There is an ongoing methodological debate in philosophy of science concerning the use of case studies as evidence for and/or against theories about science. In this paper, I aim to make a contribution to this debate by taking an empirical approach. I present the results of a systematic survey of the PhilSci-Archive, which suggest that a sizeable proportion of papers in philosophy of science contain appeals to case studies, as indicated by the occurrence of the indicator words "case study" and/or "case studies." These results are confirmed by data mined from the JSTOR database on research articles published in leading journals in the field: Philosophy of Science, the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (BJPS), and the Journal for General Philosophy of Science (JGPS), as well as the Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (PSA). The data also show upward trends in appeals to case studies in articles published in Philosophy of Science, the BJPS, and the JGPS. The empirical work I have done for this paper provides philosophers of science who are wary of the use of case studies as evidence for and/or against theories about science with a way to do philosophy of science that is informed by data rather than case studies.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Daniel Steel;
Chad Gonnerman;
Michael O'Rourke;
(2017)
Scientists’ Attitudes on Science and Values: Case Studies and Survey Methods in Philosophy of Science
Article
Krist Vaesen;
Joel Katzav;
(2019)
The National Science Foundation and philosophy of science's withdrawal from social concerns
Article
James Miller;
(December 2018)
Media and mobility: Two fields, one subject
Article
Matthews, Michael R.;
(2001)
Methodology and Politics in Science: The Fate of Huygens' 1673 Proposal of the Seconds Pendulum as an International Standard of Length and Some Educational Suggestions
Essay Review
Marsha L. Richmond;
(2016)
STS Meets Environmental History
Article
Brandon Boesch;
(2018)
Representing in the Student Laboratory
Article
Eric Giannella;
(May 2016)
Expert Judgment versus Market Accounting in an Industrial Research Lab
Article
Guy Longworth;
(2018)
The Ordinary and the Experimental: Cook Wilson and Austin on Method in Philosophy
Book
John Forrester;
(2016)
Thinking in Cases
Article
Karl Heuer;
Deniz Sarikaya;
(2023)
Paving the cowpath in research within pure mathematics: A medium level model based on text driven variations.
Article
Marc J. Ratcliff;
(2017)
De la règle de l’exception au principe de Bonnet: les principes épistémologiques des sciences de la vie à partir de 1740
Article
Shaul Bar-Haim;
(2020)
Proving Nothing and Illustrating Much: The Case of Michael Balint
Book
Eric Scerri;
(2016)
A Tale of Seven Scientists and a New Philosophy of Science
Book
Tilman Sauer;
Raphael Scholl;
(2016)
The Philosophy of Historical Case Studies
Article
Nokuthula Hlabangane;
(2018)
Can a Methodology Subvert the Logics of its Principal? Decolonial Meditations
Book
Christie, Maureen;
(2001)
The Ozone Layer: A Philosophy of Science Perspective
Book
Kevin C. Elliott;
Ted Richards;
(2017)
Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science
Article
Christopher Pincock;
(2022)
Concrete Scale Models, Essential Idealization, and Causal Explanation
Article
Mary S. Morgan;
(2020)
‘If p? Then What?’ Thinking within, with, and from cases
Article
Ladyman, James;
(2011)
Structural Realism versus Standard Scientific Realism: The Case of Phlogiston and Dephlogisticated Air
Be the first to comment!