LoLordo, Antonia (Author)
The 17{super}th{/super} century's new science and new philosophy was roughly equally divided between Cartesians and Gassendists. Scholars agree that understanding Gassendi's metaphysics, epistemology and scientific method is crucial for understanding the development of modern philosophy, as Gassendis version of Epicureanism provides a third strand of influence on modern philosophy paralleling Cartesianism and scholasticism. Despite this, Gassendi is rather little understood today. I look at Gassendi in the context of his {italic} Objections{/italic} and {italic}Counter- Objections{/italic} to the {italic} Meditations{/italic}, along with Descartes' {italic}Replies{/italic}. This context provides an explicit display of the opposition between two main strands of the new philosophy. I argue--{italic}contra{/italic} a popular characterization of Gassendi's thought as primarily skeptical or even wholly unsystematic--that Gassendi's objections derive from a systematic psychology and cannot be well understood without a grasp of this psychology. I begin with a central methodological question in the dispute, the status of clear and distinct perception and what this tells us about proper procedure. This disagreement has it source in competing accounts of the cognitive faculties. Hence I go on to develop an account of Gassendi's theory of the cognitive faculties, and in particular perception, the acquisition of ideas, and reasoning. I then examine Gassendi's initially rather puzzling objections to the {italic} cogito{/italic}, which act as a test-case for my interpretation of Gassendi's theory of cognition. I end with the dispute over the mind-body relationship. Gassendi objects that Descartes has failed to give any more than a nominal definition of the mind, having failed to make intelligible the modes of the mind in terms of its essence. Gassendi, in contrast, seeks an account of the operations of the mind in terms of the micro-level structure of the parts of the brain, and understands this micro-level structure as the genuine essence of the mind. This objection provides an excellent case for examining how Descartes and Gassendi's rival psychologies influenced two very different notions of scientific method.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 62 (2002): 3815. UMI order no. 3034271.
Article
LoLordo, Antonia;
(2005)
Gassendi on Human Knowledge of the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000670506/)
Article
Emanuela Scribano;
(2021)
I sociniani, Leibniz e Gassendi. Concorso divino e materia eterna
(/isis/citation/CBB624163581/)
Article
Antonio Clericuzio;
(2018)
Gassendi and the English Mechanical Philosophers
(/isis/citation/CBB990799390/)
Chapter
Hatch, Robert A.;
(2008)
Singes et Perroquets, Ô meilleur de la chair! Descartes & Gassendi représentant des points & parties
(/isis/citation/CBB001032128/)
Book
Landucci, Sergio;
(2002)
La Mente in Cartesio
(/isis/citation/CBB000301858/)
Chapter
Wheeler, Michael;
(2008)
God's Machines: Descartes on the Mechanization of Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000760388/)
Article
Hatfield, Gary;
(2007)
Did Descartes Have a Jamesian Theory of the Emotions?
(/isis/citation/CBB001035167/)
Article
Schickela, Joel A.;
(2011)
Descartes on the Identity of Passion and Action
(/isis/citation/CBB001211010/)
Book
Broughton, Janet;
Carriero, John Peter;
(2008)
A Companion to Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB001035168/)
Book
Bakker, Paul J. J. M.;
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.;
(2007)
Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle's De anima
(/isis/citation/CBB001020173/)
Article
Shapiro, Lisa;
(2003)
Descartes' Passions of the Soul and the Union of Mind and Body
(/isis/citation/CBB000670510/)
Article
Gillot, Pascale;
(2010)
La question de l'intériorité mentale à l'âge classique
(/isis/citation/CBB001252100/)
Article
Lolordo, Antonia;
(2005)
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation, and the Nature of the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000670339/)
Book
Seigel, Jerrold E.;
(2005)
The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB000930043/)
Article
Igor Agostini;
(2017)
Descartes and More on the Infinity of the World
(/isis/citation/CBB135510556/)
Chapter
Borghero, Carlo;
(2001)
Cartesius scepticus. Aspects de la querelle sur le scepticisme de Descartes dans la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB000102850/)
Article
Leonel Toledo Marín;
Samuel Herrera-Balboa;
Carmen Silva;
(2018)
La agenda naturalista de las pasiones en la filosofía de la modernidad temprana
(/isis/citation/CBB301730414/)
Article
Rodolfo Garau;
(2020)
Gassendi's Critique of Astrology
(/isis/citation/CBB174175518/)
Article
Robert Alan Hatch;
(2017)
Between Astrology and Copernicanism: Morin – Gassendi – Boulliau
(/isis/citation/CBB971117250/)
Book
Lagerlund, Henrik;
(2002)
Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB000301676/)
Be the first to comment!