Article ID: CBB113464170

Seeing and Unmaking Civilians in Afghanistan: Visual Technologies and Contested Professional Visions (November 2017)

unapi

Christiane Wilke (Author)


Science, Technology and Human Values
Volume: 42
Issue: 6
Pages: 1031-1060


Publication Date: November 2017
Edition Details: Special Issue: Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security
Language: English

While the distinction between civilians and combatants is fundamental to international law, it is contested and complicated in practice. How do North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) officers see civilians in Afghanistan? Focusing on 2009 air strike in Kunduz, this article argues that the professional vision of NATO officers relies not only on recent military technologies that allow for aerial surveillance, thermal imaging, and precise targeting but also on the assumptions, vocabularies, modes of attention, and hierarchies of knowledges that the officers bring to the interpretation of aerial surveillance images. Professional vision is socially situated and frequently contested with communities of practice. In the case of the Kunduz air strike, the aerial vantage point and the military visual technologies cannot fully determine what would be seen. Instead, the officers’ assumptions about Afghanistan, threats, and the gender of the civilian inform the vocabulary they use for coding people and places as civilian or noncivilian. Civilians are not simply “found,” they are produced through specific forms of professional vision.

...More
Included in

Article Lucy Suchman; Karolina Follis; Jutta Weber (November 2017) Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security: (Introduction). Science, Technology and Human Values (pp. 983-1002). unapi

Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB113464170/

Similar Citations

Article Lucy Suchman; Karolina Follis; Jutta Weber; (November 2017)
Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security: (Introduction) (/isis/citation/CBB721841161/)

Book Gilliom, John; Monahan, Torin; (2013)
SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society (/isis/citation/CBB001421286/)

Article Shana Lee Hirsch; Jerrold Long; (March 2021)
Adaptive Epistemologies: Conceptualizing Adaptation to Climate Change in Environmental Science (/isis/citation/CBB087611495/)

Article Benjamin K. Sovacool; David J. Hess; (October 2017)
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change (/isis/citation/CBB756258184/)

Book Kevin Howley; (2018)
Drones: Media Discourse and the Public Imagination (/isis/citation/CBB047987646/)

Article Erin A. Cech; Anneke Metz; Jessie L. Smith; Karen deVries; (September 2017)
Epistemological Dominance and Social Inequality: Experiences of Native American Science, Engineering, and Health Students (/isis/citation/CBB816459691/)

Article Elise K Burton; (October 2018)
Narrating ethnicity and diversity in Middle Eastern national genome projects (/isis/citation/CBB002865583/)

Article Brian Salter; (January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology (/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)

Article Benjamin K. Sovacool; Katherine Lovell; Marie Blanche Ting; (November 2018)
Reconfiguration, Contestation, and Decline: Conceptualizing Mature Large Technical Systems (/isis/citation/CBB797225432/)

Article Sam Weiss Evans; Matthias Leese; Dagmar Rychnovská; (April 2021)
Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration (/isis/citation/CBB461668631/)

Article Rebecca Slayton; (January 2021)
Governing Uncertainty or Uncertain Governance? Information Security and the Challenge of Cutting Ties (/isis/citation/CBB911361449/)

Article Chih-yuan Yang; Bronislaw Szerszynski; Brian Wynne; (September 2018)
The Making of Power Shortage: The Sociotechnical Imaginary of Nationalist High Modernism and Its Pragmatic Rationality in Electricity Planning in Taiwan (/isis/citation/CBB183913124/)

Article Sheila Jasanoff; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (December 2017)
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures (/isis/citation/CBB640965055/)

Article Jaakko Taipale; (June 2019)
Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise (/isis/citation/CBB635897203/)

Authors & Contributors
Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Doorn, Neelke
deVries, Karen
Fatima K. Espinoza Vasquez
Ting, Marie Blanche
Cech, Erin A.
Journals
Science, Technology and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Publishers
Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
University of Chicago Press
Concepts
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Sociotechnical systems
Surveillance
Ethnicity
Imaginaries
Technology and society
People
Rawls, John
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
Places
United States
Middle and Near East
Columbia River
Puerto Rico
Turkey
China
Institutions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment