Article ID: CBB168466083

Empresas biotecnológicas y divulgación de la ciencia. El caso de las pymes biotecnológicas asentadas en parques biotecnológicos de Andalucía (2016)

unapi

ABSTRACT Biotech companies cannot ignore the social interest they arouse in this age of knowledge; this interest raises expectations and fears, and meeting the demand created is not only the responsibility of government agencies. To analyse the situation this paper focuses on 32 SMEs based in four Technology Parks in Andalusia. We use a variety of methods to examine their presence in the local newspapers in their respective provinces; what areas their websites cover and find the opinion of their managers on various aspects of their communications. The results revealed an absence of dialogue between society and these firms. It might be necessary for SMEs to integrate disclosure mechanisms within their communication strategies and their CSR; however, their executives did not repudiate the public as an audience, but have not found the tools to bridge this gap. RESUMEN Las empresas biotecnológicas no pueden desestimar que el interés social por esa franja de conocimiento es muy alto, genera expectativas y recelos, y cubrir esa demanda no solo compete a los organismos públicos. Para comprobar cuál es su realidad enfocamos en este trabajo a las 32 pymes asentadas en cuatro parques tecnológicos de Andalucía. Utilizamos metodologías variadas para comprobar cómo es su presencia en los periódicos locales de referencia en sus respectivas provincias; qué ámbitos cubren sus sitios web y cuál es la opinión de sus gestores sobre diferentes aspectos de su comunicación. Los resultados nos llevan a concluir que no existe diálogo entre la sociedad y estas empresas, paso ineludible para que las pymes integren mecanismos de divulgación como elementos de su comunicación y de su RSC; sin embargo, sus ejecutivos no repudian a la ciudadanía como público, si bien no han localizado las herramientas que solucionen tal desconexión.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB168466083/

Similar Citations

Article Flavio D'Abramo; Sybille Neumeyer; (2020)
A Historical and Political Epistemology of Microbes (/isis/citation/CBB158989443/)

Article Welsh, Rick; Glenna, Leland; (2006)
Considering the Role of the University in Conducting Research on Agri-biotechnologies (/isis/citation/CBB000780215/)

Article Gelfert, Axel; (2013)
Before Biopolis: Representations of the Biotechnology Discourse in Singapore (/isis/citation/CBB001253170/)

Article Gerard Sasges; (2021)
Mold’s Dominion: Science, Empire, and Capitalism in a Globalizing World (/isis/citation/CBB369638636/)

Book Hughes, Sally Smith; (2011)
Genentech: The Beginnings of Biotech (/isis/citation/CBB001221219/)

Article Bud, Robert; (2010)
From Applied Microbiology to Biotechnology: Science, Medicine and Industrial Renewal (/isis/citation/CBB001022750/)

Book Carlson, Robert H.; (2010)
Biology Is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life (/isis/citation/CBB001251428/)

Book Sargent, William; (2002)
Crab Wars: A Tale of Horseshoe Crabs, Bioterrorism, and Human Health (/isis/citation/CBB000550920/)

Thesis Frank, Jeffrey Evan; (2001)
The Biotechnology Industry in the United States: Formulating a Conceptual Industry Model (/isis/citation/CBB001562553/)

Article Waldby, Catherine; (2009)
Singapore Biopolis: Bare Life in the City-State (/isis/citation/CBB000932553/)

Article Ladisch, Michael; (Fall 2004)
The Role of Bioprocess Engineering in Biotechnology (/isis/citation/CBB797536569/)

Book Jasanoff, Sheila; (2005)
Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (/isis/citation/CBB000641621/)

Book Magnus, David; Caplan, Arthur L.; McGee, Glenn; (2002)
Who Owns Life? (/isis/citation/CBB000302355/)

Chapter Reilly, Philip R.; (2008)
The How of Biotechnology (/isis/citation/CBB000953886/)

Book Ton van Helvoort; Eric Berkers; Mila Davids; (2017)
Biotechnologie: van wetenschap naar winkelschap revisited: een historische analyse van de Biotech bij multinational Unilever (/isis/citation/CBB491047684/)

Book Kent H. Redford; William M. Adams; (2021)
Strange Natures: Conservation in the Era of Synthetic Biology (/isis/citation/CBB135931569/)

Chapter Matthew Holmes; (2018)
Crops in a Machine: Industrialising Barley Breeding in Twentieth-century Britain (/isis/citation/CBB522148861/)

Thesis Duffin, Andrew Philip; (2003)
Fill the Earth and Subdue It: The Environmental Consequences of Intensive Agriculture in the Palouse (/isis/citation/CBB001562032/)

Article Derek Byerlee; (2020)
The globalization of hybrid maize, 1921–70 (/isis/citation/CBB392738548/)

Authors & Contributors
Sasges, Gerard
Kent H. Redford
Neumeyer, Sybille
Ladisch, Michael
Davids, Mila
Derek Byerlee
Journals
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Social Studies of Science
Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Journal of Global History
Centaurus: International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science, and Technology
British Journal for the History of Science
Publishers
Washington State University
University of Maryland, College Park
Yale University Press
University Press of New England
University of Chicago Press
Stichting Historie der Techniek
Concepts
Biotechnology industry
Biotechnology
Agriculture
Science and industry
Science and politics
Government sponsored science
People
Jōkichi Takamine
Margulis, Lynn
Calmette, Albert
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
20th century
20th century, early
19th century
Places
United States
Singapore
Europe
Great Britain
England
Edinburgh
Institutions
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Royal Society of London
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment