As a practicing physician and longtime member of his hospital’s ethics committee, Dr. Barron Lerner thought he had heard it all. But in the mid-1990s, his father, an infectious diseases physician, told him a stunning story: he had physically placed his body over an end-stage patient who had stopped breathing, preventing his colleagues from performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, even though CPR was the ethically and legally accepted thing to do. Over the next few years, the senior Dr. Lerner tried to speed the deaths of his seriously ill mother and mother-in-law to spare them further suffering. These stories angered and alarmed the younger Dr. Lerner—an internist, historian of medicine, and bioethicist—who had rejected physician-based paternalism in favor of informed consent and patient autonomy. The Good Doctor is a fascinating and moving account of how Dr. Lerner came to terms with two very different images of his father: a revered clinician, teacher, and researcher who always put his patients first, but also a physician willing to “play God,” opposing the very revolution in patients' rights that his son was studying and teaching to his own medical students. But the elder Dr. Lerner’s journals, which he had kept for decades, showed the son how the father’s outdated paternalism had grown out of a fierce devotion to patient-centered medicine, which was rapidly disappearing. And they raised questions: Are paternalistic doctors just relics, or should their expertise be used to overrule patients and families that make ill-advised choices? Does the growing use of personalized medicine—in which specific interventions may be best for specific patients—change the calculus between autonomy and paternalism? And how can we best use technologies that were invented to save lives but now too often prolong death? In an era of high-technology medicine, spiraling costs, and health-care reform, these questions could not be more relevant. As his father slowly died of Parkinson’s disease, Barron Lerner faced these questions both personally and professionally. He found himself being pulled into his dad’s medical care, even though he had criticized his father for making medical decisions for his relatives. Did playing God—at least in some situations—actually make sense? Did doctors sometimes “know best”? A timely and compelling story of one family’s engagement with medicine over the last half century, The Good Doctor is an important book for those who treat illness—and those who struggle to overcome it.
...MoreReview Laura Stark (2015) Review of "The Good Doctor: A Father, a Son, and the Evolution of Medical Ethics". Social History of Medicine (pp. 925-926).
Article
Lerner, Barron H.;
(2004)
Beyond Informed Consent: Did Cancer Patients Challenge Their Physicians in the Post-World War II Era?
(/isis/citation/CBB000774444/)
Article
Burnham, John C.;
(2014)
Why Sociologists Abandoned the Sick Role Concept
(/isis/citation/CBB001214382/)
Book
Koch, Tom;
(2014)
Thieves of Virtue: When Bioethics Stole Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB001550877/)
Article
Silvia Siano;
(2020)
Albert R. Jonsen: one of the most important pioneers of Bioethics and Clinical Ethics. An historical portrait
(/isis/citation/CBB595476468/)
Book
Skloot, Rebecca;
(2010)
The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks
(/isis/citation/CBB438514916/)
Article
Paolo Savoia;
(2016)
The Book of the Sick of Santa Maria della Morte in Bologna and the Medical Organization of a Hospital in the Sixteenth-Century
(/isis/citation/CBB159263524/)
Chapter
Emmanuel Betta;
(2021)
«L’ultima bufera antivaccinista». Il dibattito sulla vaccinazione in Italia tra XIX e XX secolo
(/isis/citation/CBB678542069/)
Article
Jennifer J. Connor;
(2021)
Labrador Emergencies and St. Anthony Institutional Care: Medical Cases of Donald McI. Johnson for the Grenfell Association, 1928–29
(/isis/citation/CBB738934711/)
Book
Diana Peschier;
(2019)
Lost Souls: Women, Religion and Mental Illness in the Victorian Asylum
(/isis/citation/CBB291963494/)
Article
Ludmilla Jordanova;
(2021)
Medicine and the Senses: Towards Integrative Practices
(/isis/citation/CBB637432584/)
Article
Gainty, Caitjan;
(2012)
“Going after the High-Brows”: Frank Gilbreth and the Surgical Subject, 1912--1917
(/isis/citation/CBB001320018/)
Article
Stephen Pender;
(2020)
Falling from horses: medical controversy in early eighteenth-century England
(/isis/citation/CBB436543320/)
Article
Wannell, Louise;
(2007)
Patients' Relatives and Psychiatric Doctors: Letter Writing in the York Retreat, 1875--1910
(/isis/citation/CBB000772504/)
Thesis
DeCoster, Barry;
(2006)
Towards a Pragmatic Theory of Medical Explanations of Disease
(/isis/citation/CBB001561718/)
Article
Theriot, Nancy M.;
(2001)
Negotiating illness: Doctors, patients, and families in the nineteenth century
(/isis/citation/CBB000100642/)
Book
Maria Malatesta;
(2021)
L’invenzione della fiducia: Medici e pazienti dall’età classica a oggi
(/isis/citation/CBB294897789/)
Article
Morrison, Hazel;
(2013)
Conversing with the Psychiatrist: Patient Narratives within Glasgow's Royal Asylum, 1921--1929
(/isis/citation/CBB001320813/)
Chapter
Davide Festi;
(2021)
Costruire un medico degno di fiducia
(/isis/citation/CBB079043752/)
Chapter
Maria Luisa Betri;
(2021)
Dalla 'sconfidenza' nel medico al ricorso al 'cultore di una scienza di fiducia'
(/isis/citation/CBB369599315/)
Chapter
Valentina Cappi;
(2021)
Senza trucco o con l’inganno: la travagliata conquista della fiducia nelle serie tv ospedaliere
(/isis/citation/CBB664284786/)
Be the first to comment!