A prominent type of scientific realism holds that some important parts of our best current scientific theories are at least approximately true. According to such realists, radically distinct alternatives to these theories, or theory-parts, are unlikely to be approximately true. Thus, one might be tempted to argue, as the prominent anti-realist Kyle Stanford recently did, that realists of this kind have little or no reason to encourage scientists to attempt to identify and develop theoretical alternatives that are radically distinct from currently accepted theories in the relevant respects. In other words, it may seem that realists should recommend that scientists be relatively conservative in their theoretical endeavors. This paper aims to show that this argument is mistaken. While realists should indeed be less optimistic of finding radically distinct alternatives to replace current theories, realists also have greater reasons to value the outcomes of such searches. Interestingly, this holds both for successful and failed attempts to identify and develop such alternative theories.
...MoreArticle Adrian Currie (2019) Creativity, conservativeness & the social epistemology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 1-4).
Similar Citations
Article
Lorenzo Spagnesi;
(2023)
Regulative idealization: A Kantian approach to idealized models
(/isis/citation/CBB336211505/)
Book
Groff, Ruth;
(2004)
Critical Realism, Post-Positivism, and the Possibility of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000401064/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Fiora Salis;
(2021)
The New Fiction View of Models
(/isis/citation/CBB270986404/)
Book
Collin Rice;
(2021)
Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB912709886/)
Article
Ivic, Sanja;
(2013)
The Truth as a Non-Reference: Realist and Antirealist Conception of Reference
(/isis/citation/CBB001253031/)
Book
Psillos, Stathis;
(1999)
Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth
(/isis/citation/CBB000110803/)
Article
Redhead, Michael;
Lipton, Peter;
Douven, Igor;
Bueno, Otávio;
(2001)
Quests of a Realist
(/isis/citation/CBB000100398/)
Article
Schmaltz, Tad M.;
(2003)
Cartesian Causation: Body--Body Interaction, Motion, and Eternal Truths
(/isis/citation/CBB000340900/)
Book
Meheus, Joke;
(2002)
Inconsistency in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000201632/)
Book
Lehrich, Christopher I.;
(2007)
The Occult Mind: Magic in Theory and Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB000774186/)
Book
Lynch, Michael Patrick;
(2004)
True to Life: Why Truth Matters
(/isis/citation/CBB000471545/)
Book
Changeux, Jean-Pierre;
(2004)
Physiology of Truth: Neuroscience and Human Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000470159/)
Book
Tauber, Alfred I.;
(2009)
Science and the Quest for Meaning
(/isis/citation/CBB001021208/)
Article
Torsten Wilholt;
(2022)
Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry
(/isis/citation/CBB341914920/)
Chapter
Maria Carla Galavotti;
(2024)
Dalla scienza unificata al pluralismo, e dalla verità alla probabilità
(/isis/citation/CBB364170420/)
Chapter
Alessandro Dini;
(2024)
"Pensare per immagini". Cultura e religione nella riflessione di Vico
(/isis/citation/CBB692403197/)
Chapter
Alberto Giovanni Biuso;
(2024)
Sul metodo. Epistemologia e cosmologie
(/isis/citation/CBB554210349/)
Book
Molly A. Wallace;
Concetta V. Principe;
(2022)
From Cogito to Covid: Rethinking Lacan’s “Science and Truth”
(/isis/citation/CBB424873361/)
Article
David Merritt;
(2021)
Cosmological Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB244895079/)
Be the first to comment!