This paper compares Feyerabend's arguments in Science in a Free Society to the controversial theory of expertise proposed by Harry Collins and Robert Evans as a Third Wave of Science Studies. Is the legitimacy of democratic decisions threatened by the unquestioned authority of scientific advice? Or does, on the contrary, science need protection from too much democratic participation in technical decisions? Where Feyerabend's political relativism envisions democratic society as inherently pluralist and demands equal contribution of all traditions and worldviews to public decision-making, Collins and Evans hold a conception of elective modernism, defending the reality and value of technical expertise and arguing that science deserves a privileged status in modern democracies, because scientific values are also democratic values. I will argue that Feyerabend's political relativism provides a valuable framework for the evaluation of Collins' and Evans' theory of expertise. By constructing a dialog between Feyerabend and this more recent approach in Science and Technology Studies, the aim of this article is not only to show where the two positions differ and in what way they might be reconciled, but also how Feyerabend's philosophy provides substantial input to contemporary debate.
...MoreArticle Matthew J. Brown; Ian James Kidd (2016) Introduction: Reappraising Paul Feyerabend. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 1-8).
Book
Lee McIntyre;
(2021)
How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason
(/isis/citation/CBB702116961/)
Article
Matthew J. Brown;
(2016)
The Abundant World: Paul Feyerabend's Metaphysics of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB255917734/)
Article
Catherine Paradeise;
Ghislaine Filliatreau;
(2021)
Scientific Integrity Matters
(/isis/citation/CBB481223880/)
Article
Matthew Hayes;
Noah Morritt;
(2020)
Michael W. Burke-Gaffney and the UFO Debate in Atlantic Canada, 1947-1969
(/isis/citation/CBB417665220/)
Book
Liz Sevcenko;
(2022)
Public History for a Post-Truth Era: Fighting Denial through Memory Movements
(/isis/citation/CBB650942848/)
Article
Jasanoff, Sheila;
(2003)
Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, “The Third Wave of Science Studies”
(/isis/citation/CBB000651037/)
Essay Review
Mark P. Silverman;
(2017)
Scientific Controversies: Authentic and Contrived
(/isis/citation/CBB701452514/)
Book
David Harker;
(2015)
Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB156153688/)
Book
Clemens Maier-Wolthausen;
(2019)
Hauptstadt der Tiere: Die Geschichte des ältesten deutschen Zoos
(/isis/citation/CBB818940408/)
Article
Jing Zhu;
Mingjun Zhang;
Michael Weisberg;
(2020)
Why does the Chinese public accept evolution?
(/isis/citation/CBB639691803/)
Article
Davidson, Roei;
(2014)
Financial Markets and Authoritative Proximity in Personal Finance Magazines
(/isis/citation/CBB001420115/)
Book
Eugenia Tognotti;
(2020)
Vaccinare i bambini tra obbligo e persuasione: Tre secoli di controversie. Il caso dell'Italia
(/isis/citation/CBB142911314/)
Thesis
Kasey Marie Sease;
(2021)
Marketing Agencies for Science: Nonprofits, Public Science Education, and Capitalism in Modern America
(/isis/citation/CBB197222725/)
Book
Andrew Jewett;
(2020)
Science under Fire: Challenges to Scientific Authority in Modern America
(/isis/citation/CBB653749085/)
Thesis
Emily L. Howell;
(2019)
Science & the Authoritarian: Deference to Scientific Authority & How It Disables Democratic Deliberation on Controversial Science Issues
(/isis/citation/CBB957399527/)
Article
Kerr, Anne;
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah;
Tutton, Richard;
(2007)
Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue
(/isis/citation/CBB000780233/)
Article
Joris Mercelis;
(2020)
The scientist and the advertisement: Reklamegutachten in imperial Germany
(/isis/citation/CBB621920403/)
Book
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín;
Kristen Intemann;
(2018)
The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public
(/isis/citation/CBB549674958/)
Article
Forbes, Curtis;
(2011)
Science and Public Controversy: Editor's Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB001220690/)
Article
Mitchell Kiefer;
(2021)
Re-basing Scientific Authority: Anthropocene Narratives in the Carnegie Natural History Museum
(/isis/citation/CBB937863298/)
Be the first to comment!