Staley, Thomas William (Author)
This work examines British inquiry into the human mind in the early nineteenth century using a multivalent structural analysis of ideas and practices within traditions established by Hume, Hartley, and Reid. While these traditions were propagated into the nineteenth century by such figures as Thomas Brown, James Mill, Sir William Hamilton, and Alexander Bain, this later period has received a dearth of attention in the history of psychology, the history of philosophy, and the history of ideas in general. This conspicuous lacuna forms the basis for two simple questions: What was the situated significance of work on the human mind in nineteenth century Britain? What was it supposed to accomplish, or be about? In particular, I focus on the differentiation of science from philosophy as a particular kind of non-science, investigating a set of existing formulations of the respective characters of the two. Using this historiographic survey as a springboard, I establish an analytical apparatus based upon four structural dimensions that I term conceptual, expository, iconic, and genealogical. Taken together, these four elements form an historical problematic, a set of persistent features and issues that structured work on mental subjects. With respect to conceptual structure, I propose a set of a dozen persistently central, but fluid, concept clusters involved in the study of mind. Regarding texts themselves, I situate my subject in terms of specific audience groups, patterns of expository development, and topical scope. I also examine the limiting influence of authorial and editorial practices on the appearance of the conceptual systems these texts convey. Iconic structural patterns focus even more closely on textual content, demonstrating shifts in the density, nature, and extent of citation within the intellectual community. These four dimensions interact significantly, reflecting the complex character of an active community of intellectual discussion. Having established this analytical space, I return to the basic terminological distinction between science and philosophy to investigate what was at stake in distinguishing these two fields in the nineteenth century. The dichotomy was far from definitive: British mental inquiry from the time of Hume's Treatise to that of Bain's first two major works never established a firm division of science from philosophy, but the evidence suggests several directions of tension along which this split would subsequently emerge. As demonstrated by evidence from the first volume of the journal, Mind , founded by Bain in 1876, discussions among students of the human mind in the nineteenth century established a position for mental philosophy itself as arbiter of the new science-philosophy dipole. In this light, the establishment of Mind can be viewed as the creation of a boundary-object that itself constituted this distinction in psychological terms.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 65/02 (2004): 671. UMI pub. no. 3122934.
Book
Seigel, Jerrold E.;
(2005)
The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB000930043/)
Article
Collins, Alan F.;
(2014)
Advice for Improving Memory: Exercising, Strengthening, and Cultivating Natural Memory, 1860--1910
(/isis/citation/CBB001214611/)
Book
Carmela Morabito;
(2020)
Il motore della mente. Il movimento nella storia delle scienze cognitive
(/isis/citation/CBB028669021/)
Book
Pietro Gori;
(2018)
Ernst Mach: tra scienza e filosofia
(/isis/citation/CBB991429309/)
Article
Wall, Byron Emerson;
(2007)
John Venn, James Ward, and the Chair of Mental Philosophy and Logic at the University of Cambridge
(/isis/citation/CBB000773911/)
Book
Green, Christopher D.;
Shore, Marlene Gay;
Teo, Thomas;
(2001)
Transformation of Psychology: Influences of 19th Century Philosophy, Technology, and Natural Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000102045/)
Chapter
Perletti, Greta;
(2010)
“As from a Dark and Troubled Sea”. The Light of Memory in Charlotte Brontë's Mature Fiction
(/isis/citation/CBB001024888/)
Chapter
Klein, Herbert;
(2007)
The Mechanical Age: Nineteenth-Century Materialism and the Human Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB001035840/)
Article
Matthew Stuart;
(2017)
Locke on Attention
(/isis/citation/CBB831262610/)
Book
Mills, Jon;
(2004)
Psychoanalysis at the Limit: Epistemology, Mind, and the Question of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000470140/)
Book
Lagerlund, Henrik;
(2002)
Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB000301676/)
Article
Dacome, Lucia;
(2004)
Noting the Mind: Commonplace Books and the Pursuit of the Self in Eighteenth-Century Britain
(/isis/citation/CBB000774486/)
Article
Gerson, Gal;
(2009)
Culture and Ideology in Ian Suttie's Theory of Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000931966/)
Thesis
Kroeker, Esther;
(2007)
Thomas Reid: Motives and the Anatomy of the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB001561316/)
Book
Knuuttila, Simo;
(2004)
Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB000471348/)
Article
Sarah Hutton;
(2017)
Salving the Phenomena of Mind: Energy, Hegemonikon, and Sympathy in Cudworth
(/isis/citation/CBB731645284/)
Thesis
Clark, David O.;
(2007)
Philosopher to Psychologist: The Early Career of Edwin Ray Guthrie, Jr.
(/isis/citation/CBB001561296/)
Article
Ceccarelli, Glauco;
(2015)
Declinazioni del rapporto psicologia-filosofia: Riflessi sull’insegnamento accademico nell’inchiesta di Enzo Bonaventura del 1914
(/isis/citation/CBB412380665/)
Book
Bakker, Paul J. J. M.;
Thijssen, Johannes M. M. H.;
(2007)
Mind, Cognition and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle's De anima
(/isis/citation/CBB001020173/)
Book
Wilson, Robert A.;
(2004)
Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB000470711/)
Be the first to comment!