Childerhose, Janet Elizabeth (Author)
Genetic discrimination has been transformed from an isolated concern of a handful of professionals into a pressing civil rights and public policy problem in the United States over the last twenty years. My dissertation is a genealogical account of how genetic discrimination has been shaped into a problem of this stature. It answers two questions: Where did the problem come from? How has the problem changed over time? In Part One, I trace the history of concerns about discrimination from the 1970s to the present. Drawing from oral histories with key actors and organizations that shaped early public understanding of the problem, I show that concerns about genetic discrimination originated in diverse practices. These practices include workplace genetic screening, insurer discrimination against individuals with AIDS, the rapid commercialization of genetic tests in the 1980s, and health care reform. In Part Two, I present findings from a three-year ethnographic study of public policy hearings on genomic medicine in the United States that illustrate how new actors have been defining the problem of genetic discrimination since 1995. The hearings of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health and Society were a site where participants legitimized genetic discrimination as a civil rights problem and developed lobbying tools to persuade Congress to pass federal nondiscrimination legislation. Participants framed fear of discrimination as a barrier to the nation's scientific progress and a significant threat to the lives of Americans. I use the construct of genomic citizenship to draw out claims about the rights and duties of Americans in contemporary discourse on genetic discrimination. Passing federal nondiscrimination legislation is one way in which the civil rights of Americans appear to be expanding, while their responsibilities to act genetically are increasing. Advocates of nondiscrimination legislation, who use the language of genetic defect to argue that everyone is vulnerable to discrimination, geneticize all Americans by enrolling them into the biosociality of the flawed, transparent genome, with attendant duties. What these advocates do not also champion is the right of Americans to refuse to think or act genetically.
...MoreDescription Cited in ProQuest Diss. & Thes. : doc. no. NR66431.
Article
Dove, William;
Susman, Millard;
(2012)
James F. Crow (1916--2012)
(/isis/citation/CBB001320466/)
Article
Whitney, Kristoffer;
(2014)
Domesticating Nature? Surveillance and Conservation of Migratory Shorebirds in the “Atlantic Flyway”
(/isis/citation/CBB001420087/)
Book
Fox, Daniel M.;
(2010)
The Convergence of Science and Governance: Research, Health Policy, and American States
(/isis/citation/CBB001031586/)
Article
Escobar, Maria Paula;
Demeritt, David;
(2014)
Flooding and the Framing of Risk in British Broadsheets, 1985--2010
(/isis/citation/CBB001420076/)
Book
Jonathan Engel;
(2018)
Unaffordable: American Healthcare from Johnson to Trump
(/isis/citation/CBB064961709/)
Article
Jennifer Dusdal;
Justin J. W. Powell;
David P. Baker;
Yuan Chih Fu;
Yahya Shamekhi;
Manfred Stock;
(2020)
University vs. Research Institute? The Dual Pillars of German Science Production, 1950–2010
(/isis/citation/CBB533528425/)
Article
Baldini, Nicola;
Fini, Riccardo;
Grimaldi, Rosa;
Sobrero, Maurizio;
(2014)
Organisational Change and the Institutionalisation of University Patenting Activity in Italy
(/isis/citation/CBB001420874/)
Article
Asayama, Shinichiro;
Ishii, Atsushi;
(2014)
Reconstruction of the Boundary between Climate Science and Politics: The IPCC in the Japanese Mass Media, 1988--2007
(/isis/citation/CBB001420057/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500176/)
Article
Yasushi Sato;
(2022)
Macro Historical Trends of the Structure of Science and Technology in the United States after World War II
(/isis/citation/CBB894444934/)
Book
Urban, Wayne J.;
(2010)
More Than Science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958
(/isis/citation/CBB001032662/)
Article
Chadarevian, Soraya de;
(2011)
The Making of an Entrepreneurial Science: Biotechnology in Britain, 1975--1995
(/isis/citation/CBB001220015/)
Article
Christoff, Peter;
(2013)
Climate Discourse Complexes, National Climate Regimes and Australian Climate Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001320850/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001500174/)
Article
Gupta, Joyeeta;
(2010)
A History of International Climate Change Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001221294/)
Article
Philipps, Axel;
(2011)
Errichtung und Zurechnung von Ressortforschungseinrichtungen. Eine Frage des Bedarfs an wissenschaftlicher Expertise?
(/isis/citation/CBB001220450/)
Thesis
Stephen C. Slota;
(2017)
Negotiating Science through Policy: EarthCube, Infrastructure and Policy-Relevant Science
(/isis/citation/CBB321485454/)
Book
Daynes, Byron W.;
Sussman, Glen;
(2010)
White House Politics and the Environment: Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush
(/isis/citation/CBB001034526/)
Thesis
VandeWall, Holly R.;
(2011)
Expertise and the Disunity of Science: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Providing Expert Advice for Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001562723/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500177/)
Be the first to comment!