How scientists become experts—or don’t: Social organization of research and engagement in scientific advice in a toxicology laboratory (2024)
Certain fields of research are deeply shaped by their proximity with policy-makers and administrations. The so-called ‘regulatory sciences’ and their corresponding expert communities emerge from this intermediary space between science and policy. Social studies of expertise and scientific experts show, however, that modes of engagement with policy-making vary greatly from one scientist to another. Two scientists that are part of the same research group or laboratory may engage the policy realm differently. How then does the social organization of research influence scientists’ participation in scientific advice and the production of regulatory sciences? The paper looks at toxicology, a field in which knowledge production is centrally motivated by risk assessment, but one that has also seen the emergence of different knowledge-making motives, including advancement of fundamental knowledge and frontier research. A toxicology laboratory may thus harbor a diversity of moral economies of scientific advice. The paper argues that scientists’ engagements with policy, through scientific advice and regulatory risk assessment, create organizational tensions and force changes to the standard, team-based social organization of research work.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Sebastian Ureta;
(January 2021)
Ruination Science: Producing Knowledge from a Toxic World
Article
Katharina T. Paul;
Samantha Vanderslott;
Matthias Gross;
(2022)
Institutionalised ignorance in policy and regulation
Article
Henri Boullier;
Emmanuel Henry;
(2022)
Toxic Ignorance: How Regulatory Procedures and Industrial Knowledge Jeopardise the Risk Assessment of Chemicals
Article
José Ramón Bertomeu Sánchez;
(2021)
Lead Poisoning in France around 1840: Managing Proofs and Uncertainties in Laboratories, Courtrooms, and Workplaces
Article
David Demortain;
(2024)
Mistrust of the black box: The public auditing of private models in the chemicals regulatory space
Article
Gail Davies;
(2021)
Locating the ‘culture wars’ in laboratory animal research: National constitutions and global competition
Article
Shobita Parthasarathy;
(2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser
Article
Robert Evans;
(February 2022)
SAGE advice and political decision-making: ‘Following the science’ in times of epistemic uncertainty
Article
Alina Geampana;
(2019)
Risky Technologies: Systemic Uncertainty in Contraceptive Risk Assessment and Management
Article
Gwen Ottinger;
(2022)
Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation
Article
Leonie Dendler;
Gaby-Fleur Böl;
(July 2021)
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
Article
Oliver Todt;
José Luis Luján;
(2022)
Rationality in Context: Regulatory Science and the Best Scientific Method
Article
Julie Guthman;
Sandy Brown;
(May 2016)
Whose Life Counts: Biopolitics and the “Bright Line” of Chloropicrin Mitigation in California’s Strawberry Industry
Article
Becky Mansfield;
(2021)
Deregulatory science: Chemical risk analysis in Trump’s EPA
Thesis
Alexis J. Abboud;
(2018)
A Biography of Endocrine Disruptors: The Narrative Surrounding the Appearance and Regulation of a New Category of Toxic Substances
Article
Laura Maxim;
(2025)
The Birth of Green Chemistry: A Political History
Article
Sheldon Krimsky;
(November 2015)
An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment
Article
Angus Law;
Graham Spinardi;
(2021)
Performing Expertise in Building Regulation: ‘Codespeak’ and Fire Safety Experts
Book
Rebecca Slayton;
(2023)
Arguments that Count: Physics, Computing, and Missile Defense, 1949-2012
Article
Colleen Lanier-Christensen;
(September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making
Be the first to comment!