Thesis ID: CBB001567637

There's Power in the Blood: Religion, White Supremacy, and the Politics of Darwinism in America (2014)

unapi

Bolar, Richard Allen (Author)


Houston, Alan C
Houston, Alan C
Strong, Tracy B.
University of California, San Diego
Houston, Alan C
Goldman, Harvey S.
Strong, Tracy B.
Mackie, Gerry
Thorpe, Charles
Goldman, Harvey S.
Mackie, Gerry
Thorpe, Charles


Publication Date: 2014
Edition Details: Advisor: Houston, Alan C; Committee Members: Houston, Alan C., Goldman, Harvey S., Strong, Tracy B., Mackie, Gerry, Thorpe, Charles.
Physical Details: 386 pp.
Language: English

America's contentious relationship to Darwinism is often inadequately viewed as the product of religious reaction or educative failure. I argue that evolutionary biology has proven contentious in America because of the unique political context into which Darwin's ideas emerged. After the Civil War, evolution's content, and the predominately Northern scientists who supported it, became associated with the politics of radical Republicanism and racial egalitarianism. The Darwinian revision of the concept of racial variety made a polygenist conception of human origins untenable and discredited the structural inequalities implied by the rival "American School of Anthropology". Whereas before Darwin, natural history had formed an important part of the justification for slavery, after the publication of "The Origin of Species" in 1859, natural history became distasteful to the southern planters and slaveholders who had previously appealed to scientific authority. Because of the particular historical, social, and political context into which Darwinian evolution emerged in the United States, to believe or not to believe in evolution carried social and political connotations about ones fidelity to white supremacy, and called into question ones identity within the larger milieux of American political traditions and groups. Debates over evolution have been inextricably bound to a complex set of beliefs about race and political practices that have upheld white supremacy, sometimes called Southern nationalism, Southern civil religion, or ascriptive Americanism, which have operated to channel Southern understanding and treatment of evolution. The history of evolution in America teaches us how communities of identity use ideological beliefs to identify themselves as members of particular political and social groups, and how a constellation of mutually supporting ideas about the right to participate in the American polity and the nature of racial identity have shaped American reactions to science, religion, and society. Beliefs about racial identity and the constructed myths of Southern nationalism channeled white Southern reaction against evolutionary biology in ways that boosted the religious response to the scientific threat to white supremacy and increased the feeling that evolutionary biologists taught a dangerous, alien doctrine that was morally and socially subversive. The rejection of evolution by many Americans, especially in the South, has often been a way to signal and police social and political group boundaries. Because Darwinism had overthrown the scientific basis for polygeny, was supported by abolitionist New Englanders, and was charged with racially subversive undertones, while also challenging the conservative, Christian justifications for white supremacy, white Southerners reacted against evolution as a scientific doctrine, and in so doing they signaled support for the prevailing racial order and acted in solidarity to create the social and political ideology that sustained the Solid South.

...More

Description Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 76/03(E), Sep 2015. Proquest Document ID: 1624877469.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001567637/

Similar Citations

Book Lander, James; (2010)
Lincoln and Darwin: Shared Visions of Race, Science, and Religion (/isis/citation/CBB001023156/)

Book Numbers, Ronald L.; Stenhouse, John; (1999)
Disseminating Darwinism: The Role of Place, Race, Religion, and Gender (/isis/citation/CBB000110621/)

Book Cantor, G. N.; Swetlitz, Marc; (2006)
Jewish Tradition and the Challenge of Darwinism (/isis/citation/CBB000772602/)

Book Richards, Robert J.; (2013)
Was Hitler a Darwinian? Disputed Questions in the History of Evolutionary Theory (/isis/citation/CBB001213152/)

Chapter Paul, Diane B.; (2003)
Darwin, social Darwinism and eugenics (/isis/citation/CBB000359563/)

Book Turda, Marius; (2010)
Modernism and Eugenics (/isis/citation/CBB001033518/)

Article Duedahl, Poul; (2009)
Læst og påskrevet---Om racebegrebet hos Darwin (/isis/citation/CBB001022216/)

Book Washington, Sylvia Hood; (2005)
Packing Them In: An Archaeology of Environmental Racism in Chicago, 1865--1954. (/isis/citation/CBB000700470/)

Article Mattias Smångs; Kent Redding; (2019)
A Match Made in Heaven? Southern Evangelicalism and the Rise and Fall of Agrarian Populism in the 1890s (/isis/citation/CBB377362817/)

Article Phillips, Sarah T.; Potts, Dale; Petty, Adrienne; Schultz, Mark; Stalcup, Sam; Effland, Anne; (2013)
Reflections on One Hundred and Fifty Years of the United States Department of Agriculture (/isis/citation/CBB001320820/)

Article Xiaobo Yu; (2017)
Chinese paleontology and the reception of Darwinism in early twentieth century (/isis/citation/CBB864767954/)

Chapter Richards, Robert J.; (2009)
That Darwin and Haeckel Were Complicit in Nazi Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001032214/)

Book Thomas C. Leonard; (2016)
Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (/isis/citation/CBB839187981/)

Book Anderson, Warwick; (2003)
Cultivation of Whiteness: Science, Health, and Racial Destiny in Australia (/isis/citation/CBB000320229/)

Authors & Contributors
Richards, Robert John
Mooney, Katherine C.
Redding, Kent
Smångs, Mattias
Yu, Xiaobo
Simon, Kristi M.
Concepts
Science and race
Darwinism
Social Darwinism
Science and politics
Evolution
Science and religion
Time Periods
19th century
20th century
20th century, early
Progressive Era (1890s-1920s)
21st century
Places
United States
Southern states (U.S.)
Great Britain
Germany
Australia
Scotland
Institutions
United States. Department of Agriculture
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment