Jolly, J. Christopher (Author)
The public controversy over possible health hazards from radioactive fallout from atomic bomb testing began in 1954, shortly after a thermonuclear test by the United States spread fallout world wide. In the dissertation, I address two of the fundamental questions of the fallout controversy: Was there a threshold of radiation exposure below which there would be no significant injury? What was the role of a responsible scientist in a public scientific debate? Genetics and medicine were the scientific fields most directly involved in the debate over the biological effects of radiation. Geneticists' prewar experiences with radiation led them to believe that there was no safe level of radiation exposure and that any amount of radiation would cause a proportional amount of genetic injury. In contrast to geneticists, physicians and medical researchers generally believed that there was a threshold for somatic injury from radiation. One theme of the dissertation is an examination of how different scientific conceptual and methodological approaches affected how geneticists and medical researchers evaluated the possible health effects of fallout. Geneticists and physicians differed not only in their evaluations of radiation hazards, but also in their views of how the debate over fallout should be conducted. A central question of the fallout debate was how a responsible scientist should act in a public policy controversy involving scientific issues upon which the scientific community had not yet reached a consensus. Based on their assumption that any increase in radiation exposure was harmful, most geneticists believed that they had a responsibility to speak out publicly about the deleterious effects of radiation. Physicians, who believed in the likelihood of a threshold for significant radiation-induced injury, generally adopted the opposite view. They believed that public discussion of possible, but improbable, radiation hazards was irresponsible because it risked creating irrational public fear of radiation exposure. In my dissertation, I examine how the different positions of geneticists and physicians over what constituted responsible public scientific debate affected the rhetoric of the controversy, as well as the implications of the debate in matters of politics and policy.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 64 (2004): 4600. UMI order no. 3115467.
Article
Kirsch, Scott;
(2004)
Harold Knapp and the Geography of Normal Controversy: Radioiodine in the Historical Environment
(/isis/citation/CBB000750326/)
Thesis
Angiel, Randal;
(2003)
Geography, Radioactive Contamination and Public Health: The Albany-Troy Rainout after 50 Years
(/isis/citation/CBB001562317/)
Thesis
Verhoff, Gwendolyn;
(2007)
The Intractable Atom: The Challenge of Radiation and Radioactive Waste inAmerican Life, 1942 to Present
(/isis/citation/CBB001561527/)
Thesis
Jessee, Emory Jerry;
(2013)
Radiation Ecologies: Bombs, Bodies, and Environment during the Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing Period, 1942--1965
(/isis/citation/CBB001560759/)
Book
Hamblin, Jacob Darwin;
(2008)
Poison in the Well: Radioactive Waste in the Oceans at the Dawn of the Nuclear Age
(/isis/citation/CBB000774692/)
Book
Robert A. Jacobs;
(2022)
Nuclear Bodies: The Global Hibakusha
(/isis/citation/CBB596228330/)
Book
Edelstein, Michael R.;
Makofske, William J.;
(1998)
Radon's Deadly Daughters: Science, Environmental Policy, and the Politics of Risk
(/isis/citation/CBB000320516/)
Thesis
Celso, Jr. Baldivieso;
(2016)
Irradiating Eden: The El Verde Experiment and the Atomic Energy Commission's nuclear prospecting in Latin America, 1954-1970
(/isis/citation/CBB898540521/)
Article
Andrea Candela;
(2017)
Sorting Out Nuclear Concerns: The Australian Uranium Debate From Jervis Bay to Ringwood's Synroc
(/isis/citation/CBB414955330/)
Article
McKinney, Gordon B.;
(2005)
The Fractured Land of the Sky: The Image of Western North Carolina during the 1986 Nuclear Waste Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB000660331/)
Article
Lisa Ruth Rand;
(January 2019)
Falling Cosmos: Nuclear Reentry and the Environmental History of Earth Orbit
(/isis/citation/CBB208189412/)
Article
Rothschild, Rachel;
(2013)
Environmental Awareness in the Atomic Age: Radioecologists and Nuclear Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB001213269/)
Article
Hiroshi Ichikawa;
(2015)
Radiation Studies and the Soviet Scientists in the Second Half of the 1950's
(/isis/citation/CBB611418704/)
Article
Petryna, Adriana;
(2004)
Biological Citizenship: The Science and Politics of Chernobyl-Exposed Populations
(/isis/citation/CBB000750331/)
Book
Larry C. Johns;
Alan R. Johns;
(2017)
The Baneberry Disaster: A Generation of Atomic Fallout
(/isis/citation/CBB760417809/)
Article
Boudia, Soraya;
(2007)
Global Regulation: Controlling and Accepting Radioactivity Risks
(/isis/citation/CBB000850042/)
Article
Sumiko Hatakeyama;
(2021)
Let Chromosomes Speak: The Cytogenetics Project at the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC)
(/isis/citation/CBB161117781/)
Book
Largent, Mark A.;
(2012)
Vaccine: The Debate in Modern America
(/isis/citation/CBB001213531/)
Article
Andrea Candela;
(2024)
‘The Nuclear Siting Controversy’ in 1970s Italy: Historical Perspectives on Geology, Nuclear Power and Radioactive Waste
(/isis/citation/CBB964498450/)
Book
Fox, Sarah Alisabeth;
(2014)
Downwind: A People's History of the Nuclear West
(/isis/citation/CBB001422378/)
Be the first to comment!