Concepts of Originality in the Natural Science, Medical, and Engineering Disciplines: An Analysis of Research Proposals (2019)
Science is fundamentally devoted to generating original knowledge, and therefore concepts of scientific originality are keys to understanding its very essence. Scientific originality has long been thought of as discovery, but new studies of the humanities and social sciences have shown that other, discipline-specific concepts of originality are used in these fields of study. Does this finding also hold for disciplines in the natural science, medicine, and engineering? Are concepts of originality scientifically grounded or do they instead reflect extrascientific modes of originality? These questions lie at the heart of research proposals responding to an initiative explicitly calling for original scientific projects. The proposals undergo a two-step analysis based on grounded theory. First, three empirically identified modes of scientific originality are described: temporal, partially different, and revolutionary. The three modes of originality are consistent with extrascientific ones such as those in art and fashion. Second, six disciplines—two each in the natural science, medical, and engineering—are analyzed for ways the three modes of originality are used and for their associated disciplinary characteristics in order to identify discipline-specific concepts of originality.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Lisa Sigl;
(May 2016)
On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research
(/isis/citation/CBB119230475/)
Article
Alexander Rushforth;
Thomas Franssen;
Sarah de Rijcke;
(2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups
(/isis/citation/CBB805796865/)
Article
Joeri Bruyninckx;
(September 2017)
Synchronicity: Time, Technicians, Instruments, and Invisible Repair
(/isis/citation/CBB976044504/)
Article
Sabina Leonelli;
Brian Rappert;
Gail Davies;
(March 2017)
Data Shadows: Knowledge, Openness, and Absence (Special Issue Introduction)
(/isis/citation/CBB950275922/)
Article
Sharon Koppman;
Cindy L. Cain;
Erin Leahey;
(January 2015)
The Joy of Science: Disciplinary Diversity in Emotional Accounts
(/isis/citation/CBB804515765/)
Article
Elina I. Mäkinen;
(2019)
The Power of Peer Review on Transdisciplinary Discovery
(/isis/citation/CBB034066102/)
Article
Erin A. Cech;
Anneke Metz;
Jessie L. Smith;
Karen deVries;
(September 2017)
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality: Experiences of Native American Science, Engineering, and Health Students
(/isis/citation/CBB816459691/)
Article
Elina I. Mäkinen;
(March 2018)
Action in the Space Between: From Latent to Active Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB718195671/)
Article
Caitlin Donahue Wylie;
(March 2018)
Trust in Technicians in Paleontology Laboratories
(/isis/citation/CBB439482778/)
Article
Veronica Boix Mansilla;
Michèle Lamont;
Kyoko Sato;
(July 2016)
Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms: Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations
(/isis/citation/CBB848487776/)
Article
Andrea Boggio;
Andrea Ballabeni;
David Hemenway;
(March 2016)
Basic Research and Knowledge Production Modes: A View from the Harvard Medical School
(/isis/citation/CBB479468835/)
Article
Martin Stacey;
Claudia Eckert;
(2022)
Objects as Carriers of Engineering Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB558820507/)
Article
Harman, Oren;
Galison, Peter;
(2008)
Epistemic Virtues and Leibnizian Dreams: On the Shifting Boundaries between Science, Humanities, and Faith
(/isis/citation/CBB001030484/)
Article
Sjoerd Zwart;
(2022)
Engineering Epistemology: Between Theory and Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB714204838/)
Article
Jennifer S. Singh;
(Marvh 2015)
Narratives of Participation in Autism Genetics Research
(/isis/citation/CBB713757349/)
Article
Tousignant, Noemi;
(October 2013)
Broken tempos: Of means and memory in a Senegalese university laboratory
(/isis/citation/CBB036851501/)
Article
Maximilian Fochler;
(September 2016)
Variants of Epistemic Capitalism: Knowledge Production and the Accumulation of Worth in Commercial Biotechnology and the Academic Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB025579518/)
Article
Bas de Boer;
Hedwig te Molder;
Peter-Paul Verbeek;
(June 2021)
Understanding science-in-the-making by letting scientific instruments speak: From semiotics to postphenomenology
(/isis/citation/CBB679375422/)
Article
Knaapen. Loes;
(October 2013)
Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development
(/isis/citation/CBB444983980/)
Article
Clay Davis;
(December 2020)
Homo adhaerens: Risk and adherence in biomedical HIV prevention research
(/isis/citation/CBB559629478/)
Be the first to comment!