Article ID: CBB067688595

Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science (September 2017)

unapi

Scientific authorship has become a contested terrain in contemporary science. Based on a survey of authors across fields, we measure the likelihood of specialist authors (sometimes called “guest” authors): people who only made specialized contributions, such as data, materials, or funding; and “nonauthor collaborators” (sometimes referred to as “ghost” authors): those who did significant work on the project but do not appear as authors, across different research contexts, including field, size of the project team, commercial orientation, impact of publication, and organization of the collaboration. We find that guest and ghost authors are common, with about one-third of publications having at least one specialist author and over half having at least one nonauthor collaborator. We see significant cross-field variations in both overall rates and types of specialist authors and nonauthor collaborators. We find there are generally fewer specialist authors among highly cited papers and more graduate student nonauthor collaborators in single location projects. The results suggest authorship practices vary across fields, and by project characteristics, complicating the use of authorship lists as a basis for evaluation (especially when comparing across fields or types of projects). We discuss implications of these findings for interpreting author lists in the context of science policy.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB067688595/

Similar Citations

Article Vincent Larivière; Nadine Desrochers; Benoît Macaluso; Philippe Mongeon; Adèle Paul-Hus; Cassidy R. Sugimoto; (June 2016)
Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production

Article Damien P. Williams; (2024)
Scholars are Failing the GPT Review Process

Article Jillian L. Goldfarb; Douglas L. Kriner; (February 2017)
Building Public Support for Science Spending: Misinformation, Motivated Reasoning, and the Power of Corrections

Article Karen Peterman; Jane Robertson Evia; Emily Cloyd; John C. Besley; (December 2017)
Assessing Public Engagement Outcomes by the Use of an Outcome Expectations Scale for Scientists

Article Nathan Walter; Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach; Yu Xu; Garrett M. Broad; (October 2018)
Communication Ecologies: Analyzing Adoption of False Beliefs in an Information-Rich Environment

Article Achterberg, Peter; (2014)
Knowing Hydrogen and Loving It Too? Information Provision, Cultural Predispositions, and Support for Hydrogen Technology among the Dutch

Article Lee Ahern; Colleen Connolly-Ahern; Jennifer Hoewe; (April 2016)
Worldviews, Issue Knowledge, and the Pollution of a Local Science Information Environment

Book John Potts; Nigel Helyer; (2022)
Science Meets Art

Article Andrew G. Skuce; John Cook; Mark Richardson; Bärbel Winkler; Ken Rice; Sarah A. Green; Peter Jacobs; Dana Nuccitelli; (2016)
Does It Matter if the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Is 97% or 99.99%?

Article Michael A. Cacciatore; Amy B. Becker; Ashley A. Anderson; Sara K. Yeo; (2020)
Laughing With Science: The Influence of Audience Approval on Engagement

Article Katharine J. Head; Monica L. Kasting; Lynne A. Sturm; Jane A. Hartsock; Gregory D. Zimet; (2020)
A National Survey Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Intentions: Implications for Future Public Health Communication Efforts

Article Jeeyun Oh; Sabitha Sudarshan; Eunjoo Jin; Soya Nah; Na Yu; (2020)
How 360-Degree Video Influences Content Perceptions and Environmental Behavior: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Self-Efficacy

Article Yan Huang; Chun Yang; (2020)
A Metacognitive Approach to Reconsidering Risk Perceptions and Uncertainty: Understand Information Seeking During COVID-19

Article Matthew H. Goldberg; Abel Gustafson; Matthew T. Ballew; Seth A. Rosenthal; Anthony Leiserowitz; (2019)
A Social Identity Approach to Engaging Christians in the Issue of Climate Change

Article Patrick C. Meirick; (2022)
Television News, Political Comedy, Party, and Political Knowledge in Global Warming Belief: Evidence From a Large-Scale Panel Survey

Article Katherine Nielsen; M. J. Gathings; Karen Peterman; (April 2019)
New, Not Different: Data-Driven Perspectives on Science Festival Audiences

Book Nathaniel Tkacz; (2015)
Wikipedia and the politics of openness

Article Elena Serrano; (2022)
Patriotic Women: Chemistry and Gender in the Eighteenth-Century Spanish World

Article Deepak Basyal; Brigitte Stenhouse; (2023)
Tikaram and Chandrakala Dhananjaya: A collaborative couple in mathematics from Nepal

Article Monica Gaughan; Barry Bozeman; (August 2016)
Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics

Authors & Contributors
Karen Peterman
Achterberg, Peter
Ahern, Lee
Besley, John C.
Bozeman, Barry
Cacciatore, Michael A.
Journals
Science Communication
Social Studies of Science
Ambix: Journal of the Society for the History of Alchemy and Chemistry
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Endeavour: Review of the Progress of Science
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences
Publishers
CRC Press
University of Chicago Press
Concepts
Communication of scientific ideas
Surveys
Science and technology studies (STS)
Scientific collaboration
Public understanding of science
Authorship
People
Dhananjaya, Tikaram
Dhananjaya, Chandrakala
Time Periods
21st century
18th century
20th century
20th century, late
Places
United States
Spain
Netherlands
Nepal
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment