Thesis ID: CBB001561705

Imbued Meaning: Science-Policy Interactions in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005)

unapi

Shaw, Alison (Author)


University of British Columbia (Canada)


Publication Date: 2005
Physical Details: 186 pp.
Language: English

The proliferation of scientific information in the international policy sphere has increased with the proliferation of global environmental problems. The conventional transfer of scientific information becomes increasingly complex in the international sphere where the implications of global environmental problems are severe and where divergent values around the type of information considered sufficient and adequate for policy action lead to differentiated governmental responses. Constructivist science-policy scholarship has challenged the unidirectional transfer of science into policy suggesting that the socio-political sphere plays a significant role in determining the value, legitimacy and relevance of science. Scholarship in the social studies of science goes further to argue that scientific knowledge itself is influenced by social and cultural factors, bringing the status of scientific knowledge as objective and neutral into question. This dissertation utilizes these two literature areas in order to derive an interactionist model of science-policy. A pragmatic framework is developed to focus on scientific processes in the policy sphere rather than on scientific content for addressing problems of science in policy. The proposition of this research is that processes that facilitate science-policy interaction contribute to the co-production of credible and legitimate policy relevant scientific information. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is used as a case study and is examined using this interactionist model. The IPCC was initiated in 1988 to interface with the international governmental community. The procedural adaptations that have taken place over the course of the past three IPCC iterations (1990, 1996, 2001) have increased governmental involvement in securing the legitimacy of the information produced and have indirectly led to considerable science-policy interaction. Two boundary processes, the review and approval processes, offered a sophisticated way for the user community (governments) to expose different and contradictory value frameworks while interrogating the underlying values and policy biases embedded in the science. The third boundary process, the policy relevant scientific questions, is viewed as a step in the direction of supporting an interactionist model of science-policy. This research shows that science-policy interaction in the IPCC process has moved in the direction of a constructivist understanding without having been framed that way. Recommendations are made for ways to move from a focus on what is referred to here as weak co-production in the IPCC to the strong co- production of policy relevant scientific information in order to derive climate change information that is both authorized and imbued with meaning.

...More

Description Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 66/12 (2006): 4551. UMI pub. no. NR10567.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001561705/

Similar Citations

Article Mahony, Martin; Hulme, Mike; (2012)
The Colour of Risk: An Exploration of the IPCC's “Burning Embers” Diagram (/isis/citation/CBB001212089/)

Article Edwards, Paul N.; (1996)
Global comprehensive models in politics and policymaking (/isis/citation/CBB001181687/)

Article Weart, Spencer R.; (2007)
Money for Keeling: Monitoring CO2 Levels (/isis/citation/CBB000700596/)

Chapter Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik M.; (2008)
Challenging Knowledge: How Climate Science Became a Victim of the Cold War (/isis/citation/CBB000951758/)

Book Weart, Spencer R.; (2003)
The Discovery of Global Warming (/isis/citation/CBB000430278/)

Article Randalls, Samuel; (2010)
History of the 2ºC Climate Target (/isis/citation/CBB001221297/)

Article Gupta, Joyeeta; (2010)
A History of International Climate Change Policy (/isis/citation/CBB001221294/)

Article Göran Sundqvist; Ingemar Bohlin; Erlend AT Hermansen; Steven Yearley; (2015)
Formalization and separation: A systematic basis for interpreting approaches to summarizing science for climate policy (/isis/citation/CBB221340735/)

Article Nierenberg, Nicolas; Tschinkel, Walter R.; Tschinkel, Victoria J.; (2010)
Early Climate Change Consensus at the National Academy: The Origins and Making of Changing Climate (/isis/citation/CBB001022609/)

Article Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik M.; Shindell, Matthew; (2008)
From Chicken Little to Dr. Pangloss: William Nierenberg, Global Warming, and the Social Deconstruction of Scientific Knowledge (/isis/citation/CBB000950400/)

Article Martello, Marybeth Long; (2008)
Arctic Indigenous Peoples as Representations and Representatives of Climate Change (/isis/citation/CBB000953500/)

Book Malard, Bregoire; (2009)
Global Science and National Sovereignty: Studies in Historical Sociology of Science (/isis/citation/CBB000951522/)

Article Moser, Susanne C.; (2010)
Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions (/isis/citation/CBB001221298/)

Article Weart, Spencer; (2010)
The Development of General Circulation Models of Climate (/isis/citation/CBB001024216/)

Article Bickerstaff, K.; Lorenzoni, I.; Pidgeon, N. F.; Poortinga, W.; Simmons, P.; (2008)
Reframing Nuclear Power in the UK Energy Debate: Nuclear Power, Climate Change Mitigation and Radioactive Waste (/isis/citation/CBB000831216/)

Article Jankovic, Vladimir; (2010)
Climates as Commodities: Jean Pierre Purry and the Modelling of the Best Climate on Earth (/isis/citation/CBB001024215/)

Authors & Contributors
Weart, Spencer R.
Oreskes, Naomi
Conway, Erik M.
Sundqvist, Göran
Erlend AT Hermansen
Yearley, Steven
Concepts
Climate and climatology
Global warming
Science and politics
Climate change
Controversies and disputes
Public understanding of science
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
20th century, early
20th century
18th century
Places
United States
Great Britain
Arctic regions
Russia
Europe
European Union
Institutions
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
UK Committee on Climate Change
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment