Kardel, Troels (Author)
In Part One of the Specimen of Elements of Myology, a book in three parts published in Florence 1667, Nicolaus Steno described the changes taking place between muscle relaxation and contraction in a two-stage geometrical model based on anatomical observations in man and animals. The ‘new myology’ was rejected by G.A. Borelli in 1680 and outright ridiculed by J. Bernoulli in 1694. The anatomical correctness and predictive value was rightfully acknowledged only towards the Millennium. In Part Two, the Canis …, Steno gave a detailed anatomical description of a giant shark’s head with focus on the likeness of its teeth and the so-called tongue stones, or “glossopetrae”, dug from the ground. Steno conjectured that remnants from sharks living in the past had become fossils due to chemical processes through interaction with the surrounding sediments at the bottom of the sea, presuming that the finding areas had been sea-covered. From studies in Part Three of reproductive organs in mammals, viviparous ray-fish and shark, he concluded that the so-called female testicles in women and mammals are analogous with ovaries of oviparous animals and should therefore be named accordingly. Two years later in the Prodromus De Solido intra Solidum, Steno described the transformation over time of sedimentary landscapes in Tuscany, and how crystals grow by accretion to the surface of entities derived from limpid sea-water or freshwater in caves. These are studies of time-related transformations of solids in organic and inorganic materials. However, such processes could not be documented by visual observation, since changes go too quickly in muscles, in the case of the landscapes because the transformations took place in the past. Thus, Steno and contemporaries put forward hypotheses on such hidden processes that were only gradually corroborated when fitting into a cluster of evidence. His considerations on crystal growth may have been triggered by an interest as a physician to know how saliva, gall and kidney stones are formed. Likewise, considerations on sharks’ replacement of their teeth could extend knowledge on dentition to bring a better cure for those who complain of being toothless. He emphasized the importance of mathematical methods to describe processes in the human body and cited from Galileo, Discourse on Bodies in Water (1612), in which physics outweighs Aristotelian rules to explain the interaction of solids and solvents. Likewise, Steno’s ‘New Myology’ was a showdown against an Aristotelean physical dogma from Physics VII: everything which moves is moved by another, which excluded fibre shortening in muscles and blinded researchers on muscle contraction for generations after Steno.
...More
Article
Stefano Dominici;
(2021)
A man with a master plan: Steno’s observations on earth’s history
(/isis/citation/CBB767123510/)
Book
Francesco Luzzini;
(2013)
Il miracolo inutile. Antonio Vallisneri e le scienze della Terra in Europa tra XVII e XVIII secolo
(/isis/citation/CBB451473673/)
Chapter
Hsu, Kuang-Tai;
(2009)
The Path to Steno's Synthesis on the Animal Origin of Glossopetrae
(/isis/citation/CBB001021039/)
Chapter
Kardel, Troels;
(2009)
Prompters of Steno's Geological Principles: Generation of Stones in Living Beings, Glossopetrae and Molding
(/isis/citation/CBB001021041/)
Chapter
Thomsen, Elsebeth;
(2009)
Niels Stensen---Steno, in the World of Collections and Museums
(/isis/citation/CBB001021038/)
Article
Kardel, Troels;
(2008)
Nicolaus Steno's New Myology (1667): Rather than Muscle, the Motor Fibre Should Be Called Animal's Organ of Movement
(/isis/citation/CBB000933719/)
Article
Silvio Menchetti;
(2021)
How do Crystals Grow? Steno’s Approach
(/isis/citation/CBB671869116/)
Article
Nuno Castel-Branco;
(2021)
Dissecting with numbers: mathematics in Nicolaus Steno’s early anatomical writings, 1661-64
(/isis/citation/CBB852055822/)
Article
Alan H. Cutler;
(2021)
Steno and the Rock Cycle
(/isis/citation/CBB133993345/)
Article
Massimo Aliverti;
(2021)
A letter by Nicolaus Steno about a cavern near Como
(/isis/citation/CBB479698684/)
Article
Stefano Dominici;
Gary D. Rosenberg;
(2021)
Introduction: Nicolaus Steno and earth science in early modern Italy
(/isis/citation/CBB445450656/)
Article
Alessandro Ottaviani;
(2021)
The Opposite Poles of a Debate - Lapides figurati and the Accademia dei Lincei
(/isis/citation/CBB770441261/)
Chapter
Morello, Nicoletta;
(2006)
Steno, the Fossils, the Rocks, and the Calendar of the Earth
(/isis/citation/CBB000740917/)
Book
Dario Generali;
(2008)
Antonio Vallisneri. La figura, il contesto, le immagini storiografiche
(/isis/citation/CBB623068781/)
Chapter
Yamada, Toshihiro;
(2009)
Hooke--Steno Relations Reconsidered: Reassessing the Roles of Ole Borch and Robert Boyle
(/isis/citation/CBB001021040/)
Article
Stefano, Waldir;
dos Reis, Mariana Inglez;
(2013)
Os primórdios da paleontologia moderna: as investigações de Steno sobre fósseis e estratos
(/isis/citation/CBB001214032/)
Chapter
Vai, Gian Battista;
(2009)
The Scientific Revolution and Nicholas Steno's Twofold Conversion
(/isis/citation/CBB001021047/)
Chapter
Cutler, Alan H.;
(2009)
Nicolaus Steno and the Problem of Deep Time
(/isis/citation/CBB001021043/)
Chapter
Rosenberg, Gary D.;
(2009)
The Measure of Man and Landscape in the Renaissance and Scientific Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB001021034/)
Chapter
Olden-Jørgensen, Sebastian;
(2009)
Nicholas Steno and René Descartes: A Cartesian Perspective on Steno's Scientific Development
(/isis/citation/CBB001021044/)
Be the first to comment!