Johnson, Jeffrey Allan (Author)
Human Genomics, the science of understanding the content of human genes, poses a variety of political challenges ranging from equality of access to the transformation of human identity. Democratic theory offers two resources for addressing these challenges in the form of two imperatives for democratic governance: a liberal imperative holds that technology as an object of public choice and a force structuring society ought to be subject to the consent of the governed, and a pragmatic imperative holds that for both political and epistemological reasons better public choices about technology are made through democratic procedures than through undemocratic ones. But there is a great obstacle to democratizing genomic technologies. The standard ethical concept used to understand technology is the neutrality thesis: technologies are value-neutral tools for the achievement of valued ends; thus ethical questions apply only to the uses of technologies and not to the technologies themselves. This thesis is embedded in genomic technologies, and limits them to the realm of technocratic rather than democratic governance. The neutrality thesis is enforced, I show, by the separation of nature and society inherent in the modern understanding of technology. As such, the modern understanding of technology is an obstacle to resolving the challenges of human genomics. The philosophical pragmatism of Charles Peirce proves to be the key to overcoming the tyranny of technological neutrality. Technology, rather than being an artifact, is an action. To understand it requires understanding not its physical nature but the subjective meaning of the action. Peirce's semiotics shows that reality is itself constructed by human understanding from the repertoire of possibilities inherent in the material reality, bridging the gap between modern conceptions of scientific knowledge and democratic social action. Dewey's politics of a community of deliberative democratic inquiry provides a link from this to at least two effective institutional models for this. Large-scale technological issues such as the provision of genetic therapy demand a state-centric model built around international regimes; less extensive issues such as research ethics allow a user-centered model where less formal epistemic communities develop their own paradigms for governance.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2004): 4191. UMI order no. 3113707.
Article
Birch, Kean;
(2006)
Introduction: Biofutures/Biopresents
(/isis/citation/CBB000720300/)
Article
Jasanoff, Sheila;
(2006)
Biotechnology and Empire: The Global Power of Seeds and Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000670755/)
Chapter
Kahn, Jonathan;
(2011)
Inventing Race as a Genetic Commodity in Biotechnology Patents
(/isis/citation/CBB001221562/)
Thesis
Sehat, Connie Moon;
(2006)
Education and Utopia: Technology Museums in Cold War Germany
(/isis/citation/CBB001561680/)
Book
Callon, Michel;
Lascoumes, Pierre;
Barthe, Yannick;
(2009)
Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB000951621/)
Article
Fullwiley, Duana;
(2008)
The Biologistical Construction of Race: “Admixture” Technology and the New Genetic Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB000953516/)
Article
Barns, Ian;
Schibeci, Renato;
Davison, Aidan;
Shaw, Robyn;
(2000)
“What do you think about genetic medicine?” Facilitating sociable public discourse on developments in the new genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB000110115/)
Thesis
Harris, Chad Vincent;
(2003)
Satellite Imagery and Discourses of Transparency
(/isis/citation/CBB001560559/)
Book
Sheila Jasanoff;
Sang-Hyun Kim;
(2015)
Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power
(/isis/citation/CBB690565115/)
Thesis
Poitras, Manuel;
(2003)
Engineering Genomes, Engineering Societies? Genetic Imperialism and the Politics of Biotechnology in Mexico
(/isis/citation/CBB001561955/)
Article
Marres, Noortje;
(2007)
The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB000773320/)
Book
Stephen P. Weldon;
(2020)
The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism
(/isis/citation/CBB416689602/)
Book
Jasanoff, Sheila;
(2005)
Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States
(/isis/citation/CBB000641621/)
Article
Levidow, Les;
(2007)
European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?
(/isis/citation/CBB000760584/)
Article
Sommer, Marianne;
(2014)
Biology as a Technology of Social Justice in Interwar Britain: Arguments from Evolutionary History, Heredity, and Human Diversity
(/isis/citation/CBB001421204/)
Book
Gee, Henry;
(2004)
Jacob's Ladder: The History of the Human Genome
(/isis/citation/CBB000520003/)
Chapter
Bijker, W. E.;
(1996)
Demokratisierung der technik -- Wer sind die experten?
(/isis/citation/CBB001181539/)
Article
Sorj, Bernardo;
(2008)
Internet, Public Sphere, and Political Marketing: Between the Promotion of Communication and Moralist Solipsism
(/isis/citation/CBB001031104/)
Article
Bijker, W. E.;
(1997)
Démocratisation de la culture technologique
(/isis/citation/CBB001181537/)
Article
Holt, Rush;
(Summer 2007)
Legal Issues, Policy Issues, and the Future of DemocracyRush Holt
(/isis/citation/CBB467677401/)
Be the first to comment!