Article ID: CBB033346411

Politics of Nature: The board game (2021)

unapi

Here we introduce the board game Politics of Nature, or PoN as it is now known. Inspired by the work of Bruno Latour, PoN offers an alternative take on co-existence by implementing a flat political ontology in a gamified meeting protocol. PoN does not suggest that humans have no special abilities, only that humans at the outset, are bestowed with no more rights than other kinds of beings. Designed to enable people of all walks of life to playfully unpack and resolve controversies, PoN provides a space where beings can have their existence renegotiated. The aim of PoN is to play as a team to explore and decide on potential good common worlds in which more indispensable beings can exist than if the status quo is continued. By playing PoN iteratively through rounds, each having four stages, the players gradually construct PoN - a planet mirroring ‘real worlds’. The four stages provide a novel combination of identification, representation, meditation, prioritization, mapping, individual and group ideation, proposal formulation, and decision-making; only to ask the players to challenge and change PoN to fit their requirements after each round. What follows is taken directly from the manual.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB033346411/

Similar Citations

Article María Belén Albornoz; Javier Andrés Jiménez Becerra; (2023)
How Do Technological Systems Define Who War Victims Are? (/isis/citation/CBB249661358/)

Article Latour, Bruno; (April 2013)
Biography of an inquiry: On a book about modes of existence (Discussion) (/isis/citation/CBB031241284/)

Article Nina Frahm; Tess Doezema; Sebastian Pfotenhauer; (January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission (/isis/citation/CBB550648723/)

Article Tresch, John; (April 2013)
Another turn after ANT: An interview with Bruno Latour (Discussion) (/isis/citation/CBB883617949/)

Article Carmen McLeod; Sarah Hartley; (July 2018)
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance (/isis/citation/CBB564349730/)

Article Alexander Rushforth; Thomas Franssen; Sarah de Rijcke; (2019)
Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups (/isis/citation/CBB805796865/)

Article Jenny Andersson; Erik Westholm; (2019)
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders (/isis/citation/CBB589179620/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; (September 2021)
Governing Occupational Exposure Using Thresholds: A Policy Biased Toward Industry (/isis/citation/CBB676852860/)

Article Brian Salter; (January 2022)
Markets, Cultures, and the Politics of Value: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology (/isis/citation/CBB380652953/)

Article Natasha D. Schüll; (March 2022)
Afterword: Shifting the Terms of the Debate (/isis/citation/CBB889022961/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas; (September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)

Article David Moats; Liz McFall; (2019)
In Search of a Problem: Mapping Controversies over NHS (England) Patient Data with Digital Tools (/isis/citation/CBB339833803/)

Chapter Michael Dillon; Sarah Dillon; (2020)
Artificial Intelligence and the Sovereign-Governance Game (/isis/citation/CBB714156693/)

Article Jan-Peter Voß; Jannik Schritt; Volkan Sayman; (February 2022)
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation (/isis/citation/CBB229106240/)

Article Dick Kasperowski; Niclas Hagen; (June 2022)
Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance (/isis/citation/CBB251191827/)

Article Leandro de Brasi; (March 2019)
Democratic Governance of Information Technologies: The Need for Citizen Competence (/isis/citation/CBB632904072/)

Article Tom Kane; Nick Novelli; (March 2019)
Technology for Governance, Politics, and Democracy [Special Issue Introduction] (/isis/citation/CBB355109142/)

Article Yevgeniya Tomkiv; Astrid Liland; Deborah H. Oughton; Brian Wynne; (2017)
Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy (/isis/citation/CBB106267662/)

Article Matthew Paskins; (2020)
History of science and its utopian reconstructions (/isis/citation/CBB599954521/)

Authors & Contributors
Henry, Emmanuel
Andersson, Jenny
Arapostathis, Stathis
Jas, Nathalie
Kasperowski, Dick
Laborie, Léonard
Journals
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Perspectives on Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Publishers
Oxford University Press
Concepts
Science and technology studies (STS)
Governance
Science and politics
Power (social sciences)
Democracy
Expertise
People
Latour, Bruno
Haraway, Donna Jeanne
Neurath, Otto
Popper, Karl Raimund
Stengers, Isabelle
Leckie, Ann
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
Places
Sweden
Europe
Institutions
European Commission
Google (firm)
Facebook (firm)
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment