Article ID: CBB173602193

“Batesonian Mendelism” and “Pearsonian biometry”: Shedding new light on the controversy between William Bateson and Karl Pearson (2022)

unapi

This paper contributes to the ongoing reassessment of the controversy between William Bateson and Karl Pearson by characterising what we call “Batesonian Mendelism” and “Pearsonian biometry” as coherent and competing scientific outlooks. Contrary to the thesis that such a controversy stemmed from diverging theoretical commitments on the nature of heredity and evolution, we argue that Pearson’s and Bateson’s alternative views on those processes ultimately relied on different appraisals of the methodological value of the statistical apparatus developed by Francis Galton. Accordingly, we contend that Bateson’s belief in the primacy of cross-breeding experiments over statistical analysis constituted a minimal methodological unifying condition ensuring the internal coherence of Batesonian Mendelism. Moreover, this same belief implied a view of the study of heredity and evolution as an experimental endeavour and a conception of heredity and evolution as fundamentally discontinuous processes. Similarly, we identify a minimal methodological unifying condition for Pearsonian biometry, which we characterise as the view that experimental methods had to be subordinate to statistical analysis, according to methodological standards set by biometrical research. This other methodological commitment entailed conceiving the study of heredity and evolution as subsumable under biometry and primed Pearson to regard discontinuous hereditary and evolutionary processes as exceptions to a statistical norm. Finally, we conclude that Batesonian Mendelism and Pearsonian biometry represented two potential versions of a single genetics-based evolutionary synthesis since the methodological principles and the phenomena that played a central role in the former were also acknowledged by the latter—albeit as fringe cases—and conversely.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB173602193/

Similar Citations

Article Rushton, A. R.; (2000)
Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context

Article Yafeng Shan; (2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry

Article Morrison, Margaret; (2002)
Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry

Article Nicholas W. Gillham; (2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism

Book Rushton, Alan R.; (2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939

Article Pence, Charles H.; (2011)
“Describing Our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson

Article Charles H. Pence; (2022)
Of stirps and chromosomes: Generality through detail

Chapter Gayon, Jean; (2007)
Karl Pearson ou les enjeux du phénoménalisme dans les sciences biologiques vers 1900

Article Porter, Theodore M.; (2014)
The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance

Article Tabery, James G.; (2004)
The `Evolutionary Synthesis' of George Udny Yule

Article Farrall, Lyndsay A.; (1975)
Controversy and conflict in science: A case study--The English biometric school and Mendel's laws

Article Bernardino Fantini; (2017)
“Treasure your exceptions!” (William Bateson, 1908): leggi e variazioni nella genetica mendeliana

Article Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr; (2012)
Um representante do estilo de pensamento científico “compreensivo,” William Bateson (1861--1926): ciência, política e arte

Article Tabery, James; (2008)
R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype--Environment Interaction

Article María González-Moreno; Cristian Saborido; David Teira; (2015)
Disease-mongering through clinical trials

Article Magnello, M. Eileen; (2009)
Karl Pearson and the Establishment of Mathematical Statistics

Article Radick, Gregory; (2013)
The Professor and the Pea: Lives and Afterlives of William Bateson's Campaign for the Utility of Mendelism

Article Richmond, Marsha L.; (2001)
Women in the Early History of Genetics: William Bateson and the Newnham College Mendelians, 1900--1910

Book Simunek, Michal; (2011)
The Letters on G. J. Mendel: Correspondence of William Bateson, Hugo Iltis, and Erich Von Tschermak-Seysenegg with Alois and Ferdinand Schindler, 1902--1935

Article Richmond, Marsha L.; (2006)
The “Domestication” of Heredity: The Familial Organization of Geneticists at Cambridge University, 1895--1910

Authors & Contributors
Pence, Charles H.
Richmond, Marsha L.
Tabery, James G.
Fantini, Bernardino
Farrall, Lyndsay A.
Gayon, Jean
Journals
Journal of the History of Biology
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Filosofia e História da Biologia
International Statistical Review
Publishers
Centre for Sciences and Humanities of the Institute of Contemporary History of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Trafford Publishing
Concepts
Mendelism; Mendelian inheritance
Genetics
Biometry
Heredity
Probability and statistics
Biology
People
Bateson, William
Pearson, Karl
Weldon, Walter Frank Raphael
Galton, Francis
Mendel, Gregor Johann
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer
Time Periods
20th century, early
20th century
19th century
17th century
18th century
20th century, late
Places
Great Britain
British Isles
Germany
Institutions
Cambridge University
Royal Society of London
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment