Undone Science and Counter-Expertise: Fighting for Justice in an Argentine Community Contaminated by Pesticides (2019)
Arancibia, Florencia (Author)
Motta, Renata (Author)
Science as Culture
Volume: 28
Issue: 3
Pages: 277-302
STS and social movement scholars have shown the importance of ‘getting undone science done’ to advance the goals of social movements fighting environmental health injustice. The production and mobilization of counter-expertise, meaning the reliance on expertise, broadly construed, to contest regulatory decisions based on scientific knowledge, must be further analyzed by differentiating among types of expertise and strategies to mobilize them. In social mobilization against the unrestricted use of pesticides in Argentina, the affected community in Ituzaingó Anexo developed three types of expertise. The community first drew upon its own local knowledge of cases of illness and, as lay people, produced the first epidemiological map of this area. Then, they enrolled scientists and NGOs as allies to jointly learn about pesticide contamination as an explanation for illness. The enlisted scientists produced new knowledge by conducting environmental and epidemiological studies. Finally, sympathetic public health authorities, legal experts, and a district attorney designed a successful legal strategy to stop fumigations in that area and enforce local regulations. The case confirms the importance of producing undone science, and shows that its effectiveness can be explained by intertwined strategies deployed by a triad of lay/local, scientific, and legal experts to overcome the expertise barrier.
...MoreArticle Logan D. A. Williams; Sharlissa Moore (2019) Guest Editorial: Conceptualizing Justice and Counter-Expertise. Science as Culture (pp. 251-276).
Article Gloria Baigorrotegui (2019) Making Justice for Counter-Expertise and Doing Counter-Expertise for Justice. Science as Culture (pp. 375-382).
Article Kelly Moore; Nathalia Hernández Vidal; Daniel Lee Kleinman (2019) Knowledge and Justice: A Comment. Science as Culture (pp. 383-390).
Article Oluwatoyin Dare Kolawole (2019) Science, Social Scientisation and Hybridisation of Knowledges. Science as Culture (pp. 391-401).
Similar Citations
Article
Suryanarayanan, Sainath;
Daniel Lee Kleinman. Daniel Lee;
(April 2013)
Be(e)coming experts: The controversy over insecticides in the honey bee colony collapse disorder
(/isis/citation/CBB096871778/)
Article
Federico Brandmayr;
(May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB603433424/)
Article
Jaakko Taipale;
(June 2019)
Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB635897203/)
Article
Barbara L. Allen;
(November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region
(/isis/citation/CBB069762669/)
Book
Dvera I. Saxton;
(2021)
The Devil's Fruit: Farmworkers, Health, and Environmental Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB347232041/)
Article
Kristina Lyons;
(June 2018)
Chemical warfare in Colombia, evidentiary ecologies and senti-actuando practices of justice
(/isis/citation/CBB207428005/)
Article
Logan D. A. Williams;
Sharlissa Moore;
(2019)
Guest Editorial: Conceptualizing Justice and Counter-Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB521476031/)
Article
Jennie L Durant;
(October 2020)
Ignorance loops: How non-knowledge about bee-toxic agrochemicals is iteratively produced
(/isis/citation/CBB459611870/)
Article
Aviram Sharma;
(2017)
Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms: Understanding the Intersections of Science and Law in Developing Countries
(/isis/citation/CBB115411091/)
Article
Jongyoung Kim;
Heeyun Kim;
Jawoon Lim;
(2020)
The Politics of Science and Undone Protection in the “Samsung Leukemia” Case
(/isis/citation/CBB267983165/)
Article
Philip R. Egert;
Barbara L. Allen;
(2019)
Knowledge Justice: An Opportunity for Counter-expertise in Security vs. Science Debates
(/isis/citation/CBB135681924/)
Article
John Gardner;
Gabrielle Samuel;
Clare Williams;
(November 2015)
Sociology of Low Expectations: Recalibration as Innovation Work in Biomedicine
(/isis/citation/CBB250077809/)
Article
Kathleen M. Vogel;
Michael A. Dennis;
(September 2018)
Tacit Knowledge, Secrecy, and Intelligence Assessments: STS Interventions by Two Participant Observers
(/isis/citation/CBB829576730/)
Article
Durant, Darrin;
(October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science
(/isis/citation/CBB562394056/)
Article
Sky Edith Gross;
Shai Lavi;
Hagai Boas;
(2019)
Medicine, Technology, and Religion Reconsidered: The Case of Brain Death Definition in Israel
(/isis/citation/CBB228629534/)
Article
Elina I. Mäkinen;
(March 2018)
Action in the Space Between: From Latent to Active Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB718195671/)
Article
Tiago Ribeiro Duarte;
(2020)
Ignoring scientific advice during the Covid-19 pandemic: Bolsonaro’s actions and discourse
(/isis/citation/CBB565587316/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Colleen Lanier-Christensen;
(September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making
(/isis/citation/CBB606231580/)
Article
Paige L Sweet;
Danielle Giffort;
(June 2021)
The bad expert
(/isis/citation/CBB216520442/)
Be the first to comment!