Duncan-LaCoste, Lisbeth Ellen (Author)
University of Washington
Marks, Charles E.
Edition Details: Advisor: Marks, Charles E.
Physical Details: 243 pp.
Language: English
Descartes notoriously argued that non-human animals are unconscious automata, lacking both mentality and consciousness. Though Descartes's claim about animals has generally been viewed with scepticism, scientific opinion in the 20 th century tended to favor the Cartesian position with respect to animals, as exemplified by the long tenure of behaviorism. Today, despite the fact that behaviorism is no longer favored in science, Descartes's position is still far from dead. His views, and the controversy he started three hundred years ago, have been resurrected and given new life in a recent heated debate between biologists and ethologists. On one side of the debate are the neobehaviorists who argue that scientists should avoid describing or explaining animal behavior in terms of beliefs, desires, intentions, emotions, and conscious states. On the other side, the neoanthropomorphists claim there is no scientifically valid reason to assume that animals and humans are separated by some sort of unbridgeable gap when it comes to mental states and consciousness. Judging from this latest disagreement among scientists who study animals, it seems that we are no closer to resolving Descartes's controversy about animals in the 21st century than we were in the 17th century. Is it possible that Descartes was correct after all and animals really are not conscious? I argue in this thesis that there really are good reasons to believe that Descartes was wrong and that at least some animal species are conscious. But those reasons are not, for the most part, the ones usually cited by modern- day proponents of animal consciousness who rely on reasons based on behavioral evidence. Instead, we must adopt a completely different approach to the question of animal consciousness that draws support from neurobiology and neuroanatomy, the cognitive neurosciences, information processing theory, and adaptive evolutionary biology. I argue that with an interdisciplinary approach that draws on several sources of evidence, we can, in fact, provide scientifically valid reasons for claiming that at least some species of animal are most likely conscious.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2003): 525. UMI order no. 3079214.
Similar Citations
Article
Justin Prystash;
(2020)
Leaning from the Human: Virginia Woolf, Olaf Stapledon, and the Challenge of Behaviorism
(/isis/citation/CBB922911461/)
Article
Schönfeld, Martin;
(2006)
Animal Consciousness: Paradigm Change in the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB000720088/)
Article
Greenwood, John;
(2010)
Whistles, Bells, and Cogs in Machines: Thomas Huxley and Epiphenomenalism
(/isis/citation/CBB001250186/)
Book
Michael Tye;
(2016)
Tense Bees and Shell-Shocked Crabs: Are Animals Conscious?
(/isis/citation/CBB386080684/)
Article
Cohen, Sarah;
(2010)
Searching the Animal Psyche with Charles Le Brun
(/isis/citation/CBB001020871/)
Book
Philip Ball;
(2022)
The Book of Minds: How to Understand Ourselves and Other Beings, from Animals to AI to Aliens
(/isis/citation/CBB637451662/)
Article
Feder, Helena;
(2010)
Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB001023609/)
Article
Bradshaw, G. A.;
(2010)
An Ape Among Many: Animal Co-Authorship and Trans-species Epistemic Authority
(/isis/citation/CBB001023610/)
Article
Delphine Antoine-Mahut;
(2019)
Experimental Method and the Spiritualist Soul: The Case of Victor Cousin
(/isis/citation/CBB415731194/)
Book
Timothy M. Harrison;
(2020)
Coming To: Consciousness and Natality in Early Modern England
(/isis/citation/CBB273148572/)
Chapter
Senior, Matthew;
(1997)
“When the beasts spoke”: Animal speech and classical reason in Descartes and La Fontaine
(/isis/citation/CBB000072412/)
Thesis
Naragon, Steven S.;
(1987)
Reason and animals: Descartes, Kant, and Mead on the place of humans in nature
(/isis/citation/CBB001565184/)
Book
Gontier, Thierry;
(1998)
De l'homme à l'animal: Montaigne et Descartes ou les paradoxes de la philosophie moderne sur la nature des animaux
(/isis/citation/CBB000078231/)
Article
Rutherford, Alexandra;
(2006)
The Social Control of Behavior Control: Behavior Modification, Individual Rights, and Research Ethics in America, 1971--1979
(/isis/citation/CBB000671028/)
Article
Katja Guenther;
(2017)
Monkeys, Mirrors, and Me: Gordon Gallup and the Study of Self-Recognition
(/isis/citation/CBB045415018/)
Thesis
Feest, Uljana;
(2003)
Operationalism, Experimentation, and Concept Formation
(/isis/citation/CBB001561972/)
Article
Rémy Amouroux;
Nicolas Zaslawski;
(2020)
“The Damned Behaviorist” Versus French Phenomenologists: Pierre Naville and the French Indigenization of Watson’s Behaviorism
(/isis/citation/CBB319450623/)
Thesis
Panofsky, Aaron Leon;
(2006)
Fielding Controversy: The Genesis and Structure of Behavior Genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB001560772/)
Article
Cohen-Cole, Jamie;
(2005)
The Reflexivity of Cognitive Science: The Scientist as Model of Human Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB001031728/)
Book
Lemov, Rebecca;
(2005)
World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men
(/isis/citation/CBB000741953/)
Be the first to comment!