The “Instrumental Revolution” in chemistry refers to a transitional period in the mid-20th century during which sophisticated instrumentation based on physical principles was introduced to solve chemical problems. Historical and philosophical reflection on whether the revolution was a scientific one has been dominated by general models of scientific revolution, in particular, those proposed by Thomas Kuhn, I. B. Cohen and Ian Hacking. In this article I propose that the Industrial Revolution is a useful model for understanding the transformation wrought by the increasingly important role of machines in chemical research. Drawing on Marx's analysis of that event, I argue that that the Instrumental Revolution bears a striking resemblance to the industrial one. I offer grounds for thinking that the resemblance is not fortuitous, but rather reflects a general pattern of development involving the mechanization of the labor process. It is suggested that the cognitive consequences of radical changes in the means of production, as exemplified in the Instrumental Revolution, warrant the consideration of whether the latter is an instance of a kind of revolution in science rather than a singular episode.
...More
Article
Gordin, Michael D.;
Milam, Erika Lorraine;
(2012)
A Repository for More than Anecdote: Fifty Years of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(/isis/citation/CBB001252330/)
Article
Sturm, Thomas;
Mülberger, Annette;
(2012)
Crisis Discussions in Psychology---New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001221625/)
Article
Luca Sciortino;
(2021)
The emergence of objectivity: Fleck, Foucault, Kuhn and Hacking
(/isis/citation/CBB779990178/)
Book
Andersen, Hanne;
Barker, Peter;
Chen, Xiang;
(2006)
The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(/isis/citation/CBB000640006/)
Book
Kindi, Vasso P.;
Arabatzis, Theodore;
(2012)
Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB001421709/)
Article
Dyson, Freeman J.;
(2012)
Is Science Mostly Driven by Ideas or by Tools?
(/isis/citation/CBB001320450/)
Article
Baumeister, Alan A.;
Hawkins, Mike F.;
(2005)
Continuity and Discontinuity in the Historical Development of Modern Psychopharmacology
(/isis/citation/CBB000600110/)
Article
Radin Dardashti;
(2021)
No-go Theorems: What Are They Good For?
(/isis/citation/CBB827243285/)
Chapter
Carsten Reinhardt;
(2016)
Experimental Turnaround, 360°: The Essential Kuhn Circle
(/isis/citation/CBB569537527/)
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul;
(2010)
Discussion: Kuhn's Evolutionary Analogy in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and “The Road since Structure”
(/isis/citation/CBB001230091/)
Article
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti;
(2010)
Kuhn on Essentialism and the Causal Theory of Reference
(/isis/citation/CBB001230089/)
Thesis
Yohe, James Dale;
(2006)
A Reexamination of The Structure of Scientific Revolution and Application: The Rise of Mathematical Economics
(/isis/citation/CBB001561622/)
Article
Blumenthal, Geoffrey;
(2013)
Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution: A Re-Assessment
(/isis/citation/CBB001211809/)
Book
Otero, Mario;
(1997)
Kuhn Hoy
(/isis/citation/CBB000110630/)
Book
Juan Vicente Mayoral de Lucas;
(2017)
Thomas S. Kuhn: la búsqueda de la estructura
(/isis/citation/CBB101471819/)
Article
Eric Oberheim;
(2016)
Rediscovering Einstein's Legacy: How Einstein Anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the Nature of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB864838341/)
Article
Casado, Carlo M. Madrid;
(2013)
Spain and the Scientific Revolution: State of the Art of a Century-Old Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB001320135/)
Article
(2000)
Kuhn, Cognitive Science, and Conceptual Change
(/isis/citation/CBB000110564/)
Article
Wray, K. Brad;
(2010)
Kuhn's Constructionism
(/isis/citation/CBB001034602/)
Article
Eli I. Lichtenstein;
(2021)
(Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice
(/isis/citation/CBB459964165/)
Be the first to comment!