Pedophilia Screening in Technosecurity Culture The Construction of Dangerous Sub-populations in the Name of Security (2020)
Pedophilia numbers among the prominent fears of western societies. Politicians have argued in favor of mass surveillance, claiming it is required to catch pedophiles, while a growing commercial market exists for ‘pedophilia screenings’. Sexology defines pedophilia as a sexual preference for prepubescent children, meaning that prior sex offenses are not essential for a diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria have changed little since pedophilia was first described as a psychiatric phenomenon, but there have been vast changes in the ways in which pedophilia is diagnosed. One aspect that has however remained the same is the persistent belief that pedophilia is an innate trait of an individual; this makes pedophilia discourses compatible with current risk discourses. Today's diagnostic tools include a range of technological procedures. This trend of deploying technologically enhanced diagnostics is indicative of a shift towards a technosecurity logic within the project of seeking physical evidence to demonstrate sexual desire. At the same time, this shift is co-constitutive of current risk discourses regarding child abuse. Technosecurity-based attempts to identify pedophiles may re-normalize the notion that ‘dangerous sub-populations’ exist that deserve only limited rights, thus paving the way for erosion of the legal system and of democratic principles.
...MoreArticle Jutta Weber; Katrin M. Kämpf (2020) Technosecurity Cultures: Introduction. Science as Culture (pp. 1-10).
Similar Citations
Article
Patrick Petit;
(2020)
‘Everywhere Surveillance’: Global Surveillance Regimes as Techno-Securitization
(/isis/citation/CBB181724884/)
Article
Darren Ellis;
(2020)
Techno-Securitisation of Everyday Life and Cultures of Surveillance-Apatheia
(/isis/citation/CBB734944273/)
Article
Rebecca J. Hester;
(2020)
Bioveillance: A Techno-security Infrastructure to Preempt the Dangers of Informationalised Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB548068287/)
Book
Brian Hochman;
(2022)
The Listeners: A History of Wiretapping in the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB775086796/)
Article
Evan Selinger;
Darrin Durant;
(2022)
Amazon’s Ring: Surveillance as a Slippery Slope Service
(/isis/citation/CBB181826170/)
Book
Ruha Benjamin;
(2019)
Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life
(/isis/citation/CBB021638267/)
Article
Michelle Spektor;
(2020)
Imagining the Biometric Future: Debates Over National Biometric Identification in Israel
(/isis/citation/CBB868369028/)
Book
Andrew J. Stewart;
(2021)
A Vulnerable System: The History of Information Security in the Computer Age
(/isis/citation/CBB486585682/)
Article
David Skinner;
(2020)
Race, Racism and Identification in the Era of Technosecurity
(/isis/citation/CBB130537802/)
Article
Jutta Weber;
Katrin M. Kämpf;
(2020)
Technosecurity Cultures: Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB780946835/)
Book
Kevin Howley;
(2018)
Drones: Media Discourse and the Public Imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB047987646/)
Article
Lucy Suchman;
Karolina Follis;
Jutta Weber;
(November 2017)
Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security: (Introduction)
(/isis/citation/CBB721841161/)
Book
Brian Jordan Jefferson;
(2020)
Digitize and Punish: racial criminalization in the digital age
(/isis/citation/CBB018434400/)
Article
Karolin S. Follis;
(November 2017)
Vision and Transterritory: The Borders of Europe
(/isis/citation/CBB478284294/)
Article
David Armstrong;
(February 2019)
The social life of data points: Antecedents of digital technologies
(/isis/citation/CBB757557196/)
Book
Mary F. E. Ebeling;
(2022)
Afterlives of Data: Life and Debt under Capitalist Surveillance
(/isis/citation/CBB663965321/)
Book
Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick;
(2020)
The good drone: How social movements democratize surveillance
(/isis/citation/CBB075748539/)
Book
Gilliom, John;
Monahan, Torin;
(2013)
SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001421286/)
Review
Russell, Andrew;
(2016)
Review of unknown publication
(/isis/citation/CBB100069195/)
Article
Ben Falchuk;
Shoshana Loeb;
Ralph Neff;
(June 2018)
The Social Metaverse: Battle for Privacy
(/isis/citation/CBB447859564/)
Be the first to comment!