Bales, Ellen (Author)
In the 20th century's final decades, expert judgment in the form of quantitative risk assessment became the authoritative mode for understanding and expressing health and technological threats in the United States. By the mid-1980s, indeed, risk assessment had become one of the fundamental bases for public policy and federal regulation. Although the approach was new, controversial, and plagued by uncertainty, risk assessment was applied broadly as a means for giving justifiable, "scientific" answers to difficult political questions raised by modern science and technology. The professionalization of risk assessment in the 1970s and 1980s, which this dissertation places in historical context, was an important signpost for broader shifts in American approaches to risk during the last half of the 20th century. Along with the related fields of risk management and risk communication, formal risk assessment codified an increasingly authoritative expert epistemology based on distanced, statistical calculations. To illustrate these developments, this dissertation analyzes two case studies involving exposures to radon gas, an occupational and residential carcinogen and a hazard that the federal government attempted to manage both before and after the professionalization of risk assessment. These radon crises--the first in uranium mines in the Southwest in the 1950s and 1960s, and the second in suburban homes in the 1980s--are a lens through which the dissertation examines the ongoing tension between an expert epistemology that relied on quantification and a non-expert epistemology based on local knowledge, empirical evidence, and personal experience. These cases illustrate ongoing attempts to construct ideal citizens through risk communication and the media, and they reveal changes and continuities in the American public's perception of risk during the second half of the 20th century. This dissertation historicizes risk and the discourses around it, showing how regulatory agencies, the media, risk professionals, and private citizens employed narratives about risk to support their own epistemological systems, make claims to power or autonomy, and demarcate a shifting relationship between the government and its citizens.
...MoreDescription Cited in ProQuest Diss. & Thes. . ProQuest Doc. ID 304837096.
Article
Kapusta, Joseph I.;
(2008)
Accelerator Disaster Scenarios, the Unabomber, and Scientific Risks
(/isis/citation/CBB000932027/)
Book
Arwen Mohun;
(2013)
Risk: Negotiating Safety in American Society
(/isis/citation/CBB242291502/)
Article
Christopher Neumaier;
(December 2020)
Technological Solutions and Contested Interpretations of Scientific Results: Risk Assessment of Diesel Emissions in the United States and in West Germany, 1977–1995
(/isis/citation/CBB552521359/)
Article
Daniel Macfarlane;
(2019)
As nearly as may be: estimating ice and water on the Niagara and St. Lawrence Rivers
(/isis/citation/CBB009474339/)
Book
Jamie L. Pietruska;
(2017)
Looking Forward: Prediction and Uncertainty in Modern America
(/isis/citation/CBB992930313/)
Article
Steel, Daniel;
(2011)
Extrapolation, Uncertainty Factors, and the Precautionary Principle
(/isis/citation/CBB001024020/)
Article
Stefan Esselborn;
Karin Zachmann;
(2020)
Nuclear Safety by Numbers. Probabilistic Risk Analysis as an Evidence Practice for Technical Safety in the German Debate on Nuclear Energy
(/isis/citation/CBB607065323/)
Article
Cacciatore, Michael A.;
Scheufele, Dietram A.;
Corley, Elizabeth A.;
(2011)
From Enabling Technology to Applications: The Evolution of Risk Perceptions about Nanotechnology
(/isis/citation/CBB001034664/)
Article
Giroux, Élodie;
(2013)
The Framingham Study and the Constitution of a Restrictive Concept of Risk Factor
(/isis/citation/CBB001213410/)
Book
Ernst Homburg;
Elisabeth Vaupel;
(2019)
Hazardous Chemicals: Agents of Risk and Change, 1800-2000
(/isis/citation/CBB746037618/)
Article
Davide Orsini;
(2020)
Signs of Risk: Materiality, History, and Meaning in Cold War Controversies over Nuclear Contamination
(/isis/citation/CBB269303029/)
Article
Kuchinskaya, Olga;
(2011)
Articulating the Signs of Danger: Lay Experiences of Post-Chernobyl Radiation Risks and Effects
(/isis/citation/CBB001034665/)
Article
Dilshani Sarathchandra;
(2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience
(/isis/citation/CBB691241938/)
Article
Escobar, Maria Paula;
Demeritt, David;
(2014)
Flooding and the Framing of Risk in British Broadsheets, 1985--2010
(/isis/citation/CBB001420076/)
Article
Yasushi Sato;
(2017)
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) in Human Spaceflight: Technical, Cultural, Political, and Economic Factors Behind NASA's Stance to Risk
(/isis/citation/CBB015960150/)
Article
Mei-Fang Fan;
(2015)
Evaluating the 2008 Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan
(/isis/citation/CBB798880384/)
Article
Zwanenberg, Patrick van;
Millstone, Erik;
(2000)
Beyond skeptical relativism: Evaluating the social constructions of expert risk assessments
(/isis/citation/CBB000110633/)
Book
James P. Kraft;
(2021)
Havoc and Reform: Workplace Disasters in Modern America
(/isis/citation/CBB868261101/)
Book
Stern, Alexandra;
(2012)
Telling Genes: The Story of Genetic Counseling in America
(/isis/citation/CBB001213529/)
Book
Melanie Armstrong;
(2017)
Germ Wars: The Politics of Microbes and America's Landscape of Fear
(/isis/citation/CBB693385819/)
Be the first to comment!