I identify and resolve an internal tension in Critical Contextual Empiricism (CCE) – the normative account of science developed by Helen Longino. CCE includes two seemingly conflicting principles: on one hand, the cognitive goals of epistemic communities should be open to critical discussion (the openness of goals to criticism principle, OGC); on the other hand, criticism must be aligned with the cognitive goals of that community to count as “relevant” and thus require a response (the goal-relativity of response-requiring criticism principle, GRC). The co-existence of OGC and GRC enables one to draw both approving and condemning judgments about a situation in which an epistemic community ignores criticism against its goals. This tension results from conflating two contexts of argumentation that require different regulative standards. In the first-level scientific discussion, GRC is a reasonable principle but OGC is not; in the meta-level discussion about science, the reverse holds. In meta-level discussion, the relevance of criticism can be established by appealing to goals of science that are more general than the goals of a specific epistemic community. To illustrate my revision of CCE, I discuss why feminist economists’ criticism of the narrowness of the goals pursued in mainstream economics is relevant criticism.
...More
Article
Tamar Schneider;
(2020)
Can We Talk About Feminist Epistemic Values Beyond Gender? Lessons from the Gut Microbiome
(/isis/citation/CBB112503055/)
Article
Silvia Manzo;
(2019)
Historiographical Approaches on Experience and Empiricism in the Early Nineteenth-Century: Degérando and Tennemann
(/isis/citation/CBB444177107/)
Article
Demopoulos, William;
(2003)
On the Rational Reconstruction of our Theoretical Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000410731/)
Article
Giglioni, Guido;
(2013)
Learning to Read Nature: Francis Bacon's Notion of Experiential Literacy (Experientia Literata)
(/isis/citation/CBB001321162/)
Article
Carus, A. W.;
(2010)
The Pragmatics of Scientific Knowledge: Howard Stein's Reshaping of Logical Empiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB001221444/)
Article
Lutz, Sebastian;
(2012)
On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View
(/isis/citation/CBB001232111/)
Book
Putnam, Hilary;
(2002)
The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays
(/isis/citation/CBB000410801/)
Chapter
Evelyn Fox Keller;
(2017)
Worrying about Essentialism: From Feminist Theory to Epistemological Cultures
(/isis/citation/CBB885118425/)
Article
Potochnik, Angela;
(2012)
Feminist Implications of Model-Based Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001221696/)
Article
Rayman, Joshua;
(2014)
Crossing the Epistemological Divide: Foucault, Barthes, and Neo-Kantianism
(/isis/citation/CBB001421725/)
Book
J. Sudarminta;
(2002)
Epistemologi dasar : pengantar filsafat pengetahuan [Basic Epistemology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge]
(/isis/citation/CBB807580872/)
Article
Grantham, Todd A.;
(2000)
Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology, and the Demic Structure of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000110861/)
Book
Groff, Ruth;
(2004)
Critical Realism, Post-Positivism, and the Possibility of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000401064/)
Book
Lehrich, Christopher I.;
(2007)
The Occult Mind: Magic in Theory and Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB000774186/)
Book
Zahar, Élie;
(2000)
Essai d'épistémologie réaliste
(/isis/citation/CBB000551184/)
Book
Biard, Joël;
(2012)
Science et nature: la théorie buridanienne du savoir
(/isis/citation/CBB001200401/)
Article
Chris Walker;
(2019)
Karl Jaspers and Karl Popper: the shared legacy
(/isis/citation/CBB353883243/)
Article
Ben-Chaim, Michael;
(2000)
Locke's ideology of “common sense”
(/isis/citation/CBB000111464/)
Book
Rescher, Nicholas;
(2003)
Epistemology: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000471051/)
Article
Andrea Amato;
(2018)
Knowledge within Anxiety
(/isis/citation/CBB342878764/)
Be the first to comment!