This paper characterizes the crisis of expertise, especially as it manifested during the covid-19 pandemic, as a crisis of trust in regulatory science. The temporal structure of the facts produced by regulatory science differs from Kuhnian “normal science,” while they also contain profound distributional implications. As a result, they suffer from a set of congenital problems that provoke mistrust in a way that normal science facts do not. While “expertise” is often offered as an answer to these problems, the paper shows that it is a symptom of the malaise, reflecting a situation where it is no longer clear how to decide between competing claims to authority as experts. The current mistrust in experts and regulatory science during the pandemic, therefore, is part of a longer and systemic crisis of expertise provoked and sustained by multiple factors. The paper then offers an unsystematic set of rules of method to observe when addressing the thorny issues involving trust and mistrust: 1) trust is not a subjective attitude that can be measured by a survey; 2) mistrust is not the opposite of trust; 3) trust is a social skill involving a set of ethnomethods for distinguishing between responsible and “blind” trust; 4) attention to temporal framing is key to these methods; 5) disruption of this temporal framing – as routinely happens with regulatory facts, and especially during the pandemic – destroys trust.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Stephen John;
(2022)
The Two Virtues of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB589589263/)
Article
Tiago Ribeiro Duarte;
(2020)
Ignoring scientific advice during the Covid-19 pandemic: Bolsonaro’s actions and discourse
(/isis/citation/CBB565587316/)
Article
Robert Evans;
(February 2022)
SAGE advice and political decision-making: ‘Following the science’ in times of epistemic uncertainty
(/isis/citation/CBB466460955/)
Article
Mott Greene;
(2022)
Experts, Managerialism, and Democratic Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB659481305/)
Article
Sven Dupré;
Geert Somsen;
(2019)
The History of Knowledge and the Future of Knowledge Societies
(/isis/citation/CBB931053546/)
Article
Cliff Hooker;
Claire Hooker;
Giles Hooker;
(2022)
Expertise, a Framework for our Most Characteristic Asset and Most Basic Inequality
(/isis/citation/CBB995485726/)
Article
Matthew Hayes;
Noah Morritt;
(2020)
Michael W. Burke-Gaffney and the UFO Debate in Atlantic Canada, 1947-1969
(/isis/citation/CBB417665220/)
Book
Joris Vandendriessche;
Evert Peeters;
Kaat Wils;
(2015)
Scientists' Expertise as Performance: Between State and Society, 1860–1960
(/isis/citation/CBB826263249/)
Article
Gregory Schrempp;
(2022)
The Best Popular Science
(/isis/citation/CBB041484504/)
Article
Stefano Crabu;
Ilenia Picardi;
Valentina Turrini;
(2023)
Refused-knowledge during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mobilising Experiential Expertise for Care and Well-being
(/isis/citation/CBB291581369/)
Article
Luciano Levin;
(2020)
Advising and controling: Science communication at a crossroads
(/isis/citation/CBB642580991/)
Article
Giampietro Gobo;
Barbara Sena;
(2022)
Questioning and Disputing Vaccination Policies. Scientists and Experts in the Italian Public Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB026130989/)
Article
Cristiano B. Moura;
Matheus Monteiro Nascimento;
Nathan Willig Lima;
(2021)
Epistemic and Political Confrontations Around the Public Policies to Fight COVID-19 Pandemic
(/isis/citation/CBB979964202/)
Article
Monamie Bhadra Haines;
(February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India
(/isis/citation/CBB710438620/)
Article
Clarissa Ai Ling Lee;
(2023)
Managing ‘Wicked’ Technoscientific Problems: The Postnormal Science of Risk Narratives
(/isis/citation/CBB747521102/)
Book
Gil Eyal;
(2019)
The Crisis of Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB193528078/)
Article
Emily K. Vraga;
Leticia Bode;
(October 2017)
Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media
(/isis/citation/CBB385086168/)
Article
Melanie Leenen;
Bart Penders;
(October 2016)
Dissident Dietary Credibility: The Power of Discontent
(/isis/citation/CBB229041974/)
Article
Sharon Dunwoody;
Patrice A. Kohl;
(June 2017)
Using Weight-of-Experts Messaging to Communicate Accurately About Contested Science
(/isis/citation/CBB561164957/)
Article
Hiro Saito;
(January 2021)
The Developmental State and Public Participation: The Case of Energy Policy-making in Post–Fukushima Japan
(/isis/citation/CBB786983437/)
Be the first to comment!