This thesis addresses key issues of scientific realism in the philosophy of biology and chemistry through investigation of an underexplored research domain: olfaction theory, or the science of smell. It also provides the first systematic overview of the development of olfactory practices and research into the molecular basis of odours across the 19th and 20th century. Historical and contemporary explanations and modelling techniques for understanding the material basis of odours are analysed with a specific focus on the entrenchment of technological process, research tradition and the definitions of materiality for understanding scientific advancement. The thesis seeks to make sense of the explanatory and problem solving strategies, different ways of reasoning and the construction of facts by drawing attention to the role and application of scientific representations in olfactory practices. Scientific representations such as models, classifications, maps, diagrams, lists etc. serve a variety of purposes that range from the stipulation of relevant properties and correlations of the research materials and the systematic formation of research questions, to the design of experiments that explore or test particular hypotheses. By examining a variety of modelling strategies in olfactory research, I elaborate on how I understand the relation between representations and the world and why this relation requires a pluralist perspective on scientific models, methods and practices. Through this work I will show how a plurality of representations does not pose a problem for realism about scientific entities and their theoretical contexts but, on the contrary, that this plurality serves as the most reliable grounding for a realistic interpretation of scientific representations of the world and the entities it contains. The thesis concludes that scientific judgement has to be understood through its disciplinary trajectory, and that scientific pluralism is a direct consequence of the historicity of scientific development. ]]>
...MoreDescription Defense date not indicated; cited by UMI in 2013. Cited in ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing. Proquest Document ID: 1557570755.
Article
Diéguez, Antonio;
(2013)
When do Models Provide Genuine Understanding, and Why Does It Matter?
(/isis/citation/CBB001420762/)
Article
Villani, Giovanni;
(2014)
Structured System in Chemistry: Comparison with Mechanics and Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001420435/)
Article
Jole Shackelford;
(2020)
Chemical Paradigm vs. Biological Paradigm in the Biological Clock Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB257924238/)
Article
Gisela Boeck;
(2020)
Das Periodensystem der Elemente – Eine Erfolgsstory von Anbeginn? Zur Rezeptionsgeschichte in den Jahren 1869–1910 (The Periodic Table of the Elements - A success story from from the beginning? On the history of its transmission in the years 1869-1910)
(/isis/citation/CBB249365317/)
Book
Annette Lykknes;
Brigitte Van Tiggelen;
(2019)
Women In Their Element: Selected Women's Contributions To The Periodic System
(/isis/citation/CBB715950525/)
Article
Mary Jo Nye;
Stephen J. Weininger;
(2018)
Paper Tools from the 1780s to the 1960s: Nomenclature, Classification, and Representations
(/isis/citation/CBB524633710/)
Book
Hoppe, Brigitte;
(2006)
Controversies and Disputes in the Life Sciences in the 19th and 20th Centuries
(/isis/citation/CBB001035415/)
Article
Daniel S. Brooks;
Markus I. Eronen;
(2018)
The significance of levels of organization for scientific research: A heuristic approach
(/isis/citation/CBB081907453/)
Article
Helge Kragh;
(2019)
Controversial Elements: Priority Disputes and the Discovery of Chemical Elements
(/isis/citation/CBB984827751/)
Article
De Berg, Kevin;
(2015)
Foundations of and Challenges to Electrolyte Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB001551375/)
Article
Eduard I. Kolchinsky;
(2017)
Nikolaĭ I. Vavilov in the Realm of Historical and Scientific Discussions
(/isis/citation/CBB711789477/)
Chapter
Andersen, Hanne;
(2002)
The Development of Scientific Taxonomies
(/isis/citation/CBB000202430/)
Article
Rayner-Canham, Marelene F.;
Rayner-Canham, Geoffrey W.;
(2003)
Pounding on the Doors: The Fight for Acceptance of British Women Chemists
(/isis/citation/CBB000740526/)
Book
Harman, Oren;
Dietrich, Michael R.;
(2008)
Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000950264/)
Article
Justin Price;
(2020)
Model transfer and conceptual progress: tales from chemistry and biology
(/isis/citation/CBB396720639/)
Article
Deichmann, Ute;
(2009)
Chemistry and the Engineering of Life around 1900: Research and Reflections by Jacques Loeb
(/isis/citation/CBB001230120/)
Book
Hon, Giora;
Schickore, Jutta;
Steinle, Friedrich;
(2009)
Going Amiss in Experimental Research
(/isis/citation/CBB001020623/)
Article
Wolfgang Steinicke;
(2016)
William Herschel's 'Hole in the Sky' and the discovery of dark nebulae
(/isis/citation/CBB568623091/)
Article
Hélène Gaget;
(2019)
Évolution de la formulation de l’analogie électrique-mécanique par les ingénieurs entre 1920 et 1960
(/isis/citation/CBB403117606/)
Article
Spek, Trienke M. van der;
(2006)
Selling a Theory: The Role of Molecular Models in J. H. van 't Hoff's Stereochemistry Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB000651710/)
Be the first to comment!