Knight, Lora Lea (Author)
During the first four decades of the twentieth-century, eugenists' attempts to control women's reproduction---to increase the birthrates of people they considered ``fit'' and to decrease or eliminate those of the ``unfit''---involved them in broad-ranging public debates over the ``women question'' which occupied Americans and Europeans during the same period of time. Although German and American scientific eugenists held nearly identical models of genetics, their understandings of the biological nature of the female sex and the race-building prescriptions they aimed at women differed substantially. This dissertation analyzes eugenic arguments over women's education, entrance into the professions, welfare provisions, protective legislation, suffrage, and reproductive freedom to find ideological, social, and geopolitical explanations for those national differences. The opinions of middle-class educated eugenists carried the weight of scientific expertise and had practical consequences for women's lives. Conversely, however, eugenists' culturally located imaginations colored their beliefs about women, and their public utterances and writings were limited further by what was politically possible. This work uses eugenic rhetoric as a lens through which to view the social construction and maintenance of female gender roles, anticipating that the contrasts and comparisons between the two countries will render the process more visible in both contexts. On the ideological level, American eugenists' discussions of women reveal their commitment to individuality, meritocracy, and liberal capitalism. Germans showed a more collectivist definition of racial health and emphasized the individual's duty to the commonweal. The biology of femaleness and the eugenics of women's roles were also influenced by the actual historical state of gender relations in the two countries. American women's greater presence in public, in the universities and, therefore, in the institutions of eugenics, gave them an advantage over German women in defining the limits of political possibility for any racial improvement schemes. Finally, eugenic rhetoric on the ``woman question'' was critically dependent on where eugenists located their greatest racial threat. Germans most feared of a military conquest from outside their borders. This tempered all their efforts to improve population quality with a perceived need to increase the quantity, creating insistent demands for women's reproductive work. Americans, meanwhile, were most concerned about inundation by immigrants and about those they deemed ``unfit'' already within their borders---the poor and working classes, the criminal and ``feebleminded,'' and ethnic and racial minorities. American eugenists could therefore assign middle-class white women's public reform work a eugenic value in controlling the ``dangerous classes.''
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 65/11 (2005): 4308. UMI pub. no. 3152629.
Article
Adams, Mark B.;
Allen, Garland E.;
Weiss, Sheila Faith;
(2005)
Human Heredity and Politics: A Comparative International Study of the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor (United States), the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (Germany), and the Maxim Gorky Medical Genetics Institute (USSR)
(/isis/citation/CBB000610606/)
Article
Wittmann, Emily;
(2004)
To What Extent Were Ideas and Beliefs about Eugenics held in Nazi Germany Shared in Britain and the United States Prior to the Second World War?
(/isis/citation/CBB000932434/)
Thesis
Claudia Jeanne Ford;
(2015)
Weed Women, All Night Vigils, and the Secret Life of Plants: Negotiated Epistemologies of Ethnogynecological Plant Knowledge in American History
(/isis/citation/CBB407270471/)
Article
Fangerau, Heiner;
(2006)
Human Reproduction and Eugenics as a Public Health Issue: The Contemporary Reception of a German Standard Textbook on Racial Hygiene 1921--1941
(/isis/citation/CBB001031913/)
Thesis
Krome-Lukens, Anna L.;
(2014)
The Reform Imagination: Gender, Eugenics, and the Welfare State in North Carolina, 1900--1940
(/isis/citation/CBB001567558/)
Article
Fangerau, Heiner;
(2005)
Making Eugenics a Public Issue: A Reception Study of the First German Compendium on Racial Hygiene, 1921--1940
(/isis/citation/CBB001031914/)
Book
Lovett, Laura L.;
(2007)
Conceiving the Future: Pronatalism, Reproduction, and the Family in the United States, 1890--1938
(/isis/citation/CBB000850751/)
Article
Segrest, Mab;
(2014)
Exalted on the Ward: “Mary Roberts,” the Georgia State Sanitarium, and the Psychiatric “Speciality” of Race
(/isis/citation/CBB001201824/)
Article
Krementsov, Nikolai L.;
(2015)
The Strength of a Loosely Defined Movement: Eugenics and Medicine in Imperial Russia
(/isis/citation/CBB001422190/)
Thesis
Norman, Kathleen Lynne;
(2000)
“Biological living”: The redemption of women and America through healthy living, dress and eugenics
(/isis/citation/CBB001560835/)
Article
Weber, Heike;
(2013)
Towards “Total” Recycling: Women, Waste and Food Waste Recovery in Germany, 1914--1939
(/isis/citation/CBB001201568/)
Book
English, Daylanne K.;
(2004)
Unnatural Selections: Eugenics in American Modernism and the Harlem Renaissance
(/isis/citation/CBB000501083/)
Thesis
Nadkarni, Asha;
(2006)
Reproductive Nationalism: Eugenic Feminist Literature in the United States andIndia
(/isis/citation/CBB001561488/)
Book
Bluhm, Agnes;
Bleker, Johanna;
Ludwig, Svenja;
(2007)
Emanzipation und Eugenik: Die Briefe der Frauenrechtlerin, Rassenhygienikerin und Genetikerin Agnes Bluhm an den Studienfreund Alfred Ploetz aus den Jahren 1901--1938
(/isis/citation/CBB001022122/)
Book
Jones, Jeannette Eileen;
Sharp, Patrick B.;
(2010)
Darwin in Atlantic Cultures: Evolutionary Visions of Race, Gender, and Sexuality
(/isis/citation/CBB001033825/)
Article
Pitts, Yvonne;
(2012)
Disability, Scientific Authority, and Women's Political Participation at the Turn of the Twentieth-Century United States
(/isis/citation/CBB001450306/)
Thesis
Vogt, Sara;
(2012)
Bodies of Surveillance: Disability, Femininity, and the Keepers of the Gene Pool, 1910--1925
(/isis/citation/CBB001567392/)
Book
Kirsten Leng;
(2018)
Sexual Politics and Feminist Science: Women Sexologists in Germany, 1900–1933
(/isis/citation/CBB495950825/)
Book
Rembis, Michael Allen;
(2011)
Defining Deviance: Sex, Science, and Delinquent Girls, 1890--1960
(/isis/citation/CBB001550481/)
Thesis
Matz, Brendan A.;
(2011)
Crafting Heredity: The Art and Science of Livestock Breeding in the United States and Germany, 1860--1914
(/isis/citation/CBB001567276/)
Be the first to comment!