Marris, Claire (Author)
Calvert, Jane (Author)
In this paper, we reflect on our experience as science and technology studies (STS) researchers who were members of the working group that produced A Synthetic Biology Roadmap for the UK in 2012. We explore how this initiative sought to govern an uncertain future and describe how it was successfully used to mobilize public funds for synthetic biology from the UK government. We discuss our attempts to incorporate the insights and sensibilities of STS into the policy process and why we chose to use the concept of responsible research and innovation to do so. We analyze how the roadmapping process, and the final report, narrowed and transformed our contributions to the roadmap. We show how difficult it is for STS researchers to influence policy when our ideas challenge deeply entrenched pervasive assumptions, framings, and narratives about how technological innovation necessarily leads to economic progress, about public reticence as a roadblock to that progress, and about the supposed separation between science and society. We end by reflecting on the constraints under which we were operating from the outset and on the challenges for STS in policy.
...More
Article
Emma Frow;
(2020)
From “Experiments of Concern” to “Groups of Concern”: Constructing and Containing Citizens in Synthetic Biology
Article
Amy Hinterberger;
(2020)
Regulating Estrangement: Human–Animal Chimeras in Postgenomic Biology
Article
Sveta Milyaeva;
Daniel Neyland;
(2023)
Let’s agree to agree: The situational academic quality of the UK REF as consensual public knowledge
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
Article
Anja Bauer;
Alexander Bogner;
(2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues
Book
A. Balmer;
K. Bulpin;
S. Molyneux-Hodgson;
(2016)
Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices
Article
Markku Lehtonen;
(2023)
Brand New or More of the Same Nuclear? (De)Constructing the Economic Promise of the European Pressurised Reactor in France and the UK
Article
Alina Geampana;
Manuela Perrotta;
(2023)
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production
Article
Giulia Cavaliere;
James Rupert Fletcher;
(2022)
Age-discriminated IVF Access and Evidence-based Ageism: Is There a Better Way?
Article
Lukas Engelmann;
Catherine M Montgomery;
Steve Sturdy;
Cristina Moreno Lozano;
(2023)
Domesticating models: On the contingency of Covid-19 modelling in UK media and policy
Article
Samantha Vanderslott;
Alexandra Palmer;
Tonia Thomas;
Beth Greenhough;
Arabella Stuart;
John A. Henry;
Marcus English;
Rebecca de Water Naude;
Maia Patrick-Smith;
Naomi Douglas;
Maria Moore;
Susanne H. Hodgson;
Katherine R. W. Emary;
Andrew J. Pollard;
(2023)
Co-producing Human and Animal Experimental Subjects: Exploring the Views of UK COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participants on Animal Testing
Article
Lambros Roumbanis;
(2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
Article
Axel Philipps;
Leonie Weißenborn;
(December 2019)
Unconventional ideas conventionally arranged: A study of grant proposals for exceptional research
Article
Sara Giordano;
(May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics
Article
Jane Calvery;
Pablo Schyfter;
(April 2017)
What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’
Article
Massimiliano Simons;
(2021)
Synthetic biology as a technoscience: The case of minimal genomes and essential genes
Article
Hannah Landecker;
(2016)
It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds
Article
Hub Zwart;
(2020)
Friedrich Engels and the Technoscientific Reproducibility of Life: Synthetic Cells as Case Material for Practicing Dialectics of Science Today
Thesis
Kouper, Inna;
(2011)
The Meanings of (Synthetic) Life: A Study of Science Information as Discourse
Article
Annie Hammang;
(2025)
Troubleshooting: The Automation of Synthetic Biology and the Labor of Technological Futures
Be the first to comment!