Forber, Patrick (Author)
Sober, Elliott R.
Stanford University
Edition Details: Advisor: Sober, Elliott
Physical Details: 220 pp.
Language: English
I offer an account of confirmation for evolutionary biology that aims to capture the evidential relations articulated in scientific practice. Relying on canonical examples from evolutionary science, this project identifies the in-principle differences between alternative evolutionary hypotheses, such as natural selection, random drift and constraint, and investigates how biologists, in practice, construct tests to detect the traces of evolutionary change. The exemplary studies contrast only a few precise rivals and find clear discriminating evidence. Formal confirmation theory lacks the resources to explicate this because it does not account for how biologists constrain the space of relevant possibilities in order to evaluate data, something a normative theory of evidence should do. The negative argument raises an important question that any positive account must answer: _what counts as a genuine rival?_ The status of a genuine rival rests both on systematic theoretical exploration and on concrete application of evolutionary models to actual biological systems. The neutral theory of molecular evolution, for example, proposed and defended a new evolutionary rival by providing novel theoretical models of drift capable of explaining evolutionary phenomena and applying the models to molecular data. In this way the rich tradition of mathematical modeling in biology helps constrain possibility space by exploring the capabilities of evolutionary processes. Biologists then apply these abstract models to concrete biological populations by deploying various methodological strategies. Such a strategy, a specific package of idealizations, assumptions and methods, restricts focus to only some factors, such as genetic structure or ecological interactions with the environment, to understand evolution in real populations. Applying models in this way helps biologists further constrain which evolutionary rivals should figure in the precise contrastive tests applied to a specific biological system. Evaluating the practical evidential problems that face evolutionary inquiry, and the methodological solutions proposed, provides a deeper understanding of confirmation in actual scientific practice.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 67/05 (2006): 1757. UMI pub. no. 3219270.
Similar Citations
Article
Raphael Scholl;
(2020)
Unwarranted assumptions: Claude Bernard and the growth of the vera causa standard
(/isis/citation/CBB697599592/)
Book
Achinstein, Peter;
(2005)
Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories and Applications
(/isis/citation/CBB000550211/)
Chapter
Gayon, Jean;
(2007)
Karl Pearson ou les enjeux du phénoménalisme dans les sciences biologiques vers 1900
(/isis/citation/CBB001022510/)
Article
Joan Steigerwald;
(2016)
Entanglements of instruments and media in investigating organic life
(/isis/citation/CBB126105384/)
Article
Weber, Bruce H.;
(2007)
Fact, Phenomenon, and Theory in the Darwinian Research Tradition
(/isis/citation/CBB001230132/)
Article
Stahnisch, Frank W.;
(2005)
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Experimental Practice in Medicine and the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001033068/)
Book
Pierre-Alain Braillard;
Christophe Malaterre;
(2015)
Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB328513685/)
Article
Miles MacLeod;
Nancy J. Nersessian;
(2019)
Mesoscopic modeling as a cognitive strategy for handling complex biological systems
(/isis/citation/CBB904044166/)
Book
Michael A. Flannery;
(2018)
Nature's Prophet: Alfred Russel Wallace and His Evolution from Natural Selection to Natural Theology
(/isis/citation/CBB900090701/)
Article
Jessica Riskin;
(2020)
Biology’s mistress, a brief history
(/isis/citation/CBB880456753/)
Thesis
Hendrikse, Jesse Love;
(2006)
Explanation and Inheritance
(/isis/citation/CBB001561700/)
Book
Burian, Richard M.;
(2005)
The Epistemology of Development, Evolution, and Genetics: Selected Essays
(/isis/citation/CBB000550822/)
Article
Ratcliffe, Matthew;
(2002)
Evolution and Belief: The Missing Question
(/isis/citation/CBB000201184/)
Book
Scott Lidgard;
Lynn K. Nyhart;
(2017)
Biological Individuality: Integrating Scientific, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB108117531/)
Article
Tarquin Holmes;
(2017)
The wild type as concept and in experimental practice: A history of its role in classical genetics and evolutionary theory
(/isis/citation/CBB016897194/)
Book
Ayala, Francisco José;
Arp, Robert;
(2010)
Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001032775/)
Article
Matthen, Mohan;
(2000)
Intentionality and the Linguistic Analogy
(/isis/citation/CBB000770646/)
Book
Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice;
Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira;
Stefano, Waldir;
(2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1
(/isis/citation/CBB000820181/)
Book
Avery, John;
(2003)
Information Theory and Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB000501510/)
Article
Ute Deichmann;
(2016)
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters
(/isis/citation/CBB175338819/)
Be the first to comment!