Contentions about the origin of early modern empiricism have been floating about at least since the 1980s, where its exclusive “Britishness” was initially question, and the name of Gassendi was provocatively put forward as the putative “founder” of the current to the detriment of Francis Bacon. Recent scholarship has shown that early modern empiricism did not derive from philosophical speculation exclusively but had multiple sources and “foundations.” Yet, from a historical viewpoint, the question whether Bacon’s method had any influence on the origin and development of Gassendi’s version of empiricism still carries significance, for its answer may open up different views on how the relation between British and “continental” empiricisms shall be framed. In this paper, I deal with Gassendi’s reception of Bacon. On the basis of a deep examination of Gassendi’s corpus, I contend that there is no trace of [End Page 327] a consistent influence of Bacon on Gassendi’s empiricism before 1650s; although I show that an indirect influence can be found through the mediation of Peiresc, I put forward the hypothesis that it was more the empirical attitude characterizing Peiresc’s intellectual figure, rather than his interest in Baconianism, to be relevant, along with Epicurus’ philosophy, for Gassendi’s early empiricism. I then analyze Gassendi’s treatment of Bacon’s logic in Gassendi’s Syntagma philosophicum. I show that despite Gassendi’s sympathy for Bacon’s project, his own logic lays on fundamentally different assumptions. Despite this, I argue for Gassendi’s reception of Bacon’s theory of the idols in Syntagma philosophicum. On this basis, I conclude by restating the untenability of “national” accounts of the rise of empiricism, and the importance of highlighting instead the sharing of ideas between its actors.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Sorana Corneanu;
(2021)
Logic and the Movement of Reasoning: Pierre Gassendi on the Three Acts of the Mind
Chapter
Waldow, Anik;
(2010)
Empiricism and Its Roots in the Ancient Medical Tradition
Book
Fisher, Saul;
(2005)
Pierre Gassendi's Philosophy and Science: Atomism for Empiricists
Book
Delphine Bellis;
Daniel Garber;
Carla Rita Palmerino;
(2024)
Pierre Gassendi: Humanism, Science, and the Birth of Modern Philosophy
Chapter
McCanles, Michael;
(2005)
The New Science and the Via Negativa: A Mystical Source for Baconian Empiricism
Chapter
Klein, Jürgen;
(2008)
Francis Bacon's Scientia Operativa, the Tradition of the Workshops, and the Secrets of Nature
Book
Rossi, Paolo;
(2000)
Logic and the Art of Memory: The Quest for a Universal Language
Article
Fletcher, Angus;
(2005)
Francis Bacon's Forms and the Logic of Ramist Conversion
Article
Rodolfo Garau;
(2020)
Gassendi's Critique of Astrology
Article
Zagorin, Perez;
(2001)
Francis Bacon's concept of objectivity and the idols of the mind
Thesis
Porter, Dahlia;
(2007)
“Knowledge Broken”: Empiricist Method and the Forms of Romanticism
Book
Asad Q. Ahmed;
(2022)
Palimpsests of Themselves: Logic and Commentary in Postclassical Muslim South Asia
Chapter
Clericuzio, Antonio;
(1997)
Alchimia e teorie della materia nel Seicento
Thesis
Hiscock, Dawn M.;
(1997)
Science and scepticism in the 17th century
Book
Parrini, Paolo;
Salmon, Wesley C.;
Salmon, Merrilee H.;
(2003)
Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
Article
Isaac, Joel;
(2013)
Donald Davidson and the Analytic Revolution in American Philosophy, 1940--1970
Book
Giuseppe Guastamacchia;
(2024)
Il tempo ritrovato. Scritti per Massimo Ferrari
Chapter
Friedrich Stadler;
(2024)
The Vienna Circle and Philosophy of Social Sciences
Book
Sami Pihlström;
Friedrich Stadler;
Niels Weidtmann;
(2017)
Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism
Book
Christian Damböck;
Günther Sandner;
Meike G. Werner;
(2022)
Logischer Empirismus, Lebensreform und die deutsche Jugendbewegung: Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement
Be the first to comment!