capacity to quantify as a means to govern industrial production.
...More
Article
Christopher L. Cummings;
Agnes S. F. Chuah;
Shirley S. Ho;
(September 2018)
Protection Motivation and Communication through Nanofood Labels: Improving Predictive Capabilities of Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Nanofoods
(/isis/citation/CBB867911612/)
Article
Kristoffer Whitney;
(2019)
It’s about Time: Adaptive Resource Management, Environmental Governance, and Science Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB335286233/)
Article
Judy Z Segal;
(August 2018)
Sex, drugs, and rhetoric: The case of flibanserin for ‘female sexual dysfunction’
(/isis/citation/CBB311917478/)
Article
Mattia Andreoletti;
David Teira;
(2019)
Rules versus Standards: What Are the Costs of Epistemic Norms in Drug Regulation?
(/isis/citation/CBB881753075/)
Article
Leonie Dendler;
Gaby-Fleur Böl;
(July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB423909656/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Poonam Pandey;
Aviram Sharma;
(2017)
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India
(/isis/citation/CBB915250388/)
Article
Samuel Ducourant;
(2023)
Science or Ignorance of Animal Welfare? A Case Study: Scientific Reports Published in Preparation for the First European Directive on Animal Welfare (1979-1980)
(/isis/citation/CBB241761697/)
Thesis
Nicole Welk-Joerger;
(2020)
Feeding Others to Feed Ourselves: Animal Nutrition and the Politics of Health, 1900–2019
(/isis/citation/CBB263318909/)
Article
Xaq Frohlich;
(April 2017)
The informational turn in food politics: The US FDA’s nutrition label as information infrastructure
(/isis/citation/CBB818928934/)
Article
Philip Olson;
Christine Labuski;
(August 2018)
‘There’s always a [white] man in the loop’: The gendered and racialized politics of civilian drones
(/isis/citation/CBB568832607/)
Article
Allison Loconto;
Scott Prudham;
Steven Wolf;
(2024)
Environmental governance through metrics: guest introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB894684908/)
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Nina Amelung;
(October 2016)
Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement
(/isis/citation/CBB261047944/)
Book
Benjamin R. Cohen;
(2019)
Pure Adulteration: Cheating on Nature in the Age of Manufactured Food
(/isis/citation/CBB174903984/)
Book
David J. Hess;
(2016)
Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions
(/isis/citation/CBB272081586/)
Article
Amy Adams Quark;
(2019)
Outsourcing Regulatory Decision-making: “International” Epistemic Communities, Transnational Firms, and Pesticide Residue Standards in India
(/isis/citation/CBB678564374/)
Article
Katharina T. Paul;
Samantha Vanderslott;
Matthias Gross;
(2022)
Institutionalised ignorance in policy and regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB024957428/)
Article
Ashlyn Jaeger;
(2019)
(Re)Producing Cyborgs: Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain
(/isis/citation/CBB770211028/)
Article
Lynch, Michael;
(June 2013)
Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology
(/isis/citation/CBB361114447/)
Article
Berger, Rachel;
(October 2019)
Clarified Commodities: Managing Ghee in Interwar India
(/isis/citation/CBB936401158/)
Be the first to comment!