Bird, Alexander (Editor)
Ladyman, James (Editor)
Arguing About Science is an outstanding, engaging introduction to the essential topics in philosophy of science, edited by two leading experts in the field. This exciting and innovative anthology contains a selection of classic and contemporary readings that examine a broad range of issues, from classic problems such as scientific reasoning; causation; and scientific realism, to more recent topics such as science and race; forensic science; and the scientific status of medicine. The editors bring together some of the most influential contributions of famous philosophers in the field, including John Stuart Mill and Karl Popper, as well as more recent extracts from philosophers and scientists such as Ian Hacking, Stephen Jay Gould, Bas van Fraassen, Nancy Cartwright, and John Worrall. The anthology is organised into nine clear sections: science, non science and pseudo-science race, gender and science scientific reasoning scientific explanation laws and causation science and medicine probability and forensic science risk, uncertainty and science policy scientific realism and anti-realism. The articles chosen are clear, interesting, and free from unnecessary jargon. The editors provide lucid introductions to each section in which they provide an overview of the debate, as well as suggestions for further reading.
...MoreReview Angelo Cei (2014) Review of "Arguing About Science". Science and Education (pp. 1223-1228).
Article
Thomas Milovac;
(2022)
Parachutes, randomized controlled trials, and all-cause mortality
Book
Saulo de Freitas Araujo;
Thiago Constâncio Ribeiro Pereira;
Thomas Sturm;
(2021)
The Force of an Idea: New Essays on Christian Wolff's Psychology
Article
Stephen Cooper;
(2017)
The Concepts of Ludwik Fleck and their Application to the Eukaryotic Cell Cycle
Article
Rey, Anne-Lise;
(2013)
The Status of Leibniz' Medical Experiments: A Provisional Empiricism?
Article
Cooper, Glen M.;
(2014)
Rational and Empirical Medicine in Ninth-Century Baghdad: Qustā Ibn Lūqā's Questions on the Critical Days in Acute Illnesses
Article
Volker Hess;
(2020)
Der Aphorismus als Wissenstechnik
Article
Stefano Canali;
(2019)
Evaluating Evidential Pluralism in Epidemiology: Mechanistic Evidence in Exposome Research
Article
David Teira;
(2019)
Placebo trials without mechanisms: How far can they go?
Book
Gabriella Zuccolin;
(2019)
I gemelli nel Medioevo. Questioni filosofiche, mediche e teologiche
Article
Saana Jukola;
(2017)
On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research – A comment on Stegenga
Article
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni;
(2013)
Of Snails and Horsetails: Anatomical Empiricism in the Early Modern Period
Article
Crignon, Claire;
(2013)
The Debate about methodus medendi during the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century in England: Modern Philosophical Readings of Classical Medical Empiricism in Bacon, Nedham, Willis and Boyle
Article
Alexander R. Fiorentino;
Olaf Dammann;
(2015)
Evidence, illness, and causation: An epidemiological perspective on the Russo–Williamson Thesis
Article
Donald Gillies;
(2017)
Evidence of mechanism in the evaluation of streptomycin and thalidomide
Article
Saana Jukola;
(2019)
On the evidentiary standards for nutrition advice
Book
Graham, Michael H.;
Parker, Joan;
Dayton, Paul Kuykendall;
(2011)
The Essential Naturalist: Timeless Readings in Natural History
Book
Poincaré, Henri;
(2002)
Scientific Opportunism (L'opportunisme scientifique): An Anthology
Book
Scharff, Robert C.;
Dusek, Val;
(2003)
Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition (An Anthology)
Book
McGrew, Timothy;
Alspector-Kelly, Marc;
Allhoff, Fritz;
(2009)
Philosophy of Science: An Historical Anthology
Book
Boersema, David;
(2009)
Philosophy of Science: Text with Readings
Be the first to comment!