Melanie Smallman (Author)
That policymakers adopt technoscientific viewpoints and lack reflexivity is a common criticism of scientific decision-making, particularly in response to moves to democratize science. Drawing on interviews with UK-based national policymakers, I argue that an elite sociotechnical imaginary of ‘science to the rescue’ shapes how public perspectives are heard and distinguishes what is considered to be legitimate expertise. The machinery of policy-making has become shaped around this imaginary – particularly its focus on science as a problem-solver and on social and ethical issues as ‘nothing to do with the science’ – and this gives this viewpoint its power, persistence and endurance. With this imaginary at the heart of policy-making machinery, regardless of the perspectives of the policymakers, alternative views of science are either forced to take the form of the elite imaginary in order to be processed, or they simply cannot be accounted for within the policy-making processes. In this way, the elite sociotechnical imaginary (and technoscientific viewpoint) is enacted, but also elicited and perpetuated, without the need for policymakers to engage with or even be aware of the imaginary underpinning their actions.
...MoreArticle Sergio Sismondo (August 2020) Sociotechnical imaginaries: An accidental themed issue. Social Studies of Science (pp. 505-507).
Article
Yevgeniya Tomkiv;
Astrid Liland;
Deborah H. Oughton;
Brian Wynne;
(2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB106267662/)
Article
Seungmi Chung;
Kun Hee Kim;
Yeseul Park;
Hyomin Kim;
(2021)
A Site of Bounded Imaginaries: Local Narratives of Buan after Protests against a Nuclear Waste Repository
(/isis/citation/CBB959012966/)
Article
Sung Hwan Kim;
Hyomin Kim;
Sungsoo Song;
(September 2020)
Public Deliberation on South Korean Nuclear Power Plants: How Can Lay Knowledge Resist against Expertise?
(/isis/citation/CBB276383449/)
Article
Bert Toussaint;
(August 2019)
(Transport) history as policy lab for democratic governance
(/isis/citation/CBB608036589/)
Article
Harry Collins;
Robert Evans;
Weinel;
(August 2016)
STS as science or politics?
(/isis/citation/CBB795627192/)
Article
Luis Reyes-Galindo;
(January 2017)
Molecular Detector (Non)Technology in Mexico
(/isis/citation/CBB757495306/)
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Jannik Schritt;
Volkan Sayman;
(February 2022)
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation
(/isis/citation/CBB229106240/)
Article
Bruno M. L. Pinto;
José L. Costa;
Henrique N. Cabral;
(2017)
How Do Science Communication Practitioners View Scientists and Audiences in Relation to Public Engagement Activities? A Research Note Concerning the Marine Sciences in Portugal
(/isis/citation/CBB523457002/)
Article
Barbara L. Allen;
(November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region
(/isis/citation/CBB069762669/)
Article
Christy Spackman;
Gary A. Burlingame;
(June 2018)
Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production
(/isis/citation/CBB215070697/)
Article
Jaya Keaney;
(2022)
The Racializing Womb: Surrogacy and Epigenetic Kinship
(/isis/citation/CBB389875479/)
Article
Marianne Ryghaug;
Tomas Moe Skjølsvold;
Sara Heidenreich;
(April 2018)
Creating energy citizenship through material participation
(/isis/citation/CBB950810562/)
Article
Thomas Völker;
Ângela Guimarães Pereira;
(2023)
“What Was That Word? It’s Part of Ensuring Its Future Existence” Exploring Engagement Collectives at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre
(/isis/citation/CBB083165853/)
Article
Shi Lin Loh;
Sulfikar Amir;
(June 2019)
Healing Fukushima: Radiation hazards and disaster medicine in post-3.11 Japan
(/isis/citation/CBB754363980/)
Article
Dow Schüll, Natusha;
Zaloom, Caitlin;
(August 2011)
The shortsighted brain: Neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time
(/isis/citation/CBB240640662/)
Article
Elina I. Mäkinen;
(March 2018)
Action in the Space Between: From Latent to Active Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB718195671/)
Article
Christopher Lawless;
(2020)
Assembling airspace: The Single European Sky and contested transnationalities of European air traffic management
(/isis/citation/CBB169587089/)
Article
John Gardner;
(September 2017)
Accelerating Innovation in the Creation of Biovalue: The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult
(/isis/citation/CBB000462445/)
Article
Benjamin K Sovacool;
Noam Bergman;
Debbie Hopkins;
Kirsten EH Jenkins;
Sabine Hielscher;
Andreas Goldthau;
Brent Brossmann;
(August 2020)
Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: Valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future
(/isis/citation/CBB482828082/)
Article
Les Levidow;
Sujatha Raman;
(August 2020)
Sociotechnical imaginaries of low-carbon waste-energy futures: UK techno-market fixes displacing public accountability
(/isis/citation/CBB350275299/)
Be the first to comment!