Since the late 1980s, presentism has seen a resurgence among some historians of science. Most of them draw a line between a good form of presentism and typical anachronism, but where the line should be drawn remains an open question. The present article aims at resolving this problem. In the first part I define the four main distinct forms of presentism at work in the history of science and the different purposes they serve. Based on this typology, the second part reconsiders what counts as anachronism, Whiggism and positivist history. This clarification is used as a basis to rethink the research program of historical epistemology in the third section. Throughout this article, I examine the conceptual core of historical epistemology more than its actual history, from Bachelard to Foucault or others. Its project should be defined – as Canguilhem suggested – as an attempt to account for both the contingency and the rationality of science. As such, historical epistemology is based on a complex fifth form of presentism, which I call critical presentism. The critical relation at stake not only works from the present to the past, because of the acknowledged rationality of science, but also from the past to the present because of the contingency and historicity of scientific knowledge.
...More
Book
Kindi, Vasso P.;
Arabatzis, Theodore;
(2012)
Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB001421709/)
Article
Henry, John;
(2008)
Ideology, Inevitability, and the Scientific Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000850416/)
Book
Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé;
(2017)
Um papel para a história: O problema da historicidade da ciência
(/isis/citation/CBB954208990/)
Article
McEvoy, John G.;
(2007)
Modernism, Postmodernism, and the Historiography of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000700594/)
Article
Jon Arrizabalaga;
(2015)
Does History Matter? Commentary on “Making the Case for History in Medical Education”
(/isis/citation/CBB098931425/)
Article
Robert Bud;
(2016)
Representing scale: What should be special about the heritage of mass science?
(/isis/citation/CBB100969947/)
Article
William H. Brock;
(2022)
The Long and Short of It: The Future Writing of History of Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB683831416/)
Article
Stephen J. Weininger;
(2022)
“The Poor Sister:” Coming to Grips with Recent and Contemporary Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB175973451/)
Article
Ana Barahona;
(2023)
Erasing borders: a new look at the historiography of science
(/isis/citation/CBB305194897/)
Article
Soraya de Chadarevian;
(2016)
The future historian: Reflections on the archives of contemporary sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB898245006/)
Article
Frederick Rowe Davis;
(2019)
Pesticides and the Perils of Synecdoche in the History of Science and Environmental History
(/isis/citation/CBB309063848/)
Article
Catriel Fierro;
(2018)
Pluralism and Heterogeneity as Criticism: Undergraduate History and Systems of Psychology Courses in Argentinian Psychology Education (1983–2017)
(/isis/citation/CBB629037399/)
Article
Cooter, Roger;
(2014)
Neural Veils and the Will to Historical Critique: Why Historians of Science Need to Take the Neuro-Turn Seriously
(/isis/citation/CBB001321210/)
Article
Roberts, Lissa;
(2013)
Agency and Industry: Charles C. Gillispie's “The Natural History of Industry,” Then and Now
(/isis/citation/CBB001320539/)
Article
Weldon, Stephen P.;
(2013)
Bibliography Is Social: Organizing Knowledge in the Isis Bibliography from Sarton to the Early Twenty-First Century
(/isis/citation/CBB001321215/)
Article
Drees, Willem B.;
(2013)
Rich Religion and Science: Asian Religions, Ian Barbour, and Much Else
(/isis/citation/CBB001201403/)
Article
Peter Barber;
(2020)
'Context is everything ... ': Ruminations on Developments in the History of Cartography since the 1970s and Their Consequences
(/isis/citation/CBB365180358/)
Article
Rhodri Leng;
Gil Viry;
Miguel García-Sancho;
James Lowe;
Mark Wong;
Niki Vermeulen;
(2022)
The Sequences and the Sequencers: What Can a Mixed-Methods Approach Reveal about the History of Genomics?
(/isis/citation/CBB457018901/)
Article
Vanpaemel, Geert;
(2013)
“Beginnen is de allereerste voorwaarde om iets te verwezenlijken”. Paul Bockstaele (1920--2009) en de academisering van de wetenschapsgeschiedenis in België
(/isis/citation/CBB001321109/)
Article
Frijhoff, Willem;
(2013)
Honderd jaar universiteitsgeschiedenis in Nederland
(/isis/citation/CBB001321086/)
Be the first to comment!