Thesis ID: CBB001562292

Four Central Issues in Popper's Theory of Science (2002)

unapi

Garcia-Duque, Carlos Emilio (Author)


University of Florida
Chuang, Liu


Publication Date: 2002
Edition Details: Advisor: Liu Chuang
Physical Details: 266 pp.
Language: English

Karl Popper's influential theory of science has been widely debated and vigorously criticized over the last few decades. The central concepts of Popper's theory, those of falsifiability, corroboration, and verisimilitude have been by-words in the literature of the Philosophy of Science during this period. Popper's challenges to orthodoxy and, in some ways, radical views, have generated considerable controversy. There have been sharp criticisms and a few defenders---but even among the defenders one sees mostly appropriations, rather than genuine defense. There has not, however, been any systematic general defense of his central views in the literature. This dissertation attempts such a defense, by way of a careful examination and sympathetic interpretation of the main themes of Popper's theory, namely, the role of falsifiability in responding to the demarcation problem and solving the problem of induction, the insistence on corroboration as a desirable feature of scientific theories as well as an indicator of empirical progress, and the theory of verisimilitude, according to which the long-term aim of science is properly pursued by means of advancing theories which constitute better approximations to the truth than their competitors. The overall strategy is to review carefully the most important criticisms of each of the above themes in Popper's theory. After providing background for a discussion of the matters at issue, I try to disarm the objections by showing that they misconstrue Popper's intent; to this end I provide alternative interpretations of how Popper can be properly understood and propose minor revisions to the concepts analyzed (being always respectful of Popper's original definitions). After dissolving the objections and developing the fundamental notions with the revisions introduced, Popper's theory of science emerges rehabilitated.

...More

Description Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2003): 933. UMI order no. 3083993.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001562292/

Similar Citations

Essay Review Steven William Clarke; (2016)
Popper and His Critics Revisited (/isis/citation/CBB453006071/)

Article Aronova, Elena; (2007)
Karl Popper and Lamarckism (/isis/citation/CBB001230134/)

Article Sober, Elliott R.; Mehmet Elgin; (2017)
Popper’s Shifting Appraisal of Evolutionary Theory (/isis/citation/CBB951176684/)

Book Hein van den Berg; (2013)
Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum (/isis/citation/CBB673387437/)

Chapter Bartels, Andreas; (2009)
Hypotheticity and Realism---Duhem, Popper and Scientific Realism (/isis/citation/CBB001032112/)

Book Nicola Berardi; (2014)
La rivoluzione copernicana di Popper: tematiche e questioni epistemologiche (/isis/citation/CBB384725954/)

Article Frederick, Danny; (2012)
Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science (/isis/citation/CBB001450888/)

Book Hark, Michael ter; (2004)
Popper, Otto Selz and the Rise of Evolutionary Epistemology (/isis/citation/CBB000550081/)

Article Díez, José A.; (2011)
On Popper's Strong Inductivism (or Strongly Inconsistent Anti-Inductivism) (/isis/citation/CBB001024145/)

Thesis Shah, Mehul; (2004)
Why Can't There Be a Logic of Discovery? (/isis/citation/CBB001561919/)

Article Shah, Mehul; (2008)
The Logics of Discovery in Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology (/isis/citation/CBB001230071/)

Article Davies, E. B.; (2003)
The Newtonian Myth (/isis/citation/CBB000340901/)

Chapter Uebel, Thomas E.; (2000)
Some Scientism, Some Historicism, Some Critics: Hayek's and Popper's Critiques Revisited (/isis/citation/CBB000470114/)

Article Kenaw, Setargew; (2010)
Psychoanalyzing Historicists? The Enigmatic Popper (/isis/citation/CBB001230057/)

Article Hansson, Sven Ove; (2006)
Falsificationism Falsified (/isis/citation/CBB000830365/)

Chapter Nye, Mary Jo; (2010)
Science and Politics in the Philosophy of Science: Popper, Kuhn, and Polanyi (/isis/citation/CBB001023240/)

Article Hayes, Peter; (2010)
Popper's Response to Dingle on Special Relativity and the Problem of the Observer (/isis/citation/CBB001024229/)

Authors & Contributors
Shah, Mehul
Kragh, Helge S.
Clarke, Steven William
Berardi, Nicola
Uebel, Thomas E.
Sober, Elliott R.
Concepts
Philosophy of science
Philosophers of science, modern
History of philosophy of science
Explanation; hypotheses; theories
Philosophy
Physics
Time Periods
20th century
20th century, early
21st century
20th century, late
18th century
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment