Brock, William H. (Author)
Lewis, David E. (Author)
Between 1920 and 1922, the University of Bristol biochemist, Maximilian Nierenstein, published four papers in a series exploring the structure of catechin in the Journal of the Chemical Society. The Society then abruptly refused to accept any more of his papers on catechin, or any other subject. It provided him with no reasons for the embargo until 1925. It then transpired that Nierenstein was boycotted because it was deemed that he had not responded adequately to criticisms of his work made by his rival in catechin research, the German natural products chemist, Karl Freudenberg. It was not until 1929 that, as a result of a petition by a group of his former Bristol pupils and friends, that Nierenstein was again permitted to publish in the Society’s journal. The paper explores the Chemical Society’s treatment of Nierenstein in detail, sheds new light on his career and his reaction to the Society’s unprecedented boycott, examines some of the structural chemistry involved in the disputes, and discusses whether Nierenstein’s research deserves the label of ‘bad science’.
...More
Article
William H. Brock;
David E. Lewis;
(2023)
A Dark Comedy of Errors and Polemics: Nierenstein, Freudenberg and the Structure of Catechin
Article
Rayner-Canham, Marelene F.;
Rayner-Canham, Geoffrey W.;
(2003)
Pounding on the Doors: The Fight for Acceptance of British Women Chemists
Chapter
Fernando Egídio Reis;
(2021)
A periodização do conhecimento: comunicação e circulação do conhecimento em periódicos científicos do século XVIII
Book
Valérie Tesnière;
(2021)
Au bureau de la revue - Une histoire de la publication scien
Article
Mikkel Willum Johansen;
Josefine Lomholt Pallavicini;
(2022)
Entering the valley of formalism: trends and changes in mathematicians’ publication practice—1885 to 2015
Book
Christopher Lawrence;
(2013)
Rockefeller Money, the Laboratory and Medicine in Edinburgh 1919-1930: New Science in an Old Country
Article
Deichmann, Ute;
(2007)
“Molecular” versus “Colloidal”: Controversies in Biology and Biochemistry, 1900--1940
Article
Ute Deichmann;
(2021)
Template Theories, the Rule of Parsimony, and Disregard for Irreproducibility—The Example of Linus Pauling’s Research on Antibody Formation
Article
Roberts, Gerrylynn K.;
Simmons, Anna E.;
(2007)
The Overseas Dimensions of British Chemical Societies, c.1890--c.1950
Article
William H. Brock;
(2020)
The Curious Story of the Chemical Society’s Missing Obituary of John Lloyd Bullock
Article
Nanna Katrine Lüders Kaalund;
(2017)
A Frosty Disagreement: John Tyndall, James David Forbes, and the Early Formation of the X-Club
Book
Emanuel Bertrand;
Wolf Feuerhahn;
Valérie Tesnière;
(2023)
Éditer l’histoire des sciences (France, XXe siècle) : Entre sciences et sciences humaines
Article
Sveistyte, Alina;
Apsegaite, Violeta;
(2015)
The Publishing of Matthias Held's Physiologiae clavis (1653) in Kėdainiai, Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Article
Geir Hestmark;
(2017)
Tracings of the north of Europe: Robert Chambers in search of the Ice Age
Article
Ungar, Sheldon;
Bray, Dennis;
(2005)
Silencing Science: Partisanship and the Career of a Publication Disputing the Dangers of Secondhand Smoke
Chapter
Baldwin, Melinda;
(2014)
The Successors to the X Club? Late Victorian Naturalists and Nature, 1869--1900
Article
Weber, Marcel;
(2002)
Incommensurability and Theory Comparison in Experimental Biology
Article
Falk, Raphael;
Lazcano, Antonio;
(2012)
The Forgotten Dispute: A. I. Oparin and H. J. Muller on the Origin of Life
Article
García, Pío;
(2015)
Computer Simulations and Experiments: In Vivo-In Vitro Conditions in Biochemistry Source
Article
Jiuchen Zhang;
(2018)
How Modern Geology Was Published: A Case Study of Chinese Geological Journals, 1919 to 1949
Be the first to comment!