Anna Melnyk (Author)
Changing values may give rise to intergenerational conflicts, like in the ongoing climate change and energy transition debate. This essay focuses on the interpretative question of how this value change can best be understood. To elucidate the interpretation of value change, two philosophical perspectives on value are introduced: Berlin’s value pluralism and Dworkin’s interpretivism. While both authors do not explicitly discuss value change, I argue that their perspectives can be used for interpreting value change in the case of climate change and the energy transition. I claim that Berlin’s pluralistic account of value would understand the value change as an intergenerational conflict and therefore provide a too narrow and static ground for understanding ongoing value change. Instead, by exploring Dworkin’s standpoint in moral epistemology, this essay distills a more encompassing perspective on how values may relate, converge, overlap, and change, fulfilling their functions in the course of climate change and energy transition. This perspective is further detailed by taking inspiration from Shue’s work on the (re)interpretation of equity in the climate change debate. I argue that the resulting perspective allows us to see value change as a gradual process rather than as a clash between generations and their values.
...MoreArticle Ibo van de Poel; Behnam Taebi (May 2022) Value Change in Energy Systems. Science, Technology and Human Values (pp. 371-379).
Article
Ibo van de Poel;
Behnam Taebi;
(May 2022)
Value Change in Energy Systems
(/isis/citation/CBB234591523/)
Article
Irene A. Niet;
Romy Dekker;
Rinie van Est;
(May 2022)
Seeking Public Values of Digital Energy Platforms
(/isis/citation/CBB740629226/)
Article
David G. Havlick;
Christine Biermann;
(November 2021)
Wild, Native, or Pure: Trout as Genetic Bodies
(/isis/citation/CBB221988475/)
Article
Janet A. Kourany;
Manuela Fernández Pinto;
(September 2018)
A Role for Science in Public Policy? The Obstacles, Illustrated by the Case of Breast Cancer Screening Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB995252637/)
Article
Nadine Levin;
Sabina Leonelli;
(March 2017)
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research
(/isis/citation/CBB290502459/)
Article
Linda Martín Alcoff;
(2022)
Extractivist epistemologies
(/isis/citation/CBB746873206/)
Article
T. E. de Wildt;
I. R. van de Poel;
E. J. L. Chappin;
(May 2022)
Tracing Long-term Value Change in (Energy) Technologies: Opportunities of Probabilistic Topic Models Using Large Data Sets
(/isis/citation/CBB055589422/)
Article
Katherine W. Darling;
Angie M. Boyce;
Mildred K. Cho;
Pamela L. Sankar;
(January 2015)
'What Is the FDA Going to Think?' Negotiating Values through Reflective and Strategic Category Work in Microbiome Science
(/isis/citation/CBB106248451/)
Article
Ben Collier;
James Stewart;
(2022)
Privacy Worlds: Exploring Values and Design in the Development of the Tor Anonymity Network
(/isis/citation/CBB749753638/)
Article
Martin Fichman;
(2021)
Technoscientific control of nature: The ultimate paradox
(/isis/citation/CBB673435840/)
Article
Jessica Lehman;
(July 2021)
Sea Change: The World Ocean Circulation Experiment and the Productive Limits of Ocean Variability
(/isis/citation/CBB850580833/)
Article
Andreas Folkers;
Sven Opitz;
(June 2022)
Low-carbon cows: From microbial metabolism to the symbiotic planet
(/isis/citation/CBB874316885/)
Book
Matthias Heymann;
Gabriele Gramelsberger;
Martin Mahony;
(2017)
Cultures of prediction in atmospheric and climate science: Epistemic and cultural shifts in computer-based modelling and simulation
(/isis/citation/CBB844996573/)
Article
Myanna Lahsen;
(September 2016)
Toward a Sustainable Future Earth: Challenges for a Research Agenda
(/isis/citation/CBB813960256/)
Article
Kelvin Zhanda;
Munyaradzi A Dzvimbo;
Leonard Chitongo;
(December 2021)
Children Climate Change Activism and Protests in Africa: Reflections and Lessons From Greta Thunberg
(/isis/citation/CBB283151990/)
Article
Diego Silva;
(September 2021)
Keep Calm and Carry On: Climate-ready Crops and the Genetic Codification of Climate Myopia
(/isis/citation/CBB760093068/)
Article
James Powell;
(2017)
Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming
(/isis/citation/CBB664665682/)
Book
Dominique Pestre;
(2014)
Le gouvernement des technosciences: gouverner le progrès et ses dégâts depuis 1945
(/isis/citation/CBB753644520/)
Article
Rob Bellamy;
(March 2015)
A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering
(/isis/citation/CBB453591963/)
Article
Jo Guldi;
(2022)
The Climate Emergency Demands a New Kind of History: Pragmatic Approaches from Science and Technology Studies, Text Mining, and Affiliated Disciplines
(/isis/citation/CBB144261765/)
Be the first to comment!