Jakob Raffn (Author)
Frederik Lassen (Author)
Social Studies of Science
Volume: 51
Issue: 1
Pages: 139-164
Here we introduce the board game Politics of Nature, or PoN as it is now known. Inspired by the work of Bruno Latour, PoN offers an alternative take on co-existence by implementing a flat political ontology in a gamified meeting protocol. PoN does not suggest that humans have no special abilities, only that humans at the outset, are bestowed with no more rights than other kinds of beings. Designed to enable people of all walks of life to playfully unpack and resolve controversies, PoN provides a space where beings can have their existence renegotiated. The aim of PoN is to play as a team to explore and decide on potential good common worlds in which more indispensable beings can exist than if the status quo is continued. By playing PoN iteratively through rounds, each having four stages, the players gradually construct PoN - a planet mirroring ‘real worlds’. The four stages provide a novel combination of identification, representation, meditation, prioritization, mapping, individual and group ideation, proposal formulation, and decision-making; only to ask the players to challenge and change PoN to fit their requirements after each round. What follows is taken directly from the manual.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
María Belén Albornoz;
Javier Andrés Jiménez Becerra;
(2023)
How Do Technological Systems Define Who War Victims Are?
(/isis/citation/CBB249661358/)
Article
Latour, Bruno;
(April 2013)
Biography of an inquiry: On a book about modes of existence (Discussion)
(/isis/citation/CBB031241284/)
Article
Nina Frahm;
Tess Doezema;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission
(/isis/citation/CBB550648723/)
Article
Alexander Rushforth;
Thomas Franssen;
Sarah de Rijcke;
(2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups
(/isis/citation/CBB805796865/)
Article
Jenny Andersson;
Erik Westholm;
(2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders
(/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
(September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry
(/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)
Article
Brian Salter;
(January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)
Article
David Moats;
Liz McFall;
(2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools
(/isis/citation/CBB339833803/)
Article
Carmen McLeod;
Sarah Hartley;
(July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance
(/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)
Article
Natasha D. Schüll;
(March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)
Article
Emmanuel Henry;
Valentin Thomas;
Sara Angeli Aguiton;
Marc-Olivier Déplaude;
Nathalie Jas;
(September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)
Article
Jan-Peter Voß;
Jannik Schritt;
Volkan Sayman;
(February 2022)
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation
(/isis/citation/CBB229106240/)
Article
Tresch, John;
(April 2013)
Another turn after ANT: An interview with Bruno Latour (Discussion)
(/isis/citation/CBB883617949/)
Chapter
Michael Dillon;
Sarah Dillon;
(2020)
Artificial Intelligence and the Sovereign-Governance Game
(/isis/citation/CBB714156693/)
Article
Dick Kasperowski;
Niclas Hagen;
(June 2022)
Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance
(/isis/citation/CBB251191827/)
Article
Arapostathis, Stathis;
Léonard Laborie;
(January 2020)
Governing Technosciences in the Age of Grand Challenges: A European Historical Perspective on the Entanglement of Science, Technology, Diplomacy, and Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB096460466/)
Article
Yevgeniya Tomkiv;
Astrid Liland;
Deborah H. Oughton;
Brian Wynne;
(2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB106267662/)
Article
Tom Kane;
Nick Novelli;
(March 2019)
Technology for Governance, Politics, and Democracy [Special Issue Introduction]
(/isis/citation/CBB355109142/)
Article
Leandro de Brasi;
(March 2019)
Democratic Governance of Information Technologies: The Need for Citizen Competence
(/isis/citation/CBB632904072/)
Article
Victor Toom;
(July 2016)
Whose Body Is It? Technolegal Materialization of Victims’ Bodies and Remains after the World Trade Center Terrorist Attacks
(/isis/citation/CBB903588937/)
Be the first to comment!