Thesis ID: CBB001567264

A Reexamination of Early Debates on the Interpretation of Quantum Theory: Louis De Broglie to David Bohm (2011)

unapi

Perillan, Jose Gandarias (Author)


University of Rochester
Bigelow, Nicholas P.
Eberly, J. H
Bigelow, Nicholas P.
Outram, Dorinda
Schroder, Wolf-Udo
Brown, Theodore M.
Eberly, Joseph H.
Bigelow, Nicholas P.
Outram, Dorinda
Lavine, Richard
Schroder, Wolf-Udo
Brown, Theodore M.
Eberly, Joseph H.
Lavine, Richard


Publication Date: 2011
Edition Details: Advisor: Bigelow, Nicholas P., Eberly, J. H; Committee Members: Brown, Theodore M., Eberly, Joseph H., Bigelow, Nicholas P., Outram, Dorinda, Lavine, Richard, Schroder, Wolf-Udo.
Physical Details: 391 pp.
Language: English

The following dissertation reexamines the emergence and development of alternate formulations and interpretations of quantum theory from the 1920s to the early 1950s. Specifically, Louis de Broglie's alternate wave mechanical interpretation (1923 - 1927) and David Bohm's hidden variables program (1951 - 1952) are examined within their respective contexts of innovation. By presenting a more balanced and nuanced narrative of these 20 th century physicists, and their work, subtleties within the scientific exchanges between those engaged in early quantum interpretational debates begin to emerge which can serve to dispel some of the myths that have persisted in the overall historical quantum narrative. While de Broglie and Bohm were ultimately interested in restoring determinism to quantum theory, their particular influences, arguments, methodologies, approaches, and receptions were unique to their respective historical periods and each physicist's position within the physics community. Combining a close reading of the two distinct programs of scientific innovation with a representative analysis of the historical context in which they worked allows us to reexamine de Broglie and Bohm in a new light. The following analysis serves to restore these two physicists' agency in carving out their particular places within the physics community and dispels simplistic myths of marginalization. It also sheds light on de Broglie and Bohm's important contributions to the early quantum mechanical interpretation debates, thereby restoring their importance within the larger historical quantum narrative. Some of the topics that will be addressed include the following: who they trained with; where they trained; what their primary influences were; what their motivations were for proposing their particular alternate interpretations; what their particular research programs consisted of; how these evolved; and how each was received within the particular physics community. In order to successfully reconstruct these quantum histories, various methods of analysis have been used, including close readings of published and unpublished scientific papers, personal and professional correspondence, and a meta-data analysis of aggregate biographical data that reveals new insights into the academic networks within their wider socio-political environments.

...More

Description Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 73/02, Aug 2012. Proquest Document ID: 902517208.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001567264/

Similar Citations

Thesis Lee, Jeongmin; (2006)
Bohr vs. Bohm: Interpreting Quantum Theory through the Philosophical Tradition (/isis/citation/CBB001561463/)

Book Adam Becker; (2018)
What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics (/isis/citation/CBB773307813/)

Chapter Freire, Olival, Jr.; (2010)
Continuity and Change: Charting David Bohm's Evolving Ideas on Quantum Mechanics (/isis/citation/CBB001250590/)

Thesis Hanson, Todd Alan; (2007)
Quantum Entanglements: Collaboration and Communication in a ScientificCommunity of Practice (/isis/citation/CBB001560967/)

Article Jaeger, Gregg; (2000)
Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory (/isis/citation/CBB000110103/)

Article Mac Kinnon, Edward; (1976)
De Broglie's thesis: A critical retrospective (/isis/citation/CBB000011896/)

Article Seth, Suman; (2007)
Crisis and the Construction of Modern Theoretical Physics (/isis/citation/CBB000771300/)

Article Hanle, Paul A.; (1977)
Erwin Schrödinger's reaction to Louis de Broglie's thesis on the quantum theory (/isis/citation/CBB000016870/)

Article Navarro Veguillas, Luis; (1997)
Sobre una regla de cuantización de A. Einstein (1917) y su influencia en L. de Broglie (/isis/citation/CBB000077424/)

Article Marchildon, Louis; (2006)
Bohmian Trajectories and the Ether: Where Does the Analogy Fail? (/isis/citation/CBB000670173/)

Chapter Forstner, Christian; (2008)
Ein Außenseiter und Pseudowissenschaftler? David Bohms Quantenmechanik im Kalten Krieg (/isis/citation/CBB001023683/)

Article Albert, David Z.; (1994)
Bohm's alternative to quantum mechanics (/isis/citation/CBB000034437/)

Article Vigier, Jean-Pierre; (1982)
Louis de Broglie: Physicist and thinker (/isis/citation/CBB000028157/)

Article Bonk, Thomas; (1994)
Why has de Broglie's theory been rejected? (/isis/citation/CBB000050299/)

Authors & Contributors
Becker, Adam
Rocci, Alessio
Mac Kinnon, Edward
Vigier, Jean-Pierre
Seth, Suman
Pinch, Trevor J.
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Foundations of Physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Scientific American
Pensée: Recherches Marxistes, Sciences, Société, Philosophie
Llull: Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas
Publishers
Technique & Documentation--Lavoisier
Basic Books
Cambridge University Press
Indiana University
University of New Mexico
Concepts
Quantum mechanics
Physics
Theoretical physics
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
Sociology
Many worlds interpretation (quantum mechanics)
People
Broglie, Louis Victor Pierre Raymond de
Bohm, David Joseph
Einstein, Albert
Schrödinger, Erwin
Bohr, Niels Henrik David
De Donder, Théophile
Time Periods
20th century
20th century, early
21st century
20th century, late
Places
Copenhagen (Denmark)
Germany
Institutions
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment