In current discussions, human germline editing is often called ‘irresponsible’. Looking at the international summits on human gene editing held in 2015 and in 2018 and the announcement by He Jiankui of the birth of two gene-edited babies in November 2018, this article analyses how ‘irresponsible’ research was the result of various (dis)qualifications and demarcations. Against a background of discussions of responsibility, an individual scientist was singled out, his experiments were scrutinized for their soundness, legality and safety and ethical and moral stances were questioned. These are features of a process that I call ‘irresponsibilization’. This irresponsibilization of research is entangled with calls for further action: Irresponsible research like that of He Jiankui should be contained, the veracity of knowledge claims needs to be confirmed, and institutions and decision-makers are called to act. The controversy turned ‘irresponsible’ into an active category, and rendered explicit its political, institutional and practical ramifications.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Alyssa Botelho;
(2021)
The Insights of Radical Science in the CRISPR Gene-Editing Era: A History of Science for the People and the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB000261857/)
Book
John H. Evans;
(2020)
The Human Gene Editing Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB424000521/)
Article
Christian Ross;
(2022)
Handservant of Technocracy: Public Engagement and Expertise in Heritable Human Genome Editing
(/isis/citation/CBB828766557/)
Article
Clay Davis;
(December 2020)
Homo adhaerens: Risk and adherence in biomedical HIV prevention research
(/isis/citation/CBB559629478/)
Article
Andrew J. Hogan;
(2016)
From Precaution to Peril: Public Relations Across Forty Years of Genetic Engineering
(/isis/citation/CBB750225154/)
Article
Larry Au;
(2023)
Ethical choreography in China’s Human Gene Editing controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB421942539/)
Book
Sahotra Sarkar;
(2021)
Cut-and-Paste Genetics: A CRISPR Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB564028363/)
Book
Walter Isaacson;
(2021)
The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race
(/isis/citation/CBB677514543/)
Book
Jennifer A. Doudna;
Samuel H. Sternberg;
(2017)
A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB535457038/)
Article
Choon Key Chekar;
Hyomin Kim;
(2022)
COVID-19 Exceptionalism: Explaining South Korean Responses
(/isis/citation/CBB527253772/)
Article
Ashley Shew;
Keith Johnson;
(2018)
Companion Animals as Technologies in Biomedical Research
(/isis/citation/CBB234825566/)
Article
Jacobson, Arne;
Kammen, Daniel;
(Winter 2005)
Science and Engineering Research That Values the Planet
(/isis/citation/CBB337716604/)
Article
Todd M Olszewski;
(2018)
Between Bench and Bedside: Building Clinical Consensus at the NIH, 1977–2013
(/isis/citation/CBB649225500/)
Article
Peter Keating;
Alberto Cambrosio;
Nicole C. Nelson;
(2016)
“Triple negative breast cancer”: Translational research and the (re)assembling of diseases in post-genomic medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB354121073/)
Thesis
Jarrod Trainque;
(2021)
Where No Genome Has Gone Before: Star Trek and Genetic Medicine at the Advent of Gene Therapy
(/isis/citation/CBB965253304/)
Book
Charles Lawson;
Berris Charnley;
(2015)
Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Convergence in Laws
(/isis/citation/CBB742382287/)
Article
Sgaramella, Vittorio;
(2003)
Human Cloning: Mission Futile, Dangerous or Impossible?
(/isis/citation/CBB000600336/)
Article
Benedict Douglas;
(January 2018)
The mtDNA of Human Rights
(/isis/citation/CBB895767767/)
Article
Yoshiki Otsuka;
(2021)
Consumer Movements Confronted by Naturalness in Gene Editing in Japan
(/isis/citation/CBB161162030/)
Article
Shirley Sun;
Ann Hui Ching;
(2021)
Social Systems Matter: Precision Medicine, Public Health, and the Medical Model
(/isis/citation/CBB879164513/)
Be the first to comment!