Thesis ID: CBB001562431

Flesh vs. Mind: A Study of the Debate Between Descartes and Gassendi (2001)

unapi

LoLordo, Antonia (Author)


Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
Bolton, Martha


Publication Date: 2001
Edition Details: Advisor: Bolton, Martha
Physical Details: 257 pp.
Language: English

The 17{super}th{/super} century's new science and new philosophy was roughly equally divided between Cartesians and Gassendists. Scholars agree that understanding Gassendi's metaphysics, epistemology and scientific method is crucial for understanding the development of modern philosophy, as Gassendis version of Epicureanism provides a third strand of influence on modern philosophy paralleling Cartesianism and scholasticism. Despite this, Gassendi is rather little understood today. I look at Gassendi in the context of his {italic} Objections{/italic} and {italic}Counter- Objections{/italic} to the {italic} Meditations{/italic}, along with Descartes' {italic}Replies{/italic}. This context provides an explicit display of the opposition between two main strands of the new philosophy. I argue--{italic}contra{/italic} a popular characterization of Gassendi's thought as primarily skeptical or even wholly unsystematic--that Gassendi's objections derive from a systematic psychology and cannot be well understood without a grasp of this psychology. I begin with a central methodological question in the dispute, the status of clear and distinct perception and what this tells us about proper procedure. This disagreement has it source in competing accounts of the cognitive faculties. Hence I go on to develop an account of Gassendi's theory of the cognitive faculties, and in particular perception, the acquisition of ideas, and reasoning. I then examine Gassendi's initially rather puzzling objections to the {italic} cogito{/italic}, which act as a test-case for my interpretation of Gassendi's theory of cognition. I end with the dispute over the mind-body relationship. Gassendi objects that Descartes has failed to give any more than a nominal definition of the mind, having failed to make intelligible the modes of the mind in terms of its essence. Gassendi, in contrast, seeks an account of the operations of the mind in terms of the micro-level structure of the parts of the brain, and understands this micro-level structure as the genuine essence of the mind. This objection provides an excellent case for examining how Descartes and Gassendi's rival psychologies influenced two very different notions of scientific method.

...More

Description Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 62 (2002): 3815. UMI order no. 3034271.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001562431/

Similar Citations

Article LoLordo, Antonia; (2005)
Gassendi on Human Knowledge of the Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000670506/)

Article Emanuela Scribano; (2021)
I sociniani, Leibniz e Gassendi. Concorso divino e materia eterna (/isis/citation/CBB624163581/)

Article Antonio Clericuzio; (2018)
Gassendi and the English Mechanical Philosophers (/isis/citation/CBB990799390/)

Book Landucci, Sergio; (2002)
La Mente in Cartesio (/isis/citation/CBB000301858/)

Chapter Wheeler, Michael; (2008)
God's Machines: Descartes on the Mechanization of Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000760388/)

Article Hatfield, Gary; (2007)
Did Descartes Have a Jamesian Theory of the Emotions? (/isis/citation/CBB001035167/)

Article Schickela, Joel A.; (2011)
Descartes on the Identity of Passion and Action (/isis/citation/CBB001211010/)

Book Broughton, Janet; Carriero, John Peter; (2008)
A Companion to Descartes (/isis/citation/CBB001035168/)

Book Bakker, Paul J. J. M.; Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.; (2007)
Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle's De anima (/isis/citation/CBB001020173/)

Article Shapiro, Lisa; (2003)
Descartes' Passions of the Soul and the Union of Mind and Body (/isis/citation/CBB000670510/)

Article Gillot, Pascale; (2010)
La question de l'intériorité mentale à l'âge classique (/isis/citation/CBB001252100/)

Article Lolordo, Antonia; (2005)
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation, and the Nature of the Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000670339/)

Book Seigel, Jerrold E.; (2005)
The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century (/isis/citation/CBB000930043/)

Article Igor Agostini; (2017)
Descartes and More on the Infinity of the World (/isis/citation/CBB135510556/)

Article Leonel Toledo Marín; Samuel Herrera-Balboa; Carmen Silva; (2018)
La agenda naturalista de las pasiones en la filosofía de la modernidad temprana (/isis/citation/CBB301730414/)

Article Rodolfo Garau; (2020)
Gassendi's Critique of Astrology (/isis/citation/CBB174175518/)

Article Robert Alan Hatch; (2017)
Between Astrology and Copernicanism: Morin – Gassendi – Boulliau (/isis/citation/CBB971117250/)

Book Lagerlund, Henrik; (2002)
Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (/isis/citation/CBB000301676/)

Authors & Contributors
LoLordo, Antonia
Hatch, Robert Alan
Silva, Carmen
Garau, Rodolfo
Toledo Marín, Leonel
Herrera-Balboa, Samuel
Journals
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Revue de Synthèse
Philosophical Psychology
Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas
Journal of the History of Philosophy
Publishers
Kluwer Academic
Franco Angeli
Blackwell Publishers
Ashgate
Cambridge University Press
Concepts
Philosophy
Philosophy of mind
Psychology
Emotions; passions
Controversies and disputes
Natural philosophy
People
Descartes, René
Gassendi, Pierre
Morin, Jean Baptiste
Locke, John
Hobbes, Thomas
Thomas Aquinas, Saint
Time Periods
17th century
Renaissance
Early modern
Medieval
20th century
19th century
Places
France
England
Germany
Great Britain
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment