Thesis ID: CBB001567549

Making Sense of Smell: Classifications and Model Thinking in Olfaction Theory (cited 2013)

unapi

This thesis addresses key issues of scientific realism in the philosophy of biology and chemistry through investigation of an underexplored research domain: olfaction theory, or the science of smell. It also provides the first systematic overview of the development of olfactory practices and research into the molecular basis of odours across the 19th and 20th century. Historical and contemporary explanations and modelling techniques for understanding the material basis of odours are analysed with a specific focus on the entrenchment of technological process, research tradition and the definitions of materiality for understanding scientific advancement. The thesis seeks to make sense of the explanatory and problem solving strategies, different ways of reasoning and the construction of facts by drawing attention to the role and application of scientific representations in olfactory practices. Scientific representations such as models, classifications, maps, diagrams, lists etc. serve a variety of purposes that range from the stipulation of relevant properties and correlations of the research materials and the systematic formation of research questions, to the design of experiments that explore or test particular hypotheses. By examining a variety of modelling strategies in olfactory research, I elaborate on how I understand the relation between representations and the world and why this relation requires a pluralist perspective on scientific models, methods and practices. Through this work I will show how a plurality of representations does not pose a problem for realism about scientific entities and their theoretical contexts but, on the contrary, that this plurality serves as the most reliable grounding for a realistic interpretation of scientific representations of the world and the entities it contains. The thesis concludes that scientific judgement has to be understood through its disciplinary trajectory, and that scientific pluralism is a direct consequence of the historicity of scientific development. ]]>

...More

Description Defense date not indicated; cited by UMI in 2013. Cited in ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing. Proquest Document ID: 1557570755.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001567549/

Similar Citations

Article Diéguez, Antonio; (2013)
When do Models Provide Genuine Understanding, and Why Does It Matter? (/isis/citation/CBB001420762/)

Article Villani, Giovanni; (2014)
Structured System in Chemistry: Comparison with Mechanics and Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001420435/)

Book Annette Lykknes; Brigitte Van Tiggelen; (2019)
Women In Their Element: Selected Women's Contributions To The Periodic System (/isis/citation/CBB715950525/)

Article Jole Shackelford; (2020)
Chemical Paradigm vs. Biological Paradigm in the Biological Clock Controversy (/isis/citation/CBB257924238/)

Article Mary Jo Nye; Stephen J. Weininger; (2018)
Paper Tools from the 1780s to the 1960s: Nomenclature, Classification, and Representations (/isis/citation/CBB524633710/)

Article Eduard I. Kolchinsky; (2017)
Nikolaĭ I. Vavilov in the Realm of Historical and Scientific Discussions (/isis/citation/CBB711789477/)

Article Helge Kragh; (2019)
Controversial Elements: Priority Disputes and the Discovery of Chemical Elements (/isis/citation/CBB984827751/)

Article De Berg, Kevin; (2015)
Foundations of and Challenges to Electrolyte Chemistry (/isis/citation/CBB001551375/)

Chapter Andersen, Hanne; (2002)
The Development of Scientific Taxonomies (/isis/citation/CBB000202430/)

Book Hoppe, Brigitte; (2006)
Controversies and Disputes in the Life Sciences in the 19th and 20th Centuries (/isis/citation/CBB001035415/)

Article Daniel S. Brooks; Markus I. Eronen; (2018)
The significance of levels of organization for scientific research: A heuristic approach (/isis/citation/CBB081907453/)

Article Rayner-Canham, Marelene F.; Rayner-Canham, Geoffrey W.; (2003)
Pounding on the Doors: The Fight for Acceptance of British Women Chemists (/isis/citation/CBB000740526/)

Article Justin Price; (2020)
Model transfer and conceptual progress: tales from chemistry and biology (/isis/citation/CBB396720639/)

Book Harman, Oren; Dietrich, Michael R.; (2008)
Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology (/isis/citation/CBB000950264/)

Article Deichmann, Ute; (2009)
Chemistry and the Engineering of Life around 1900: Research and Reflections by Jacques Loeb (/isis/citation/CBB001230120/)

Book Hon, Giora; Schickore, Jutta; Steinle, Friedrich; (2009)
Going Amiss in Experimental Research (/isis/citation/CBB001020623/)

Article Wolfgang Steinicke; (2016)
William Herschel's 'Hole in the Sky' and the discovery of dark nebulae (/isis/citation/CBB568623091/)

Chapter Corsi, Pietro; (1987)
Julien Joseph Virey, le premier critique de Lamarck (/isis/citation/CBB000053535/)

Authors & Contributors
Price, Justin
Brooks, Daniel S.
De Berg, Kevin
Kolchinsky, Eduard I.
Weininger, Stephen J.
Villani, Giovanni
Concepts
Chemistry
Biology
Controversies and disputes
Models and modeling in science
Classification of knowledge
Periodic system of the elements; periodic table
Time Periods
19th century
20th century
18th century
21st century
Places
Great Britain
Institutions
Royal Society of Chemistry
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
Chemical Society, London
Cambridge University
Biochemical Society, London
American Chemical Society
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment