IsisCB Explore

Thesis ID: CBB001567191

The Origins of Descartes' Concept of Mind in the “Regulae ad directionem ingenii” (2010)

Boston College
Solère, Jean-Luc
Marion, Jean-Luc
Buzon, Frédéric de
Garrett, Aaron
Marion, Jean-Luc
Fichant, Michel
Buzon, Frédéric de
Cobb-Stevens, Richard
Garrett, Aaron
Fichant, Michel

ISBN: 9781124115597

Publication Date: 2010
Edition Details: Advisor: Cobb-Stevens, Richard, Solere, Jean-Luc; Committee Members: Garrett, Aaron, Marion, Jean-Luc, Fichant, Michel, De Buzon, Frederic.
Physical Details: 577 pp.
Language: English

Outside Links

Academia.edu

Dualism Methodology of science; scientific method Philosophy of mind 16th century Early modern 17th century Descartes, René

This dissertation attempts to locate the origins of Descartes' concept of mind in his early, unfinished treatise on scientific method, the Regulae ad directionem ingenii . It claims that one can see, in this early work, Descartes' commitment to substance dualism for methodological reasons. In order to begin an analysis of the Regulae , one must first attempt to resolve textual disputes concerning its integrity and one must understand the text as a historical work, dialectically situated in the tradition of late sixteenth and early seventeenth century thought. The dissertation provides this historical backdrop and textual sensitivity throughout, but it focuses on three main themes. First, the concept of mathesis universalis is taken to be the organizing principle of the work. This methodological principle defines a workable technique for solving mathematical problems, a means for applying mathematics to natural philosophical explanations, and a claim concerning the nature of mathematical truth. In each case, the mathesis universalis is designed to fit the innate capacities of the mind and the objects studied by mathesis are set apart from the mind as purely mechanical and geometrically representable objects. Second, Descartes' account of perceptual cognition, the principles of which are found in the Regulae , is examined. In this account, Descartes describes perception as a mechanical process up to the moment of conscious awareness. This point of awareness and the corresponding actions of the mind are, he claims, independent from mechanical principles; they are incorporeal and cannot be explained reductively. Finally, when Descartes outlines the explanatory bases of his natural science, he identifies certain "simple natures." These are the undetermined categories according to which actual things can be known. Descartes makes an explicit distinction between material simples and intellectual simples. It is argued that this distinction suggests a difference in kind between the sciences of the material world and the science or pure knowledge of the intellectual world. Though the Regulae is focused on physical or material explanations, there is a clear commitment to distinguishing this type of explanation from the explanation of mental content and mental acts. Hence, the Regulae demonstrates Descartes' early, methodological commitment to substance dualism.

...More

Description Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 71/08, Feb 2011. Proquest Document ID: 737383734.

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001567191/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Bassiri, Nima; (2012)
Material Translations in the Cartesian Brain (/isis/citation/CBB001221608/)

Article Schickela, Joel A.; (2011)
Descartes on the Identity of Passion and Action (/isis/citation/CBB001211010/)

Book Shannon, Laurie; (2013)
The Accommodated Animal: Cosmopolity in Shakespearean Locales (/isis/citation/CBB001201666/)

Article Renee England; (2020)
Rethinking emotion as a natural kind: Correctives from Spinoza and hierarchical homology (/isis/citation/CBB074008360/)

Book Smith, Kurt; (2010)
Matter Matters: Metaphysics and Methodology in the Early Modern Period (/isis/citation/CBB001251421/)

Article Louis Rouquayrol; (2020)
Le problème du cercle de la méthode chez Ramus, Descartes et Spinoza (/isis/citation/CBB020139631/)

Article Craig Martin; (2015)
The Aeolipile as Experimental Model in Early Modern Natural Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB739878482/)

Thesis Sugar, Gabrielle; (2012)
The New Universe: Conceptions of the Cosmos in the Literary Imagination of Early Modern England (/isis/citation/CBB001567357/)

Article Janiak, Andrew; (2010)
Substance and Action in Descartes and Newton (/isis/citation/CBB001221446/)

Article Kirkebøen, Geir; (2001)
Descartes' Embodied Psychology: Descartes' or Damasio's Error? (/isis/citation/CBB000300809/)

Article Ash, Mitchell; (2007)
Die Sichtbarmachung des Unsichtbaren. Bemerkungen über Visualisierungsdiskurse und -strategien in der Geschichte der Psychologie (/isis/citation/CBB001023523/)

Book Paolo Pecere; (2023)
La natura della mente. Da Cartesio alle scienze cognitive (/isis/citation/CBB751480142/)

Book Landucci, Sergio; (2002)
La Mente in Cartesio (/isis/citation/CBB000301858/)

Book Alanen, Lilli; (2003)
Descartes's Concept of Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000640357/)

Article Landucci, Sergio; (2014)
L'obiezione di Hobbes e la risposta di Cartesio sulla mente (/isis/citation/CBB001510284/)

Chapter Wheeler, Michael; (2008)
God's Machines: Descartes on the Mechanization of Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000760388/)

Article Hatfield, Gary; (2007)
Did Descartes Have a Jamesian Theory of the Emotions? (/isis/citation/CBB001035167/)

Book Corneanu, Sorana; (2011)
Regimens of the Mind: Boyle, Locke, and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition (/isis/citation/CBB001250419/)

Book Bakker, Paul J. J. M.; Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.; (2007)
Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle's De anima (/isis/citation/CBB001020173/)

Article Fabrizio Baldassarri; (2020)
Descartes and the Dutch: Botanical Experimentation in the Early Modern Period (/isis/citation/CBB915974059/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}