Jewett, Andrew John (Author)
Participants in contemporary public discourse routinely claim that early-twentieth-century American intellectuals, by adopting the practices, methods, and rhetorical style of science, abandoned their moral responsibility to society. I argue that today's scholars pay too much attention to individuals and institutions that sustain this narrative, ignoring those figures---particularly numerous in the interwar years---who believed that scientific thinking was a precondition for ethical social engagement. I demonstrate that between 1900 and 1950, prominent academic and public intellectuals invoked socially grounded, politically inflected definitions of science which built on an analogy between the production of scientific knowledge and the making of collective decisions in a republican polity. These scientific republicans, found throughout the disciplines and in the worlds of education, journalism, and government, believed that training the American population in the scientist's fabled independence of mind was the only way to maintain self-government in an industrially advanced nation. Mental independence was prerequisite to political independence, they thought, and the former was inextricably linked to science. By showing that the scientific republicans protested in vain against the institutions of science policy and technological innovation created during and after World War II by professionally oriented scientists, progressive industrialists, and stability-minded politicians and bureaucrats, I challenge the accounts of those scholars who indiscriminately blame all of the science enthusiasts of the early twentieth century for the military- industrial complex and the consumer-driven economy of the Cold War years. The scientific republicans of the interwar period envisaged something far different than the military-industrial state, but their hopes were never realized because American political discourse narrowed dramatically with the rise of domestic anticommunism. I maintain that contemporary critics of the university's social role would profit from a more sustained engagement with the vigorous but largely forgotten discourse on the social dimensions of knowledge which flourished in early- twentieth-century America.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2003): 624. UMI order no. 3082244.
Article
Jewett, Andrew;
(2003)
Science and the Promise of Democracy in America
(/isis/citation/CBB000410888/)
Book
Jasanoff, Sheila;
(2005)
Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB000641621/)
Book
Kitcher, Philip;
(2011)
Science in a Democratic Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001221195/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500176/)
Article
Evelyn Fox Keller;
(2017)
Climate science, truth, and democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB787498022/)
Article
McCormick, Sabrina;
(2007)
Democratizing Science Movements: A New Framework for Mobilization and Contestation
(/isis/citation/CBB000780240/)
Article
Briggle, Adam;
(2009)
The Kass Council and the Politicization of Ethics Advice
(/isis/citation/CBB000953543/)
Article
Miller, Clark A.;
(2004)
Interrogating the Civic Epistemology of American Democracy: Stability and Instability in the 2000 US Presidential Election
(/isis/citation/CBB000651370/)
Article
Abby Kinchy;
(2017)
Citizen Science and Democracy: Participatory Water Monitoring in the Marcellus Shale Fracking Boom
(/isis/citation/CBB233272324/)
Book
Andreas Birkbak;
Irina Papas;
(2022)
Democratic Situations
(/isis/citation/CBB680992726/)
Article
Florian Bruns;
Anne Oomeen-Halbach;
(2016)
,,Wir wollen mit den ersten Heften nicht gleich Sigerist und die Amerikaner verärgern! “ Das Wiedererscheinen von Sudhoffs Archiv: Hintergründe und Akteure 1945–1965
(/isis/citation/CBB050660791/)
Chapter
Nemerov, Alexander;
(2011)
A World Too Much: Democracy and Natural History in Godman and Audubon
(/isis/citation/CBB001210303/)
Book
Conway, Erik M.;
Oreskes, Naomi;
(2023-02-21)
The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market
(/isis/citation/CBB797392415/)
Chapter
Gerhard, Gesine;
(2012)
Change in the European Countryside: Peasants and Democracy in Germany 1935--55
(/isis/citation/CBB001201987/)
Article
Mottier, Véronique;
(2008)
Eugenics, Politics and the State: Social Democracy and the Swiss “Gardening State”
(/isis/citation/CBB000831707/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500175/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001500174/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500177/)
Book
Emmanuel Didier;
(2020)
America by the Numbers: Quantification, Democracy, and the Birth of National Statistics
(/isis/citation/CBB247797576/)
Article
Egge, Sara;
(2014)
“Strewn Knee Deep in Literature”: A Material Analysis of Print Propaganda and Woman Suffrage
(/isis/citation/CBB001421784/)
Be the first to comment!