This paper contributes to the ongoing reassessment of the controversy between William Bateson and Karl Pearson by characterising what we call “Batesonian Mendelism” and “Pearsonian biometry” as coherent and competing scientific outlooks. Contrary to the thesis that such a controversy stemmed from diverging theoretical commitments on the nature of heredity and evolution, we argue that Pearson’s and Bateson’s alternative views on those processes ultimately relied on different appraisals of the methodological value of the statistical apparatus developed by Francis Galton. Accordingly, we contend that Bateson’s belief in the primacy of cross-breeding experiments over statistical analysis constituted a minimal methodological unifying condition ensuring the internal coherence of Batesonian Mendelism. Moreover, this same belief implied a view of the study of heredity and evolution as an experimental endeavour and a conception of heredity and evolution as fundamentally discontinuous processes. Similarly, we identify a minimal methodological unifying condition for Pearsonian biometry, which we characterise as the view that experimental methods had to be subordinate to statistical analysis, according to methodological standards set by biometrical research. This other methodological commitment entailed conceiving the study of heredity and evolution as subsumable under biometry and primed Pearson to regard discontinuous hereditary and evolutionary processes as exceptions to a statistical norm. Finally, we conclude that Batesonian Mendelism and Pearsonian biometry represented two potential versions of a single genetics-based evolutionary synthesis since the methodological principles and the phenomena that played a central role in the former were also acknowledged by the latter—albeit as fringe cases—and conversely.
...More
Article
Rushton, A. R.;
(2000)
Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context
Article
Yafeng Shan;
(2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry
Article
Morrison, Margaret;
(2002)
Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry
Article
Nicholas W. Gillham;
(2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism
Book
Rushton, Alan R.;
(2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939
Article
Pence, Charles H.;
(2011)
“Describing Our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson
Article
Charles H. Pence;
(2022)
Of stirps and chromosomes: Generality through detail
Chapter
Gayon, Jean;
(2007)
Karl Pearson ou les enjeux du phénoménalisme dans les sciences biologiques vers 1900
Article
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2014)
The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance
Article
Tabery, James G.;
(2004)
The `Evolutionary Synthesis' of George Udny Yule
Article
Farrall, Lyndsay A.;
(1975)
Controversy and conflict in science: A case study--The English biometric school and Mendel's laws
Article
Bernardino Fantini;
(2017)
“Treasure your exceptions!” (William Bateson, 1908): leggi e variazioni nella genetica mendeliana
Article
Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr;
(2012)
Um representante do estilo de pensamento científico “compreensivo,” William Bateson (1861--1926): ciência, política e arte
Article
Tabery, James;
(2008)
R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype--Environment Interaction
Article
María González-Moreno;
Cristian Saborido;
David Teira;
(2015)
Disease-mongering through clinical trials
Article
Magnello, M. Eileen;
(2009)
Karl Pearson and the Establishment of Mathematical Statistics
Article
Radick, Gregory;
(2013)
The Professor and the Pea: Lives and Afterlives of William Bateson's Campaign for the Utility of Mendelism
Article
Richmond, Marsha L.;
(2001)
Women in the Early History of Genetics: William Bateson and the Newnham College Mendelians, 1900--1910
Book
Simunek, Michal;
(2011)
The Letters on G. J. Mendel: Correspondence of William Bateson, Hugo Iltis, and Erich Von Tschermak-Seysenegg with Alois and Ferdinand Schindler, 1902--1935
Article
Richmond, Marsha L.;
(2006)
The “Domestication” of Heredity: The Familial Organization of Geneticists at Cambridge University, 1895--1910
Be the first to comment!