Thesis ID: CBB001567191

The Origins of Descartes' Concept of Mind in the “Regulae ad directionem ingenii” (2010)

unapi

Smith, Nathan D. (Author)


Boston College
Solère, Jean-Luc
Marion, Jean-Luc
Buzon, Frédéric de
Garrett, Aaron
Marion, Jean-Luc
Fichant, Michel
Buzon, Frédéric de
Cobb-Stevens, Richard
Garrett, Aaron
Fichant, Michel


Publication Date: 2010
Edition Details: Advisor: Cobb-Stevens, Richard, Solere, Jean-Luc; Committee Members: Garrett, Aaron, Marion, Jean-Luc, Fichant, Michel, De Buzon, Frederic.
Physical Details: 577 pp.
Language: English

This dissertation attempts to locate the origins of Descartes' concept of mind in his early, unfinished treatise on scientific method, the Regulae ad directionem ingenii . It claims that one can see, in this early work, Descartes' commitment to substance dualism for methodological reasons. In order to begin an analysis of the Regulae , one must first attempt to resolve textual disputes concerning its integrity and one must understand the text as a historical work, dialectically situated in the tradition of late sixteenth and early seventeenth century thought. The dissertation provides this historical backdrop and textual sensitivity throughout, but it focuses on three main themes. First, the concept of mathesis universalis is taken to be the organizing principle of the work. This methodological principle defines a workable technique for solving mathematical problems, a means for applying mathematics to natural philosophical explanations, and a claim concerning the nature of mathematical truth. In each case, the mathesis universalis is designed to fit the innate capacities of the mind and the objects studied by mathesis are set apart from the mind as purely mechanical and geometrically representable objects. Second, Descartes' account of perceptual cognition, the principles of which are found in the Regulae , is examined. In this account, Descartes describes perception as a mechanical process up to the moment of conscious awareness. This point of awareness and the corresponding actions of the mind are, he claims, independent from mechanical principles; they are incorporeal and cannot be explained reductively. Finally, when Descartes outlines the explanatory bases of his natural science, he identifies certain "simple natures." These are the undetermined categories according to which actual things can be known. Descartes makes an explicit distinction between material simples and intellectual simples. It is argued that this distinction suggests a difference in kind between the sciences of the material world and the science or pure knowledge of the intellectual world. Though the Regulae is focused on physical or material explanations, there is a clear commitment to distinguishing this type of explanation from the explanation of mental content and mental acts. Hence, the Regulae demonstrates Descartes' early, methodological commitment to substance dualism.

...More

Description Cited in Dissertation Abstracts International-A 71/08, Feb 2011. Proquest Document ID: 737383734.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001567191/

Similar Citations

Article Schickela, Joel A.; (2011)
Descartes on the Identity of Passion and Action (/isis/citation/CBB001211010/)

Article Bassiri, Nima; (2012)
Material Translations in the Cartesian Brain (/isis/citation/CBB001221608/)

Article Renee England; (2020)
Rethinking emotion as a natural kind: Correctives from Spinoza and hierarchical homology (/isis/citation/CBB074008360/)

Book Shannon, Laurie; (2013)
The Accommodated Animal: Cosmopolity in Shakespearean Locales (/isis/citation/CBB001201666/)

Book Smith, Kurt; (2010)
Matter Matters: Metaphysics and Methodology in the Early Modern Period (/isis/citation/CBB001251421/)

Article Louis Rouquayrol; (2020)
Le problème du cercle de la méthode chez Ramus, Descartes et Spinoza (/isis/citation/CBB020139631/)

Article Janiak, Andrew; (2010)
Substance and Action in Descartes and Newton (/isis/citation/CBB001221446/)

Article Kirkebøen, Geir; (2001)
Descartes' Embodied Psychology: Descartes' or Damasio's Error? (/isis/citation/CBB000300809/)

Book Paolo Pecere; (2023)
La natura della mente. Da Cartesio alle scienze cognitive (/isis/citation/CBB751480142/)

Article Craig Martin; (2015)
The Aeolipile as Experimental Model in Early Modern Natural Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB739878482/)

Article Santucci, Antonio; (2000)
Francesco de Sarlo e le lettere filosofiche di un “superato” (/isis/citation/CBB000640753/)

Book Corneanu, Sorana; (2011)
Regimens of the Mind: Boyle, Locke, and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition (/isis/citation/CBB001250419/)

Article Fabrizio Baldassarri; (2020)
Descartes and the Dutch: Botanical Experimentation in the Early Modern Period (/isis/citation/CBB915974059/)

Book Altmann, Simon L.; (2002)
Is Nature Supernatural? A Philosophical Exploration of Science and Nature (/isis/citation/CBB000201765/)

Article Shapiro, Lisa; (2003)
Descartes' Passions of the Soul and the Union of Mind and Body (/isis/citation/CBB000670510/)

Book Seigel, Jerrold E.; (2005)
The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century (/isis/citation/CBB000930043/)

Article Hatfield, Gary; (2007)
Did Descartes Have a Jamesian Theory of the Emotions? (/isis/citation/CBB001035167/)

Authors & Contributors
Altmann, Simon L.
Ash, Mitchell G.
Bassiri, Nima
Corneanu, Sorana
Hatfield, Gary Carl
Janiak, Andrew
Journals
Perspectives on Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Bruniana & Campanelliana: Ricerche Filosofiche e Materiali Storico-testuali
Dianoia: Annali di storia della filosofia
Publishers
University of Chicago Press
Cambridge University Press
Carocci Editore
Oxford University Press
Prometheus Books
York University (Canada)
Concepts
Philosophy of mind
Dualism
Mind and body
Methodology of science; scientific method
Philosophy
Psychology
People
Descartes, René
Locke, John
Spinoza, Baruch
Kant, Immanuel
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von
Aristotle
Time Periods
17th century
Early modern
16th century
20th century
18th century
19th century
Places
France
Germany
England
Great Britain
Netherlands
Florence (Italy)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment