A late-eighteenth-century encounter between Dutch merchants and cameralist Saxon officials is used to argue two related points. First, the history of knowledge can help us rethink hierarchical power structures like the Saxon mining bureaucracy. Mine owners had a right to information and could not be forced to pay contributions, which meant that mining officials were solicitous in sharing knowledge, fretted about investors’ favor, and took their desire for revenue into consideration. These observations directly challenge the traditional absolutist image of the Saxon mining bureaucracy. Second, the history of knowledge can help explain how certain rationalities (that is, combinations of means, ends, and values) came into being. Saxon officials sought to situate short-term income and expense in a success story that spanned decades and centuries. Informed by the concept of Nachhalt (sustainability), Saxon officials saw profit even in mines that lost money. This kind of sustainability thinking is best explained via the archival practices of the mining bureaucracy: officials collected information from yield sheets and local lore in order to calculate long-term outputs, to speculate about untapped deposits, and to disburse as little profit as possible. When the Dutch eventually understood this rationality, they withdrew. Saxony’s early modern mining bureaucracy was dismantled by liberal reforms in 1850s, but its peculiar brand of sustainability, aiming to extract resources at almost all costs, likely survived the dawn of industrial capitalism as young engineers and administrators became versed in it at the Freiberg Mining Academy. This article is part of a special issue entitled “Histories of Bureaucratic Knowledge,” edited by Sebastian Felten and Christine von Oertzen.
...MoreArticle Sebastian Felten; Christine von Oertzen (2020) Bureaucracy as Knowledge. Journal for the History of Knowledge.
Article
Sebastian Felten;
(2018)
The History of Science and the History of Bureaucratic Knowledge: Saxon Mining, Circa 1770
(/isis/citation/CBB103245872/)
Article
Harun Küçük;
(2020)
The Bureaucratic Sense of the Forthcoming in Seventeenth-Century Istanbul
(/isis/citation/CBB024194457/)
Article
Susanne Friedrich;
(2020)
Caveat from the Archive: Pieter van Dam’s Beschryvinge van de Oostindische Compagnie and Crisis Management
(/isis/citation/CBB746223772/)
Article
Sven Dupré;
Geert Somsen;
(2019)
The History of Knowledge and the Future of Knowledge Societies
(/isis/citation/CBB931053546/)
Article
Parak, Gisela;
(2018)
"Industrielandschaft" und "Bergbaulandschaft" in der Fotografie der 1920er und 1930er Jahre ("Industrial Landscape" and "Mining Landscape" in Photography of the 1920s and 1930s)
(/isis/citation/CBB328299185/)
Book
Andreas Weber;
Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis;
Huib J. Zuidervaart;
(2019)
Locations of Knowledge in Dutch Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB082873915/)
Article
Manfred Mücke;
(2020)
Die "Studien auf dem Gebiete des Bergrechtes" des Königlich Sächsischen Oberbergrates Georg Ernst Ohm und seine Kritik am sächsischen Gesetz über den Regalbergbau vom 22. Mai 1851 ("Studies in the Field of Mining Law" by Royal Saxon Oberbergrat Georg Ernst Ohm and his critical review of the Saxon law on Bergregal mining rights dated 22 May 1851)
(/isis/citation/CBB656172282/)
Article
Burghardt, Ivonne;
(2018)
Der sächsisch-meißnische Silberbergbau im Spätmittelalter (1350-1470). (Saxon-Meissenian silver mining in the late Middle Ages (1350-1470).)
(/isis/citation/CBB199524208/)
Article
Dietrich Stoyan;
Thomas Morel;
(2018)
Julius Weisbach's Pioneering Contribution to Orthogonal Linear Regression (1840)
(/isis/citation/CBB674937398/)
Article
Sebastian Felten;
(2020)
Mining culture, labour, and the state in early modern Saxony
(/isis/citation/CBB677637200/)
Article
Anna Echterhölter;
(2020)
Shells and Order: Questionnaires on Indigenous Law in German New Guinea
(/isis/citation/CBB475810663/)
Article
Sixiang Wang;
(2020)
Chosŏn’s Office of Interpreters: The Apt Response and the Knowledge Culture of Diplomacy
(/isis/citation/CBB358338782/)
Article
Maura Dykstra;
(2020)
A Crisis of Competence: Information, Corruption, and Knowledge about the Decline of the Qing State
(/isis/citation/CBB700688244/)
Article
Theodore Porter;
(2020)
Revenge of the Humdrum: Bureaucracy as Profession and as a Site of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB941930472/)
Article
John Sabapathy;
(2020)
Making Public Knowledge—Making Knowledge Public: The Territorial, Reparative, Heretical, and Canonization Inquiries of Gui Foucois (ca. 1200–1268)
(/isis/citation/CBB622320506/)
Book
John Krige;
(2019)
How Knowledge Moves: Writing the Transnational History of Science and Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB105773946/)
Article
Charly Coleman;
(2019)
The Spirit of SpeculationJohn Law and Economic Theology in the Age of Lights
(/isis/citation/CBB579032126/)
Article
John L. Heilbron;
(2019)
History of Science or History of Learning
(/isis/citation/CBB138652234/)
Article
Richard Staley;
(2019)
Partisans and the Use of Knowledge versus Science
(/isis/citation/CBB996112604/)
Chapter
Guido Poliwoda;
(2011)
Times of Flood, Times of Favour: Disaster Management and the Social Response to Catastrophic Floods: The Example of Saxony (1784-1845)
(/isis/citation/CBB260933559/)
Be the first to comment!