Koskinen, Inkeri (Author)
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume: 71
Issue: 4
Pages: 1187-1207
When discussing scientific objectivity, many philosophers of science have recently focused on accounts that can be applied in practice when assessing the objectivity of something. It has become clear that in different contexts, objectivity is realized in different ways, and the many senses of objectivity recognized in the recent literature seem to be conceptually distinct. I argue that these diverse ‘applicable’ senses of scientific objectivity have more in common than has thus far been recognized. I combine arguments from philosophical discussions of trust, from negative accounts of objectivity, and from the recent literature on epistemic risks. When we call X objective, we endorse it: we say that we rely on X, and that others should do so too. But the word ‘objective’ is reserved for a specific type of reliance: it is based on the belief that important epistemic risks arising from our imperfections as epistemic agents have been effectively averted. All the positive senses of objectivity identify either some risk of this type, or some efficient strategy for averting one or more such risks. 1. Introduction2. Applicable Notions of Objectivity3. Reliance Instead of Trust4. Epistemic Risks Arising from Our Imperfections as Epistemic Agents Rather Than Subjectivity5. The Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity6. Is This Useful?7. Conclusion
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Evandro Agazzi;
(2014)
Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB896368292/)
Article
Pietro Gori;
(2021)
Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Postempiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB711827914/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Book
Debru, Claude;
Nouvel, Pascal;
(2003)
Le possible et les biotechnologies: Essai de philosophie dans les sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB000772845/)
Chapter
Uus, Undo;
(2001)
The Glory and Misery of Modern Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000102685/)
Book
Susann Wagenknecht;
(2016)
A Social Epistemology of Research Groups
(/isis/citation/CBB612709257/)
Book
Giuseppe Boscarino;
(2016)
Le forme e i mutamenti della scienza
(/isis/citation/CBB208526052/)
Article
Cardellini, Liberato;
(2008)
The Views and Influence of Ernst Von Glasersfeld: An Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB000930622/)
Article
Pietro Daniel Omodeo;
(2020)
The Struggle for Objectivity: Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology
(/isis/citation/CBB011713085/)
Article
Isabel Waidner;
(2018)
Christian Bök's Xenotext Experiment, Conceptual Writing and the Subject-of-No-Subjectivity: "Pink Faeries and Gaudy Baubles"
(/isis/citation/CBB611832394/)
Article
Nowotny, Helga;
(1999)
The Place of People in Our Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000471289/)
Article
Israel, Giorgio;
(2005)
The Science of Complexity: Epistemological Problems and Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB000651669/)
Book
Tauber, Alfred I.;
(2009)
Science and the Quest for Meaning
(/isis/citation/CBB001021208/)
Chapter
Zittel, Claus;
(2010)
The Politics of Cognition: Genesis and Development of Ludwik Fleck's “Comparative Epistemology”
(/isis/citation/CBB001023239/)
Article
Torsten Wilholt;
(2022)
Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry
(/isis/citation/CBB341914920/)
Chapter
Marco Buzzoni;
(2024)
Evandro Agazzi: l'oggettività scientifica e i suoi contesti
(/isis/citation/CBB465677782/)
Thesis
Fagan, Melinda Bonnie;
(2007)
Objectivity in Practice: Integrative Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry
(/isis/citation/CBB001561365/)
Thesis
Conrad, Erich Charles;
(2008)
Science and Objectivity
(/isis/citation/CBB001561322/)
Book
Hasok Chang;
(2023)
Realism for Realistic People
(/isis/citation/CBB344233828/)
Book
Michela Massimi;
(2022)
Perspectival Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB041766673/)
Be the first to comment!