Green, Lisa Anne (Author)
In this historical dissertation, I examined the process of curriculum development in the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) in the United States during the period 1959-1963. The presentation of evolution in the high school texts was based on a more robust form of Darwinian evolution which developed during the 1930s and 1940s called "the modern synthesis of evolution." Building primarily on the work of historians Vassiliki Smocovitis and John L. Rudolph, I used the archival papers and published writings of the four architects of the modern synthesis and the four most influential leaders of the BSCS in regards to evolution to investigate how the modern synthetic theory of evolution shaped the BSCS curriculum. The central question was "Why was evolution so important to the BSCS to make it the central theme of the texts?" Important answers to this question had already been offered in the historiography, but it was still not clear why every citizen in the world needed to understand evolution. I found that the emphasis on natural selection in the modern synthesis shifted the focus away from humans as passive participants to the recognition that humans are active agents in their own cultural and biological evolution. This required re-education of the world citizenry, which was accomplished in part by the BSCS textbooks. I also found that BSCS leaders Grobman, Glass, and Muller had serious concerns regarding the effects of nuclear radiation on the human gene pool, and were actively involved in informing th public. Lastly, I found that concerns of 1950s reform eugenicists were addressed in the BSCS textbooks, without mentioning eugenics by name. I suggest that the leaders of the BSCS, especially Bentley Glass and Hermann J. Muller, thought that students needed to understand genetics and evolution to be able to make some of the tough choices they might be called on to make as the dominant species on earth and the next reproductive generation in the nuclear age. This was science for survival.
...MoreDescription Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 74/05(E), Nov 2013. Proquest Document ID: 1286749953.
Article
Alan Grafen;
(2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?
(/isis/citation/CBB453166142/)
Book
Brush, Stephen G.;
(2009)
Choosing Selection: The Revival of Natural Selection in Anglo-American Evolutionary Biology, 1930--1970
(/isis/citation/CBB001020903/)
Article
Yoichi Ishida;
(2017)
Sewall Wright, shifting balance theory, and the hardening of the modern synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB492038485/)
Chapter
Gissis, Snait B.;
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis
(/isis/citation/CBB001500089/)
Thesis
Kruse, Jerrid W.;
(2010)
Historical Short Stories in the Post-Secondary Biology Classroom: Investigation of Instructor and Student Use and Views
(/isis/citation/CBB001567201/)
Book
Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice;
Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira;
Stefano, Waldir;
(2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1
(/isis/citation/CBB000820181/)
Article
Garland E. Allen;
(2015)
How Many Times Can You Be Wrong and Still Be Right? T. H. Morgan, Evolution, Chromosomes and the Origins of Modern Genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB030960677/)
Book
Cain, Joe;
Ruse, Michael;
Burkhardt, Frederick;
(2009)
Descended from Darwin: Insights into the History of Evolutionary Studies, 1900--1970
(/isis/citation/CBB001020901/)
Book
Ruse, Michael;
Travis, Joseph;
(2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years
(/isis/citation/CBB001232307/)
Thesis
Shapiro, Adam R.;
(2007)
Losing the Word: The Scopes Trial, Biology Textbooks and the Evolution ofBiblical Literalism
(/isis/citation/CBB001560659/)
Book
Shapiro, Adam R.;
(2013)
Trying Biology: The Scopes Trial, Textbooks, and the Antievolution Movement in American Schools
(/isis/citation/CBB001213141/)
Article
Levit, Inga;
Hoßfeld, Uwe;
Olsson, Lennart;
(2009)
Creationism in the Russian Educational Landscape
(/isis/citation/CBB001421104/)
Article
Ben Bradley;
(2022)
Natural selection according to Darwin: Cause or effect?
(/isis/citation/CBB830954057/)
Chapter
Wilkins, Adam;
(2011)
Why Did the Modern Synthesis Give Short Shrift to “Soft Inheritance”?
(/isis/citation/CBB001500092/)
Article
Wolfe, Audra J.;
(2003)
Bentley Glass, Century's Son
(/isis/citation/CBB001251969/)
Thesis
Lewis, Anna;
(2008)
A Comparative Study of Six Decades of General Science Textbooks: Evaluating the Evolution of Science Content
(/isis/citation/CBB001560893/)
Article
Jonathan B. L. Bard;
(2017)
C.H. Waddington’s Differences with the Creators of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis: A Tale of Two Genes
(/isis/citation/CBB562199563/)
Article
Erik L. Peterson;
(2017)
‘So Far Like the Present Period’: A Reply to ‘C.H. Waddington’s Differences with the Creators of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis: A Tale of Two Genes’
(/isis/citation/CBB382932086/)
Article
Wolfe, Audra J.;
(2010)
What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered
(/isis/citation/CBB001022644/)
Article
Warren J. Ewens;
(2019)
Quantifying evolution by natural selection
(/isis/citation/CBB740058122/)
Be the first to comment!