Wynn, James (Author)
Though modern philosophers of science recognize the inappropriateness of the reduction of all scientific investigations to mathematics, mathematics and science share a long history with one another during which mathematics has been employed as a major component of scientific argumentation. Over the last twenty years, rhetoricians have done substantial work studying the role of argumentation in science (Bazerman 1988; Gross 1990, 2002; Myers 1990; Fahnestock 1999); however, despite the importance of mathematics in making scientific arguments, little effort has been made to understand the role mathematics has played in making these arguments. This dissertation represents a move to resolve this shortcoming by investigating the role of mathematics in arguments in evolutionary biology from the middle of the nineteenth to the beginning of the twentieth century. In the first part of the nineteenth century, the mass collection and mathematical assessment of data for scientific purposes provides the context for understanding some of the rhetorical choices of an important group of natural philosophers and biologists who developed arguments in the second half of the century about the nature of variation, evolution, and heredity. In the works of Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, Francis Galton, and Karl Pearson, arguments from probability and statistics play important roles as support for their arguments and as a source of invention for their claims. This investigation of the rhetorical situations of these four biologists, their arguments, and the role of the principles, operations, and formulae of probability and statistics supports the position that mathematization had a major impact on the nature of scientific evidence in the nineteenth century. What it also suggests is that, though mathematized arguments may have had a great deal of credibility within the scientific community in general, factors such as the stature of the rhetor and of their biological theory within their specific discourse communities played an equally important role in the persuasiveness of their arguments.
...MoreDescription Cited in Diss. Abstr. Int. A 67/03 (2006). UMI pub. no. 3212609.
Article
Nicholas W. Gillham;
(2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism
(/isis/citation/CBB738872407/)
Book
Rushton, Alan R.;
(2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939
(/isis/citation/CBB001020882/)
Article
Charles H. Pence;
(2015)
The Early History of Chance in Evolution
(/isis/citation/CBB068013192/)
Article
Kampourakis, Kostas;
(2013)
Mendel and the Path to Genetics: Portraying Science as a Social Process
(/isis/citation/CBB001252323/)
Article
Pritchard, Chris;
(2008)
Mistakes Concerning a Chance Encounter between Francis Galton and John Venn
(/isis/citation/CBB000931921/)
Article
Deichmann, Ute;
(2010)
Gemmules and Elements: On Darwin's and Mendel's Concepts and Methods in Heredity
(/isis/citation/CBB001230066/)
Article
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2014)
The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance
(/isis/citation/CBB001420141/)
Article
Pilpel, Avital;
(2007)
Statistics Is Not Enough: Revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's Critique (1936) of Mendel's Experimental Results (1866)
(/isis/citation/CBB000830396/)
Article
Polizello, Andreza;
Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr;
(2012)
Modelos microscópicos de herança no século XIX
(/isis/citation/CBB001212015/)
Article
Aldrich, John;
(2010)
Mathematics in the London/Royal Statistical Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001021434/)
Article
Bowler, Peter J.;
(2014)
Francis Galton's Saltationism and the Ambiguities of Selection
(/isis/citation/CBB001421642/)
Thesis
Pritchard, Christopher Bryn;
(2005)
The Normal Curve of Evolutionary Biology, 1869--1877, with Special Referenceto the Support Given to Francis Galton by George Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB001561898/)
Article
Aldrich, John;
(2009)
Burnside's Engagement with the “Modern Theory of Statistics”
(/isis/citation/CBB000932073/)
Book
Tudge, Colin;
(2001)
Impact of the Gene: From Mendel's Peas to Designer Babies
(/isis/citation/CBB000102136/)
Article
Friendly, Michael;
Denis, Daniel;
(2005)
The Early Origins and Development of the Scatterplot
(/isis/citation/CBB000671008/)
Article
Stigler, Stephen M.;
(2008)
Karl Pearson's Theoretical Errors and the Advances They Inspired
(/isis/citation/CBB001035742/)
Article
Pritchard, Chris;
(2006)
Bagatelle as the Inspiration for Galton's Quincunx
(/isis/citation/CBB000850086/)
Thesis
Wynn, James;
(2006)
Life's Rich Pattern: The Role of Statistics and Probability in Nineteenth Century Argumentation for Theories of Evolution, Variation, and Heredity
(/isis/citation/CBB001561728/)
Article
López-Beltrán, Carlos;
(2006)
Storytelling, Statistics and Hereditary Thought: The Narrative Support of Early Statistics
(/isis/citation/CBB000770715/)
Article
Edwards, A. W. F.;
(2012)
Punnett's Square
(/isis/citation/CBB001221605/)
Be the first to comment!